Reference health

The evolution of scientific disciplines in applied sciences: dynamics and empirical properties of experimental physics

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03464-y
CiteStamped reference-health badge
2 of 106 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-03

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

75 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1453/jel.v5i1.1577
does not resolve to a known work10.1453/jeb.v5i1.1578
The 104 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1038/490335a
The rise of research networks
resolves10.1038/497557a
The fourth age of research
resolves10.2307/3340258
Paradigm Revision and "Parsonianism"
resolves10.1016/S0160-9327(98)01093-X
Characteristics of scientific revolutions
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.012
Co-evolutionary and systemic study on the evolution of emerging stem cell-based therapies
resolves10.2307/2090769
Social Factors in the Origins of a New Science: The Case of Psychology
resolves10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.001
Scientific discovery and topological transitions in collaboration networks
resolves10.1073/pnas.1719557115
The Matthew effect in science funding
resolves10.2307/1415402
The Problem of Originality in Science
resolves10.1007/s11192-011-0429-3
Modeling science: studying the structure and dynamics of science
resolves10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.008
Visual conceptualizations and models of science
resolves10.1073/pnas.0307509100
Mapping knowledge domains: Characterizing PNAS
resolves10.1007/s11192-009-0403-5
Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research
resolves10.1007/s11192-005-0255-6
Mapping the backbone of science
resolves10.1016/S1355-2198(02)00031-X
Exploring the limits of classical physics: Planck, Einstein, and the structure of a scientific revolution
resolves10.1007/s11192-006-0032-1
Law of cumulative advantages in the evolution of scientific fields
resolves10.1177/016224399401900401
Is Science a Public Good? Fifth Mullins Lecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 23 March 1993
resolves10.1111/j.1533-8525.1976.tb01715.x
State of the Field The Conceptualization of Scientific Specialties
resolves10.1080/0810902042000331322
A taxonomy of public research bodies: A systemic approach1
resolves10.1504/IJTTC.2005.006699
Metrics to measure the technology transfer absorption: analysis of the relationship between institutes and adopters in northern Italy
resolves10.1504/WRSTSD.2006.008759
Analysis and classification of public research institutes
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2009.06.007
Democratization is the driving force for technological and economic change
resolves10.1016/j.hlpt.2013.09.007
Path-breaking target therapies for lung cancer and a far-sighted health policy to support clinical and cost effectiveness
resolves10.1504/IJKL.2015.071052
Technological paradigms and trajectories as determinants of the R&D corporate change in drug discovery industry
resolves10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.05.008
General sources of general purpose technologies in complex societies: Theory of global leadership-driven innovation, warfare and human development
resolves10.1080/09537325.2015.1095287
Radical innovations as drivers of breakthroughs: characteristics and properties of the management of technology leading to superior organisational performance in the discovery process of R&D labs
resolves10.1007/s11192-018-2902-8
General properties of the evolution of research fields: a scientometric study of human microbiome, evolutionary robotics and astrobiology
resolves10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3709-1
The Role of Superpowers in Conflict Development and Resolutions
resolves10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3708-1
Revolutions and Evolutions
resolves10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101198
Deep learning technology for improving cancer care in society: New directions in cancer imaging driven by artificial intelligence
resolves10.1007/s11192-016-2027-x
Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.007
Path-breaking directions of nanotechnology-based chemotherapy and molecular cancer therapy
resolves10.1073/pnas.1510820113
Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration
resolves10.1016/j.jengtecman.2019.11.003
A theory of the evolution of technology: Technological parasitism and the implications for innovation magement
resolves10.2307/2392088
A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice
resolves10.1007/BF02016840
Studies in scientific collaboration
resolves10.1037/h0024051
Collaboration in an invisible college.
