Reference health

What is the relationship between research funding and citation-based performance? A comparative analysis between critical disciplines

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04077-9
CiteStamped reference-health badge
43/43 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

4 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 43 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0085777
powerlaw: A Python Package for Analysis of Heavy-Tailed Distributions
resolves10.1126/science.286.5439.509
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
resolves10.1137/070710111
Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data
resolves10.1007/s11192-005-0276-1
A scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes
resolves10.1080/0810902042000331322
A taxonomy of public research bodies: A systemic approach1
resolves10.1007/s11192-018-2902-8
General properties of the evolution of research fields: a scientometric study of human microbiome, evolutionary robotics and astrobiology
resolves10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.03.007
Why do nations produce science advances and new technology?
resolves10.1007/s11192-020-03464-y
The evolution of scientific disciplines in applied sciences: dynamics and empirical properties of experimental physics
resolves10.1007/s11192-016-2027-x
Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration
resolves10.1073/pnas.1510820113
Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration
resolves10.1007/s11192-014-1427-z
The impact of hybrid public and market-oriented financing mechanisms on the scientific portfolio and performances of public research labs: a scientometric analysis
resolves10.1108/EUM0000000007153
Citation, funding acknowledgement and author nationality relationships in four information science journals
resolves10.1002/asi.4630270505
A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes
resolves10.1126/science.aao0185
Science of science
resolves10.1007/s11192-019-03073-4
Research fund evaluation based on academic publication output analysis: the case of Chinese research fund evaluation
resolves10.18637/jss.v064.i02
Fitting Heavy Tailed Distributions: The<b>poweRlaw</b>Package
resolves10.1002/asi.23406
The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: Evidence from six smaller <scp>E</scp>uropean countries
resolves10.1007/s11024-011-9170-6
Equity and Excellence in Research Funding
resolves10.1007/s11051-006-9147-9
Connecting NSF funding to patent innovation in nanotechnology (2001–2004)
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.005
The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity
resolves10.3152/147154300781782156
Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation
resolves10.1207/s15366359mea0301_3
Scale-Independent Bibliometric Indicators
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0156150
What Is a Complex Innovation System?
resolves10.1007/BF02457963
The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research
resolves10.1086/354848
The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property
resolves10.1007/s11192-020-03652-w
Is open access publication useful for all research fields? Presence of funding, collaboration and impact
resolves10.1007/BF02018158
On the relationship of funding and research publications
resolves10.1002/ev.261
Evaluation of large research initiatives: Outcomes, challenges, and methodological considerations
resolves10.1007/s11192-012-0779-5
Looking for the impact of peer review: does count of funding acknowledgements really predict research impact?
resolves10.1007/s11192-017-2401-3
The citation-based impact of complex innovation systems scales with the size of the system
resolves10.1002/asi.23759
The scaling relationship between citation‐based performance and coauthorship patterns in natural sciences
resolves10.1002/asi.23575
The power–law relationship between citation‐based performance and collaboration in articles in management journals: A scale‐independent approach
resolves10.1007/s11192-017-2612-7
The power law relationship between citation impact and multi-authorship patterns in articles in Information Science &amp; Library Science journals
resolves10.1108/OIR-08-2015-0249
Research impact of general and funded papers
resolves10.1186/gb-2007-8-4-404
Power-law-like distributions in biomedical publications and research funding
resolves10.1007/BF02458380
The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results
resolves10.1002/asi.20284
Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators: Research group indicator distributions and correlations
resolves10.1002/asi.20761
Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European research universities: Prevalent scaling rules in the science system
resolves10.1007/s11192-011-0362-5
Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0117727
Is There a Relationship between Research Sponsorship and Publication Impact? An Analysis of Funding Acknowledgments in Nanotechnology Papers
resolves10.1007/s11192-017-2583-8
The funding factor: a cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact
resolves10.1016/j.joi.2008.09.002
The power law model and total career h-index sequences
resolves10.1007/s11192-018-2662-5
Do funded papers attract more usage?
The 4 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedLeguendre, P., & Leguendre, L. (2012). Numerical ecology (3rd ed.). Elsevier B. V.
no DOI — not checkedLotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Academy of Sciences, 16(1), 317–323.
no DOI — not checkedRousseau, R (2000, September). Are multi-authored articles cited more than single-authored ones? Are collaborations with authors from other countries more cited than collaborations whitin the country? A case study. In Proceedings of the second Berlin workshop on scientometrcs and informetrics. Collaboration in Sceince and Technology. Gesellschaft furr Wissenschaftsforschung: Berlin (pp.173-176)
no DOI — not checkedWeb of Science. (2021). Web of Science, Search in: Web of Science Core Collection, http://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&SID=E5lSYgaLwJn6kp2iz2G&search_mode=GeneralSearch (Accessed 24 March 2021)
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-021-04077-9"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-021-04077-9/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-021-04077-9/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-021-04077-9)