Reference health
Carbon and water footprint of coffee consumed in Finland—life cycle assessment
2 of 25 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-23
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
35 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2760/002447
does not resolve to a known work10.1002/1099-1018(200009/10)24:53.0.CO;2-7
The 23 checked references that resolve
resolves10.3920/978-90-8686-788-2_3
Chapter 3. The carbon footprint of coffee production chains in Tolima, Colombia
resolves10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8
The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE)
resolves10.1007/s11367-008-0056-2
The role of flexible packaging in the life cycle of coffee and butter
resolves10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v18n11p1116-1123
Drip irrigation in coffee crop under different planting densities: Growth and yield in southeastern Brazil
resolves10.2166/wcc.2013.035
A methodology for quantifying global consumptive water use of coffee for sustainable production under conditions of climate change
resolves10.1065/lca2004.10.181.1
The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp)
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.006
Product carbon footprint and energy analysis of alternative coffee products in Japan
resolves10.1007/s10533-008-9222-7
Fluxes of greenhouse gases from Andosols under coffee in monoculture or shaded by Inga densiflora in Costa Rica
resolves10.1111/jiec.12487
Environmental Implications of Consumer Convenience: Coffee as a Case Study
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.011
Life cycle assessment of spray dried soluble coffee and comparison with alternatives (drip filter and capsule espresso)
resolves10.1007/s11367-012-0519-3
Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment
resolves10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.142
A comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) of Jatropha biodiesel production in India
resolves10.1007/s11367-009-0144-y
Climatic impact of land use in LCA—carbon transfers between vegetation/soil and air
resolves10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.019
Greenhouse gas emissions in coffee grown with differing input levels under conventional and organic management
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.031
Monthly water stress: spatially and temporally explicit consumptive water footprint of global crop production
resolves10.1126/science.aaq0216
Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers
resolves10.1590/0103-8478cr20170170
Economic profitability in conventional and irrigated coffee production systems in three municipalities in the Marilia region of São Paulo, Brazil
resolves10.1007/s11367-018-1512-2
Applying water scarcity footprint methodologies to milk production in Finland
resolves10.1029/2005GB002469
Nitrogen availability and soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions following conversion of forests to coffee in southern Sumatra
The 35 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBlonk Agri-footprint BV (2014) Agri-Footprint - Part 2 - Description of data - Version 1.0. Gouda, the Netherlands
no DOI — not checkedBSI (2011) PAS 2050:2011 Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. http://www.balas.org/BALAS_2013_proceedings_data/data/documents/p639212.pdf
no DOI — not checkedBSI (2012) Pas 2050–1:2012. In: Assessment of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from horticultural products - supplementary requirements for the cradle to gate stages of GHG assessments of horticultural products undertaken in accordance with PAS 2050. British Standards Institution, London
no DOI — not checkedChayer J-A, Kicak K (2015) Life cycle Assesment of coffee consumption: comparison of single-serve coffee and bulk coffee brewing. Final report, Quantis
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Aluminium Association (2018) Environmental profile report. Life cycle inventory data for aluminiun production and transformation processes in Europe February 2018 https://gallery.mailchimp.com/70e96d501ea1c933ba2a3440d/files/041ea6b6-d5ef-4e04-9f70-ae3c0d196058/Full_Environmental_Profile_Report_2018.pdf
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission (2010) Commission decision of 10 June 2010 on guidelines for the calculation of land carbon stocks for the purpose of Annex V to Directive 2009/28/EC, Official Journal of the European Union. L 151/19
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission (2013) Commission Recommendation of 9 April 2013 on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (2013/179/EU). Official Journal of the European Union 56(L 124)
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission (2018) Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules Guidance. Version 6.3. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/PEFCR_OEFSR_en.htm#reports-footprint
no DOI — not checkedEuropen Environment Agency (2018) Overview of electricity production and use in Europe. https://www.eea.europa.eu/downloads/197d768aa294450eaa464d17b56c3dfc/1556552580/assessment-4.pdf
no DOI — not checkedFAOSTAT (2018) FAOSTAT – Crops. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat
no DOI — not checkedFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2010) Global Forest Resource Assessment. Available at: http://www.fao.org/forest-resources-assessment/past-assessments/fra-2010/en/
no DOI — not checkedFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2015) FAO Statistical Pocketbook Coffee 2015. Available at: https://www.fao.org/3/a-i4985e.pdf
no DOI — not checkedFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2018) FAOSTAT. FAO https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize.
