Reference health

Are day traders bias free?—evidence from internet stock message boards

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-008-9063-1
CiteStamped reference-health badge
28/28 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-04

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

15 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 28 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00662.x
Is All That Talk Just Noise? The Information Content of Internet Stock Message Boards
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.01.002
Information content of equity analyst reports
resolves10.1257/jep.15.1.41
The Internet and the Investor
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00336
Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Security Analyst Recommendations and Stock Returns
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.10.001
Buys, holds, and sells: The distribution of investment banks’ stock ratings and the implications for the profitability of analysts’ recommendations
resolves10.3115/1067807.1067811
Comparison of alignment templates and maximum entropy models for natural language understanding
resolves10.2307/3666148
Optimism Biases among Brokerage and Non-Brokerage Firms' Equity Recommendations: Agency Costs in the Investment Industry
resolves10.3115/1034678.1034719
Analysis system of speech acts and discourse structures using maximum entropy model
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1070.0704
Yahoo! for Amazon: Sentiment Extraction from Small Talk on the Web
resolves10.2139/ssrn.286597
Technology, Information Production, and Market Efficiency
resolves10.1162/00335530360698469
Persuasion Bias, Social Influence, and Unidimensional Opinions
resolves10.1111/j.0824-7935.2004.t01-1-00228.x
A Multiple Resampling Method for Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets
resolves10.1023/A:1009778005914
On Bias, Variance, 0/1—Loss, and the Curse-of-Dimensionality
resolves10.2139/ssrn.975985
Online Broker Investors: Demographic Information, Investment Strategy, Portfolio Positions, and Trading Activity
resolves10.2469/faj.v56.n1.2331
How “Foolish” Are Internet Investors?
resolves10.3233/IDA-2002-6504
The class imbalance problem: A systematic study1
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00657.x
Analyzing the Analysts: When Do Recommendations Add Value?
resolves10.1145/323830.323842
The implications of online investing
resolves10.3115/1075671.1075695
Adaptive language modeling using the maximum entropy principle
resolves10.1093/rfs/12.4.653
Conflict of Interest and the Credibility of Underwriter Analyst Recommendations
resolves10.1257/aer.89.5.1279
Do Investors Trade Too Much?
resolves10.1006/csla.1996.0011
A maximum entropy approach to adaptive statistical language modelling
resolves10.1145/505282.505283
Machine learning in automated text categorization
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05002.x
The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence
resolves10.1111/1468-0416.11403
Internet Message Board Activity and Market Efficiency: A Case Study of the Internet Service Sector using RagingBull.Com
resolves10.2469/faj.v57.n3.2449
News or Noise? Internet Postings and Stock Prices
resolves10.1108/03074350110767295
Impact of Internet on financial services industry: a case study of on‐line investing
resolves10.2139/ssrn.160170
Cheap Talk on the Web: The Determinants of Postings on Stock Message Boards
The 15 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAdmati AR, Pfleiderer PC (2001) Disclosing information on the internet: is it noise or is it news? Technical report, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University
no DOI — not checkedBerger AL, Della Pietra VJ, Della Pietra SA (1996) A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Comput Linguist 22(1):39–71
no DOI — not checkedDas SR, Chen MY (2003) Yahoo! for Amazon: sentiment parsing from small talk on the Web, Proceedings of the 8th Asia Pacific Finance Association annual conference, Working paper
no DOI — not checkedFernandez R, Ginzburg J, Lappin S (2005) Using machine learning for non-sentential utterance classification. Proceedings of the Sixth SIGDJIAl Workshop on Discourse and DJIAlogue, Lisbon, 77–86
no DOI — not checkedGu B, Konana P, Liu A, Rajagopalan B, Ghosh J (2006) Predictive value of stock message board sentiments, working paper. the University of Texas at Austin
no DOI — not checkedJoachimes T (1997) A probabilistic analysis of the rocchio algorithm with TFIDF for text categorization. In Proceedings of Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 143–151, Nashiville, TN, 1997. Morgan Kaufmann
no DOI — not checkedKomaromi G (2002) Why have the stock markets become noisier after the revolution of information and technology. In Evolutions of Institutions and the Knowledge Economy Conference Proceedings. University of Debrecen
no DOI — not checkedKoski JL, Rice EM, Tarhouni A (2007) Noise trading and volatility: evidence from day trading and message boards, working paper, University of Washington
no DOI — not checkedMcCallum AK (1996) Bow: A toolkit for statistical language modeling, text retrieval, classification and clustering, http://www.cs.cmu.edu/∼mccallum/bow
no DOI — not checkedOh NY, Parwada JT, Walter TS (2004) Online investors’ trading behaviour and performance: evidence from the Korean equity market. Working paper, University of New South Wales
no DOI — not checkedPettibone J, Pon-Barry H (2003) A maximum entropy approach to recognizing discourse relations in spoken language. Working paper, The Stanford Natural Language Processing Group. June 6
no DOI — not checkedRatnaparkhi A (1997) A simple introduction to maximum entropy models for natural language processing. Technical Report 97-08, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science. University of Pennsylvania
no DOI — not checkedRatnaparkhi A (1998) Maximum entropy models for natural language ambiguity resolution, PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania
no DOI — not checkedRennie JDM, Shih L, Teevan J, Karger DR (2003) Tackling the poor assumptions of naive Bayes text classifiers. In: Fawcett T, Mishra N (eds), International Conference on machine learning, Washington D.C, Morgan Kaufmann
no DOI — not checkedSabherwal S, Sarkar KS, Zhang Y (2008) Online-talk, does it matter? Manage Finance 34(6):423–436. doi: 10.1108/03074350810872813
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-04 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s12197-008-9063-1"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s12197-008-9063-1/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s12197-008-9063-1/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s12197-008-9063-1)