resolves10.1023/A:1004348123030
The Role of Research Centres in the Collectivisation of Academic Science
resolves10.1126/science.1201765
Metaknowledge
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0066938
Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences
resolves10.1126/science.1141754
Mathematics and Complex Systems
resolves10.1126/science.aao0185
Science of science
resolves10.1177/030631277900900405
International Research Collaboration
resolves10.1016/S1355-2198(00)00018-6
The Assembly of Geophysics: Scientific Disciplines as Frameworks of Consensus
resolves10.1126/science.1106340
Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance
resolves10.1016/j.ipm.2009.12.010
Interdisciplinarity and the information-seeking behavior of scientists
resolves10.1177/0306312703334003
Smoothing the Waters
resolves10.1007/BF01881388
Some economic aspects of science
resolves10.1093/0195145836.001.0001
Science, Truth, and Democracy
resolves10.1002/asi.20991
Toward a consensus map of science
resolves10.1007/978-94-010-1831-9
Determinants and Controls of Scientific Development
resolves10.1007/BF02016292
The stochastic model of evolution of scientific disciplines
resolves10.1093/aristotelian/69.1.149
II—Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511621123
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
resolves10.1515/9783110819038.123
The Development of Specialties in Science: the Case of X-ray Protein Crystallography
resolves10.1177/0306312705052359
The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity
resolves10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2477
Quasicrystals: A New Class of Ordered Structures
resolves10.1007/BF02687210
Four programs of research in scientific communication
resolves10.1002/0470035471
Nuclear and Particle Physics
resolves10.2307/2089193
Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science
resolves10.1126/science.159.3810.56
The Matthew Effect in Science
resolves10.4324/9780203866184
Interdisciplinarity
resolves10.1002/asi.10326
Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas
resolves10.1177/030631277400400301
Conceptual Displacement and Migration in Science: A Prefatory Paper
resolves10.1111/j.1467-954X.1975.tb02231.x
Three Models of Scientific Development
resolves10.1007/BF01881390
The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology
resolves10.1177/030631277300300302
The Development of Specialties in Social Science: The Case of Ethnomethodology
resolves10.1080/05775132.1996.11471873
Science, Economic Growth, and Public Policy
resolves10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
The structure of scientific collaboration networks
resolves10.1073/pnas.0307545100
Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration
resolves10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.365
So-called icosahedral and decagonal quasicrystals are twins of an 820-atom cubic crystal
resolves10.1007/978-3-642-23068-4_4
Agent-Based Models of Science
resolves10.1098/rsif.2014.0378
The Matthew effect in empirical data
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511809040
Introduction to High Energy Physics
resolves10.2307/2010742
Truth and Its Verification
resolves10.1086/344935
New Technologies, Human‐Microbe Interactions, and the Search for Previously Unrecognized Pathogens
resolves10.7208/chicago/9780226712055.001.0001
The Meaning of Evolution
resolves10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.09.013
Philosophy, history and sociology of science: Interdisciplinary relations and complex social identities
resolves10.2307/2230485
Science, Invention and Economic Growth
resolves10.2307/2011346
The Bases for Generalization in Scientific Methods
resolves10.1093/0195188047.001.0001
Is War Necessary for Economic Growth?
resolves10.1007/978-3-642-23068-4
Models of Science Dynamics
resolves10.1556/AGeod.45.2010.2.9
History of geophysics
resolves10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1951
Metallic Phase with Long-Range Orientational Order and No Translational Symmetry
resolves10.1016/j.socnet.2015.02.006
Weaving the fabric of science: Dynamic network models of science's unfolding structure
resolves10.1037/10466-000
Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology's history.
resolves10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.59
Psychology's Status as a Scientific Discipline: Its Empirical Placement within an Implicit Hierarchy of the Sciences
resolves10.23987/sts.55011
Basic and Applied Sciences - Can the Distinction (Still) Be Drawn?
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9<799::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-G
Visualizing science by citation mapping
resolves10.1023/A:1007034317576
Department conditions and the emergence of new disciplines: Two cases in the legitimation of African-American Studies
resolves10.1177/030631200030001003
Scientific Graphs and the Hierarchy of the Sciences:
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.010
Evolution of innovation system literature: Intellectual bases and emerging trends
resolves10.1017/CBO9781139164498
Practical Physics
resolves10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.07.009
The role of the Matthew effect in science
resolves10.1038/srep01069
Social Dynamics of Science
resolves10.1016/j.progsurf.2004.05.012
An introduction to the surface science of quasicrystals
resolves10.1002/asi.21366
Discarding the ‘basic science/applied science’ dichotomy: A knowledge utilization triangle classification system of research journals
resolves10.1023/A:1005647328460
On Growth, Ageing, and Fractal Differentiation of Science
resolves10.1007/BF02017073
Dynamics of a scientific field analysed by co-subfield structures
resolves10.1023/A:1025479524390
Seismology as a dynamic, distributed area of scientific research
resolves10.1007/BF00869284
Theories, systemic models (SYMOs), laws and facts in the sciences
resolves10.1177/0306312705045811
Rethinking Scientific Specialization
resolves10.1126/science.1136099
The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.014
Unfolding the convergence process of scientific knowledge for the early identification of emerging technologies
The 75 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAlexander, J. (1983). Theoretical logic in sociology (Vol. 2). Berkeley: University of California Press.
no DOI — not checkedBarger, V. D., & Olsson, M. G. (1973). Classical mechanics: A modern perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.
