Reference health
A Geospatial Approach for Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability to Nitrate Contamination in Agricultural Settings
41/41 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-10
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
25 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 41 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.013
Assessment and management of long-term nitrate pollution of ground water in agriculture-dominated watersheds
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014
Development and testing of three hybrid methods for the assessment of aquifer vulnerability to nitrates, based on the drastic model, an example from NE Korinthia, Greece
resolves10.1007/s11053-007-9038-5
Development and Implementation of a Bayesian-based Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment in Florida
resolves10.1007/s12517-009-0074-9
Evaluation of aquifers vulnerability to contamination in the Yarmouk River basin, Jordan, based on DRASTIC method
resolves10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0878:NRISEA]2.0.CO;2
NITROGEN RETENTION IN SEMIARID ECOSYSTEMS ACROSS A SOIL ORGANIC-MATTER GRADIENT
resolves10.1023/B:WATE.0000049188.73506.c9
Vulnerability Assessments of Colorado Ground Water to Nitrate Contamination
resolves10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00606-0
Predicting average annual groundwater levels from climatic variables: an empirical model
resolves10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb01568.x
POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON GROUND WATER IN LANSING, MICHIGAN<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00504-2
On the kriging of water table elevations using collateral information from a digital elevation model
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6584.1995.tb00047.x
Relation of Ground‐Water Quality to Land Use on Long Island, New York
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.08.005
Potential impacts of climate change on groundwater recharge and streamflow in a central European low mountain range
resolves10.1080/00224561.1990.12456473
A GIS-based approach to evaluating regional groundwater pollution potential with DRASTIC
resolves10.1007/s002540050466
Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods
resolves10.1007/s10040-003-0291-3
Karst groundwater vulnerability mapping: application of a new method in the Swabian Alb, Germany
resolves10.1007/s00254-006-0534-4
A new model (DRARCH) for assessing groundwater vulnerability to arsenic contamination at basin scale: a case study in Taiyuan basin, northern China
resolves10.3133/sir20065050
Vulnerability of recently recharged ground water in the High Plains aquifer to nitrate contamination
resolves10.2136/sssaj2005.0324
Direct and Indirect Effects of Soil Properties on Phosphorus Retention Capacity
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.011
Modeling vulnerability of groundwater to pollution under future scenarios of climate change and biofuels-related land use change: A case study in North Dakota, USA
resolves10.1007/s11053-007-9045-6
The Use of the Weights-of-Evidence Modeling Technique to Estimate the Vulnerability of Groundwater to Nitrate Contamination
resolves10.1007/s10040-007-0249-y
Validation of vulnerability mapping methods by field investigations and numerical modelling
resolves10.1021/es0113854
Probability of Nitrate Contamination of Recently Recharged Groundwaters in the Conterminous United States
resolves10.1007/s10040-005-0008-x
Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS
resolves10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600050007x
Nitrate Losses through Subsurface Tile Drainage in Conservation Reserve Program, Alfalfa, and Row Crop Systems
resolves10.1080/10106049109354307
Statewide groundwater‐vulnerability assessment in nebraska using the drastic/GIS model
resolves10.1029/2006WR005486
Global impacts of conversions from natural to agricultural ecosystems on water resources: Quantity versus quality
resolves10.1029/2005WR004742
Modeled impacts of predicted climate change on recharge and groundwater levels
resolves10.1007/s10040-012-0947-y
Assessment of groundwater vulnerability based on a modified DRASTIC model, GIS and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method: the case of Egirdir Lake basin (Isparta, Turkey)
resolves10.1080/13669877.2012.686053
GIS-based DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment: a review
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6592.2005.00055.x
A GIS‐Based Ground Water Contamination Risk Assessment Tool for Pesticides
resolves10.3133/sir20105149
Simulation of groundwater flow and effects of groundwater irrigation on stream base flow in the Elkhorn and Loup River basins, Nebraska, 1895-2055: Phase Two
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6584.1997.tb00175.x
Predicting the Probability of Elevated Nitrate Concentrations in the Puget Sound Basin: Implications for Aquifer Susceptibility and Vulnerability
resolves10.2134/jeq2005.0377
Mapping Ground Water Vulnerability to Pesticide Leaching with a Process‐Based Metamodel of EuroPEARL
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.022
Evaluating different GCMs for predicting spatial recharge in an irrigated arid region
resolves10.4296/cwrj1801025
AQUIFER VULNERABILITY INDEX: A GIS - COMPATIBLE METHOD FOR GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY MAPPING
resolves10.1023/B:WARE.0000046896.98274.07
Regional Estimation of Fresh Groundwater Vulnerability: Methodological Aspects and Practical Applications
The 25 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAller, L., Rennett, T., Lehr, J. H., & Petty, R. J. (1985). DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. Washington: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/2-85/018.
no DOI — not checkedCanter, L. W. (1997). Nitrates in Groundwater. CRC Lewis. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=79Bg5ikEPjgC
no DOI — not checkedChen, X., & Lackey, S. O. (2010). Streambed hydrology tests in the Upper Elkhorn River between Stuart and Neligh. Nebraska: Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. 28 p.