no DOI — not checkedICO (2014) World coffee trade (1963–2013): A review of the markets, challenges and opportunities facing the sector. International Coffee Council 112th Session 3–7 March 2014 London, United Kingdom
no DOI — not checkedInternational Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) (2006a) ISO 14040, Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva
no DOI — not checkedInternational Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) (2006b) ISO 14044, Environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva
no DOI — not checkedInternational Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) (2014) ISO 14046, Environmental management –water footprint – principles, requirements and guidelines. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva
no DOI — not checkedIPCC (2006) IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4, “Agriculture, forestry and other land use”. Hayama: IGES, 2006. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html
no DOI — not checkedIPCC (2019) Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4, “Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use”. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2019rf/vol4.html
no DOI — not checkedKillian B, Rivera L, Soto M, Navichoc D (2013) Carbon footprint across the coffee supply chain: the case of Costa Rican coffee. J Agric Sci Technol B3:151–170
no DOI — not checkedLighart TN, Ansems AMM (2007) Single use cups or reusable (coffee) drinking systems: an environmental comparison. TNO Built Environment and Geosciences. Intended for Benelux Disposables Foundation
no DOI — not checkedMyhre G, Shindell D, Bréon F-M, Collins W, Fuglestvedt J, Huang J, Koch D, Lamarque J-F, Lee D, Mendoza B, Nakajima T, Robock A, Stephens G, Takemura T, Zhang H (2013) Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York
no DOI — not checkedNatural Resources Insitute Finland (Luke) (2018). Luke internal datasets. Luke, 2018
no DOI — not checkedOfficial Statistics of Finland (OSF) (2016) Energy supply and consumption [e-publication] ISSN=1799-7976. 2016 http://wwwstatfi/til/ehk/2016/ehk_2016_2017-12-08_tie_001_enhtml Accessed 24 April 2018
no DOI — not checkedPlastics Europe (2018) www.plasticseurope.com
no DOI — not checkedRefiller B (2018) Life-cycle assessment: reusable mugs vs. disposable cups http://studylibnet/doc/18333667/lifecycle-assessment%2D%2Dreusable-mugs-vs-disposable-cups Accessed 21 February 2018
no DOI — not checkedSalomone R (2003) Life cycle assessment applied to coffee production: investigating environmental impacts to aid decision making for improvements at company level. Food Agric Environ 1(2):295–300
no DOI — not checkedShibasaki M (2017) Life cycle assessment of plastics &GaBi software
no DOI — not checkedSegura MA, Andrare HJ (2012) Huella de carbono en cadenas productivas de café (Coffea arabica L.) con diferentes estándares de certificación en Costa Rica. Revista Luna Azul 35:60–77
no DOI — not checkedSilvennoinen K, Hartikainen H, Katajajuuri J-M, Nisonen S, Pietiläinen O, Timonen K (2017) Wastestimator Ruokahävikin päivitetyt mittaustulokset ja ruokahävikin seurantatyökalun kehittäminen: kotitaloudet ja ravitsemuspalvelut. Luonnonvarakeskus Unpublished research
no DOI — not checkedStatista (2015) World coffee consumption by country 2015. https://www.statista.com/statistics/277135/leading-countries-by-coffee-consumption/
no DOI — not checkedSualeh A, Dawid J (2014) Relationship of fruit and bean sizes and processing methods on the conversion ratios of Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) cultivars. Time J Agric Vet Sci 2(2):70–74
no DOI — not checkedTsiamis DA, Marco J, Castaldi MJ (2016) Determining accurate heating values of non-recycled plastics (NRP). Earth Engineering Center, City College, City University of New York. https://plastics.americanchemistry.com/Energy-Values-Non-Recycled-Plastics.pdf
no DOI — not checkedUSDA (2017) Coffee: world markets and trade. United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service. Coffee Summary. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/coffee.pdf
no DOI — not checkedWorldatlas (2018) https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/top-10-coffee-consuming-nations.html
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11367-020-01799-5"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11367-020-01799-5/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11367-020-01799-5)