no DOI — not checkedBernal, J. D. (1939). The social function of science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
no DOI — not checkedBleaney, B. I., & Bleaney, B. (1965). Electricity & magnetism. Oxford Uni: Press.
no DOI — not checkedBörner, K., Boyack K.W., Milojević S., & Morris S. (2012). An introduction to modeling science: basic model types, key definitions, and a general framework for the comparison of process models. In Scharnhorst et al. Models of science dynamics (pp. 3–22). New York: Springer.
no DOI — not checkedBush, V. (1945). Science: The endless frontier. North Stratford: Ayer Co.
no DOI — not checkedCallon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–229). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
no DOI — not checkedCheng, T. P. (2010). Relativity, gravitation and cosmology: A basic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedCohen, I. B. (1952). Orthodoxy and Scientific Progress. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society,96, 505–512.
no DOI — not checkedConstant, E. W. (2000). The evolution of war and technology. In J. Zirman (Ed.), Technological knowledge as an evolutionary process (pp. 281–298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedCrane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
no DOI — not checkedDampier, W. C. (1953). Shorter history of science. New York: Macmillan Company Armed.
no DOI — not checkedDe Solla Price, D. J. (1986). Little science, big science and beyond, Ch. 3. New York: Columbia University Press.
no DOI — not checkedDogan, M., & Pahre, R. (1990). Creative marginality. Innovation at the intersections of social sciences. Boulder: Westview Press.
no DOI — not checkedEdge D.O. & Mulkay M.J. (1974). Case studies of scientific specialties. Working paper: University of Edinburgh, Science Studies Unit. German translation published in Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie.
no DOI — not checkedFreedman, P. (1960). The principles of scientific research (First edition 1949). London: Pergamon Press.
no DOI — not checkedFultz, B., & Howe, J. (2007). Transmission electron microscopy and diffractometry of materials. New York: Springer.
no DOI — not checkedGarg, K. C., Sharma, P., & Sharma, L. (1993). Bradford's law in relation to the evolution of a field. A case study of solar power research. Scientometrics,27(3), 669–685.
no DOI — not checkedGenovesi, A. (1786). Elementi di Fisica Sperimentale, Publisher presso Giuseppe di Bisogno, Napoli (Italy)
no DOI — not checkedGibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwatzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary society. London: Sage Publications.
no DOI — not checkedGodin, B. (2001). Defining research: is research always systematic? Project on the history and sociology of S&T statistics, No.5, OST: Montreal.
no DOI — not checkedGolinski, J. (1998). Making natural knowledge: constructivism and the history of science, chapter 2 (pp. 47–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedGuntau, M., & Laitko, H. (1988). On the origin and nature of scientific disciplines. In W. R. Woodward & R. S. Cohen (Eds.), World views and scientific discipline formation, chapter 1 (pp. 17–89). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
no DOI — not checkedHagstrom, W. O. (1970). Factors related to the use of different modes of publishing research in four scientific fields. In C. E. Nelson & D. K. Pollock (Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers (pp. 85–124). Lexington: Mass. Lexington Books.
no DOI — not checkedHalliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2014). Fundamental of Physics (Vol. 10). New York: Wiley.
no DOI — not checkedHaskins C.P. (1965). Report of the President by Carnegie Institution of Washington Yearbook 63, 1963–1964, Washington, D.C.
no DOI — not checkedHawkes, P. (2007). The beginnings of electron microscopy transmission electron microscopy and diffractometry of materials. New York: Springer.
no DOI — not checkedHeyde, K. (1994). Basic ideas and concepts in nuclear physics. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
no DOI — not checkedHughes, S. S. (1977). The virus: A history of the concept. New York: Science History Publications.
no DOI — not checkedInternational Union of Crystallography. (1992). Report of the Executive Committee for 1991. Acta Crystallographica,A48, 922–946.
no DOI — not checkedJackson, J. D. (1999). Classical electrodynamics. New York: Wiley.
no DOI — not checkedKlein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries. Knowledge, disciplinarities and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
no DOI — not checkedKleppner, D., & Kolenkow, R. (2014). An introduction to mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
no DOI — not checkedKuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
no DOI — not checkedLatour, B. (1987a). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
no DOI — not checkedLatour, B. (1987b). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
no DOI — not checkedLatour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
no DOI — not checkedLatour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London and Beverly Hills: Sage.
no DOI — not checkedLatour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
no DOI — not checkedLemaine, G., MacLeod, R., Mulkay, M., & Weingart, P. (Eds.). (1976). Perspectives on the emergence of scientific disciplines, the hague and Paris: Mouton (pp. 1–23). Chicago: Aldine.