no DOI — not checkedCivita, M. (1993). Groundwater vulnerability maps: a review. In Proceedings IX Symposium Pesticide Chemistry, Mobility and degradation of xenobiotics (p. p. 832). Presented at the In: Del Re, A.A.M., Capri, E., Evans, S.P., Natali, P., Trevisan, M (Eds.), Biagini, Lucca, Italy.pp. 832.
no DOI — not checkedConservation and Survey Division (CSD), University of Nebraska-Lincoln (1973). Topographic regions map of Nebraska. Online retrieved on June 1, 2013 at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1062 &context=caripubs&sei-redir=1 .
no DOI — not checkedDappen, P., & Merchant, J. (2004). GIS-Based modeling of groundwater pollution risk: new and improved approaches. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Images to Decisions: Remote Sensing Foundations for GIS Applications, September 12–16, 2004, Kansas City, MO.
no DOI — not checkedFerguson, R. B. (2006). Nutrient management for agronomic crops in Nebraska. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension. EC06-155.
no DOI — not checkedFocazio M. J., Reilly T. E., Rupert M. G., & Helsel D. R. (2002). Assessing ground-water vulnerability to contamination: Providing scientifically defensible information for decision makers. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1224, online Retrieved on April 23, 2009, from http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2002/circ1224/ .
no DOI — not checkedFoster S. S. D. (1987). Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy, in W. van Duijvanbooden and H.G. van Waegeningh (eds.), Vulnerability of Soil and Groundwater to Pollution, Proceedings and Information No. 38 of the International Conference (pp. 69–86). Netherlands: TNO Committee on Hydrological Research.
no DOI — not checkedFrenzel S. A., Swanson R. B., Huntzinger T. L., Stamer J. K., Emmons P. J., et al. (1998). Water quality in the Central Nebraska Basins, Nebraska, 1992–95: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1163, online Retrieved on May 29, 2010, online retrieved from http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/circ1163/circ1163.pdf .
no DOI — not checkedHelsel D. R., & Hirsch R. M. (2002). Statistical methods in water resources. Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, Book 4, chapter A3. U.S. Geological Survey, pp. 522.
no DOI — not checkedLackey, S. O., & Chen, X. (2010). Streambed hydrology tests in the Lower Elkhorn River and its tributaries. Nebraska: Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. 50 p.
no DOI — not checkedMerchant, J. W. (1994). GIS-based groundwater pollution hazard assessment: a critical review of the DRASTIC model. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(9), 1117–1128.
no DOI — not checkedMerchant, J., & Dappen, P. (2013). Remote Sensing Enables Modeling of Groundwater Pollution Risk. In Environmental Change: Meeting the Challenges with Remote Sensing Imagery (R. Dodge and R. Congalton, eds.) (pp. 54–57). Alexandria, VA: American Geosciences Institute.
no DOI — not checkedNational Research Council. (1993). Groundwater vulnerability assessment: Contamination potential under conditions of uncertainties. Washington, D.C., 158pp.
no DOI — not checkedNational Research Council. (2000). Investigating groundwater systems on regional and national scales. Washington: National Academy Press. 158 pp.
no DOI — not checkedNebraska Department of Environmental Quality (NDEQ). (2009). 2009 Nebraska groundwater quality monitoring report (p. 48). Nebraska: Lincoln.
no DOI — not checkedNebraska Department of Natural Resources (NDNR). (2009). Report summary, 2010 annual evaluation of availability of hydrologically connected water supplies, pp. 24. Retrieved on May 29, 2013, from http://www.dnr.state.ne.us/IWM/docs/IWM_AnnualReports.html .
no DOI — not checkedNebraska Natural Resources Commission. (1986). Policy issue study on integrated management of surface water and groundwater, state water planning and review process: integrated management of surface water and groundwater report : a report of the Director of Natural Resources to Governor Robert Kerrey and the members of the Nebraska Legislature: State Water Planning and Review Process, pp 139.
no DOI — not checkedRaines, G. L., Bonham-Carter, G. F., & Kemp, L. D. (2000). Predictive probabilistic modeling using ArcView GIS. ArcUser, 3(2), 45–48.
no DOI — not checkedRupert, M. (1999). Improvements to the DRASTIC ground-water vulnerability mapping method. USGS Fact Sheet FS-066-99, Boise, Idaho. Online retrieved on June 1, 2013 at http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/fs06699 .
no DOI — not checkedSampat, P. (2000). Groundwater shock: The polluting of the world’s major freshwater stores. World Watch, 13(1), 10–22.
no DOI — not checkedSnyder, D. T. (2008). Estimated depth to ground water and configuration of the water table in the Portland, Oregon Area. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5059, Online retrieved on June 1, 2013 from http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2008/5059/ .
no DOI — not checkedSteyaert, L. T., & Goodchild, M. F. (1994). Integrating geographic information systems and environmental simulation models: A status review. In W. K. Michener, J. W. Brunt, & S. G. Stafford (Eds.), Environmental Information Management and Analysis: Ecosystem to Global Scales (pp. 333–356). Bristol: Taylor & Francis.
no DOI — not checkedUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln. (2000). Quality-assessed agrichemical contaminant database for Nebraska ground water. A cooperative project of the Nebraska Departments of Agriculture, Environmental Quality, and Natural Resources and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, http://dnrdata.dnr.ne.gov/clearinghouse/index.asp , updated May 1, 2008.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-10 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11270-014-2214-4"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11270-014-2214-4/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11270-014-2214-4)