Reference health
Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science
3 of 73 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-03
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1453/jsas.v5i2.1651
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/j.envres.2021a.111339
does not resolve to a known work10.1016/j.hlpt.2021f.100512
The 70 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1177/2158244019829575
Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0085777
powerlaw: A Python Package for Analysis of Heavy-Tailed Distributions
resolves10.1007/s11192-015-1537-2
What can university administrators do to increase the publication and citation scores of their faculty members?
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.021
The important thing is not to win, it is to take part: What if scientists benefit from participating in research grant competitions?
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.022
Impact of public and private research funding on scientific production: The case of nanotechnology
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.007
The impact of national research funds: A regression discontinuity approach to the Chilean FONDECYT
resolves10.1002/asi.10230
Indicator‐assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers
resolves10.1007/s11192-010-0333-2
Effect on the journal impact factor of the number and document type of citing records: a wide-scale study
resolves10.1111/hequ.12185
Do performance‐based research funding systems affect research production and impact?
resolves10.1007/s11192-005-0276-1
A scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes
resolves10.1504/IJTIS.2015.074642
Spatial relation between geo-climate zones and technological outputs to explain the evolution of technology
resolves10.1007/s11192-018-2902-8
General properties of the evolution of research fields: a scientometric study of human microbiome, evolutionary robotics and astrobiology
resolves10.3390/su12229709
How (Un)sustainable Environments Are Related to the Diffusion of COVID-19: The Relation between Coronavirus Disease 2019, Air Pollution, Wind Resource and Energy
resolves10.1007/s11192-020-03464-y
The evolution of scientific disciplines in applied sciences: dynamics and empirical properties of experimental physics
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145801
The relation between length of lockdown, numbers of infected people and deaths of Covid-19, and economic growth of countries: Lessons learned to cope with future pandemics similar to Covid-19 and to constrain the deterioration of economic system
resolves10.1007/s11192-021-04172-x
Evolution and structure of research fields driven by crises and environmental threats: the COVID-19 research
resolves10.1007/s11356-020-11662-7
Effects of the spread of COVID-19 on public health of polluted cities: results of the first wave for explaining the dejà vu in the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic and epidemics of future vital agents
resolves10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101874
Probability of discoveries between research fields to explain scientific and technological change
resolves10.1007/s11192-016-2027-x
Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration
resolves10.1007/s11192-014-1427-z
The impact of hybrid public and market-oriented financing mechanisms on the scientific portfolio and performances of public research labs: a scientometric analysis
resolves10.3390/s21237803
Scientific Developments and New Technological Trajectories in Sensor Research
resolves10.1073/pnas.1510820113
Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration
resolves10.1002/asi.4630270505
A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes
resolves10.1007/s12570-013-0174-6
Association of scientific and nonscientific factors to citation rates of articles of renowned orthopedic journals
resolves10.1057/s41599-021-00891-x
The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: A study of SNSF Research Grants
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.005
The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.010
Evolution of innovation system literature: Intellectual bases and emerging trends
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0000403
Characteristics Associated with Citation Rate of the Medical Literature
resolves10.3152/147154306781778777
The art of getting funded: how scientists adapt to their funding conditions
resolves10.1002/asi.24109
The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012
Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective
resolves10.1007/s11115-018-0421-y
Metabolism of Public Research Organizations: How Do Laboratories Consume State Subsidies?
resolves10.1086/354848
The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property
resolves10.1007/s11192-020-03652-w
Is open access publication useful for all research fields? Presence of funding, collaboration and impact
resolves10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05998
How self-determination of scholars outclasses shrinking public research lab budgets, supporting scientific production: a case study and R&D management implications
resolves10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0024-y
Inequality and cumulative advantage in science careers: a case study of high-impact journals
resolves10.1073/pnas.1010757107
Nonuniversal power law scaling in the probability distribution of scientific citations
resolves10.1002/ev.261
Evaluation of large research initiatives: Outcomes, challenges, and methodological considerations
resolves10.1073/pnas.0806977105
Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact
resolves10.1001/jama.298.9.1002
Association Between Funding and Quality of Published Medical Education Research
resolves10.1007/s11192-012-0779-5
Looking for the impact of peer review: does count of funding acknowledgements really predict research impact?
resolves10.1007/s11192-019-03022-1
Probability and expected frequency of breakthroughs: basis and use of a robust method of research assessment
resolves10.1002/asi.23759
The scaling relationship between citation‐based performance and coauthorship patterns in natural sciences
resolves10.1007/s11192-017-2612-7
The power law relationship between citation impact and multi-authorship patterns in articles in Information Science & Library Science journals
resolves10.1007/s11192-021-04077-9
What is the relationship between research funding and citation-based performance? A comparative analysis between critical disciplines
resolves10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2
Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature
resolves10.1002/asi.20761
Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European research universities: Prevalent scaling rules in the science system
resolves10.1007/s11192-011-0362-5
Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology
resolves10.1007/s11192-017-2583-8
The funding factor: a cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCoccia, M. (2019b). Metabolism of public research organizations: How do laboratories consume state subsidies? Public Organization Review.
no DOI — not checkedCoccia, M., & Benati, I. (2018). Comparative Models of Inquiry. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing.
no DOI — not checkedFerraro, K. F., Shippee, T. P., & Schafer, M. H. (2009). Cumulative inequality theory for research on aging and the life course. In V. L. Bengston, D. Gans, N. M. Pulney, & M. Silverstein (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 413–433). Springer.
no DOI — not checkedLeguendre, P., & Leguendre, L. (2012). Numerical ecology (3rd ed.). Elsevier B. V.
no DOI — not checkedScopus. (2021). Scopu. Searchin:Startexploring,https://www.scopus.com/search/form.uri?display=basic#basic
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-022-04300-1"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-022-04300-1/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-022-04300-1)