no DOI — not checkedLevi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
no DOI — not checkedLeydesdorff, L., & Cozzens, S. E. (1993). The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics,26(133), 154.
no DOI — not checkedLilley, J. (2001). Nuclear physics principles and applications. New York: Wiley.
no DOI — not checkedMartin, B., & Shaw, G. (2008). Particle physics. New York: Wiley.
no DOI — not checkedMonge G., Cassini J.-D., Bertholon P., Hassenfratz J.H., & Panckoucke C.J. (1793–1822). Dictionnaire de physique. Paris: Hotel de Thou
no DOI — not checkedMulkay, M. J. (1969). Some aspects of cultural growth in the natural sciences. Social Research,36, 22–52.
no DOI — not checkedMullins, N. C. (1974). A sociological theory of normal and revolutionary science. In K. D. Knorr, H. Strasser, & H. G. Zilian (Eds.), Determinants and controls of scientific development. Boston: Reidel.
no DOI — not checkedNelson, R. R. (1962). The link between science and invention: The case of the transistor, in the rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 549–583). Princeton University Press: Princeton.
no DOI — not checkedNewell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. New York: Prentice-Hall.
no DOI — not checkedNHGRI. (2020). National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Retrieved March 2020, from https://www.genome.gov/about-nhgri/Organization
no DOI — not checkedNordhaus, W. (1969). Invention. Growth and Welfare: MIT Press, Massachusetts Cambridge.
no DOI — not checkedNoyons, E. C. M., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: Self-organized structuring to map neural network research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,49, 68–81.
no DOI — not checkedNYU Department of Physics. (2019). Syllabus for Advanced Experimental Physics, Retrieved November, 2019, from https://physics.nyu.edu/undergraduate/SyllabusforAdvancedExperimentalPhysics.pdf
no DOI — not checkedPan, R. K., Kaski, K., & Fortunato, S. (2012). World citation and collaboration networks: Uncovering the Role of geography in science. Scientific Reports,2(902), 1–7.
no DOI — not checkedPhillips, A. C. (1994). The physics of stars. New York: Wiley.
no DOI — not checkedPiaget, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
no DOI — not checkedPlanck, M. (1950). Scientific autobiography (pp. 33–34). London: Williams and Norgate.
no DOI — not checkedPolanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
no DOI — not checkedPolanyi, M. (1963). The potential theory of absorption (p. 94). London: In Knowing and Being, Routledge.
no DOI — not checkedPolitecnico di Milano. (2019). Fondamenti di Fisica Sperimentale, 2019–2020. Retrieved November, 2019, from https://www11.ceda.polimi.it/schedaincarico/schedaincarico/controller/scheda_pubblica/SchedaPublic.do?&evn_default=evento&c_classe=712874&polij_device_category=DESKTOP&__pj0=0&__pj1=a794e2436c25eddb8fb6e908fe63792e.
no DOI — not checkedPopper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
no DOI — not checkedReimer, L., & Kohl, H. (2008). Transmission electron microscopy: Physics of image formation. New York: Springer.
no DOI — not checkedScience. (1965). The evolution of science. Science-New Series,148(3671), 737.
no DOI — not checkedScienceDirect. (2019). Advanced Research. Retrieved October, 2019, from https://www2.scopus.com/search/form.uri?display=basic.
no DOI — not checkedSeidman, S. S. (1987). Models of scientific development in sociology. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations,15(1), 119–139.
no DOI — not checkedSpencer, H. (1857). Progress: It’s law and cause. Westminster Review,67(April), 445–465.
no DOI — not checkedStephan, P. E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature,34(3), 1199–1235.
no DOI — not checkedStephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1992). How science is done; Why science is done. Striking the mother lode in science: The importance of age, place and time, chapter 2 (pp. 11–24). New York: Oxford University Press.
no DOI — not checkedStorer, N. W. (1967). The hard sciences and the soft: Some sociological observations. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association,55(1), 75–84.
no DOI — not checkedStorer, N. W. (1970). The internationality of science and the nationality of scientists. Int Soc Sci J,22(1), 80–93.
no DOI — not checkedTaylor J.R. (1997). An introduction to error analysis. University Science Books.
no DOI — not checkedTiryakian, E. (1979). The significance of schools in the development of sociology. In W. Snizek, et al. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in theory and research. Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.
no DOI — not checkedWagner, C. (2008). The new invisible college: Science for development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
no DOI — not checkedWaterson, A. P., & Wilkinson, L. (1978). An introduction to the history of virology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedYoung, H. D., & Freedman, R. A. (2012). University physics. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-020-03464-y"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-020-03464-y/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-020-03464-y/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-020-03464-y)