Reference health

Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability to pollution using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-4001-3
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 56 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-10

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

16 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

marked retracted — notice via Crossref, record curated by Retraction Watch10.1007/s12665-013-3012-9
Use of a new method for determining the vulnerability and risk of pollution of major groundwater reservoirs in the region of Annaba–Bouteldja (NE Algeria)
The 55 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2919-5
Sources and transports of organochlorine pesticides in the Nanshan underground river, China
resolves10.1007/s10040-008-0280-7
Groundwater vulnerability assessment and evaluation of human activity impact (HAI) within the Dead Sea groundwater basin, Jordan
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.022
Assessment of intrinsic vulnerability to contamination for Gaza coastal aquifer, Palestine
resolves10.1007/s00254-002-0645-5
Evaluation of aquifer vulnerability to contamination potential using the DRASTIC method
resolves10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.05.006
Ranking suitable sites for irrigation with reclaimed water in the Nabeul-Hammamet region (Tunisia) using GIS and AHP-multicriteria decision analysis
resolves10.1007/s12665-012-1910-x
The weight of interaction of mining activities: groundwater in environmental impact assessment using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP)
resolves10.1007/s00254-006-0219-z
Vulnerability assessment for the Gaza Strip, Palestine using DRASTIC
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.11.005
A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan
resolves10.1007/s12665-012-1869-7
GIS-based land suitability analysis integrating multi-criteria evaluation for the allocation of potential pollution sources
resolves10.1007/978-1-4615-1593-7
Evaluation and Decision Models
resolves10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP
resolves10.1007/s11269-008-9319-8
A GIS-based DRASTIC Model for Assessing Aquifer Vulnerability in Kherran Plain, Khuzestan, Iran
resolves10.1007/s002540050446
Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments: a new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method)
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2581-y
An aquifer vulnerability assessment of the Benin Formation aquifer, Calabar, southeastern Nigeria, using DRASTIC and GIS approach
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2698-z
First outcomes in the definition of groundwater protection zones at the Viñales National Park (Cuba) and surrounding area
resolves10.1007/s100400000068
Sensitivity analysis for the EPIK method of vulnerability assessment in a small karstic aquifer, southern Belgium
resolves10.1007/s12665-014-3192-y
Leaching and dilution of fertilizers in the Yucatan karstic aquifer
resolves10.1007/s12665-014-3191-z
Intrinsic vulnerability assessment of Saturnia thermal aquifer by means of three parametric methods: SINTACS, GODS and COP
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.008
Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: A case study in Beijing, China
resolves10.1029/WR018i001p00014
Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation
resolves10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004
Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications – A literature review
resolves10.1007/s100400100141
Vulnerability of groundwater to acid deposition, Jizerské Mountains, northern Czech Republic: construction and reliability of a GIS-based vulnerability map
resolves10.1007/s10661-007-0104-6
Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the coastal region of Oman using DRASTIC index method in GIS environment
resolves10.1108/09576050310503367
Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP
resolves10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00099-9
Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00607.x
Correlation Between DRASTIC Vulnerabilities and Incidents of VOC Contamination of Municipal Wells in Nebraska
resolves10.1007/s100400050195
Assessment of the potential for groundwater contamination using the DRASTIC/EGIS technique, Cheongju area, South Korea
resolves10.1007/s12665-012-2180-3
Increase of vulnerability of karst aquifers due to leakage from landfills
resolves10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00095-1
Evaluating factors influencing groundwater vulnerability to nitrate pollution: developing the potential of GIS
resolves10.1007/s00254-003-0803-4
Evaluation of waste disposal site using the DRASTIC system in Southern Korea
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.067
A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP)/data envelopment analysis (DEA) hybrid model for efficiently allocating energy R&D resources: In the case of energy technologies against high oil prices
resolves10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00111-7
Predicting groundwater nitrate concentrations in a region of mixed agricultural land use: a comparison of three approaches
resolves10.13031/2013.17343
GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT TO NON-POINT SOURCE NITRATE POLLUTION ON A REGIONAL SCALE USING GIS
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2690-7
Estimating groundwater vulnerability to pollution using a modified DRASTIC model in the Kerman agricultural area, Iran
resolves10.1007/s10040-005-0008-x
Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2321-3
Assessment and mapping of the intrinsic vulnerability to pollution: an example from Keritis River Basin (Northwestern crete, Greece)
resolves10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.08.004
An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setúbal Peninsula, Portugal
resolves10.1016/j.apgeog.2007.07.008
A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2436-6
Stratigraphic architecture and anthropic impacts on subsoil to assess the intrinsic potential vulnerability of groundwater: the northeastern Campania Plain case study, southern Italy
resolves10.3133/fs06699
Improvements to the DRASTIC ground-water vulnerability mapping method
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02350.x
Calibration of the DRASTIC Ground Water Vulnerability Mapping Method
resolves10.5539/jsd.v3n2p140
Assessment of Groundwater Pollution Potential of the Datong Basin, Northern China
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2696-1
An evaluation of aquifer vulnerability in two nitrate sensitive areas of Catalonia (NE Spain) based on electrical resistivity methods
resolves10.1007/s10040-012-0947-y
Assessment of groundwater vulnerability based on a modified DRASTIC model, GIS and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method: the case of Egirdir Lake basin (Isparta, Turkey)
resolves10.1007/s10040-009-0497-0
Assessment of aquifer vulnerability based on GIS and DRASTIC methods: a case study of the Senirkent-Uluborlu Basin (Isparta, Turkey)
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2360-9
Groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Melaka State of Malaysia using DRASTIC and GIS techniques
resolves10.1007/s10661-006-9312-8
IWQ Index: A GIS-Integrated Technique to Assess Irrigation Water Quality
resolves10.1016/j.psep.2013.11.005
Fuzzy AHP approach to selection problems in process engineering involving quantitative and qualitative aspects
resolves10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80083-9
The use of parametric programming in fuzzy linear programming
resolves10.4296/cwrj1801025
AQUIFER VULNERABILITY INDEX: A GIS - COMPATIBLE METHOD FOR GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY MAPPING
resolves10.1007/s10661-009-1302-1
Application of water quality index for groundwater quality assessment: Thirumanimuttar sub-basin, Tamilnadu, India
resolves10.1007/s00254-004-1185-y
A comparative study of four schemes for groundwater vulnerability mapping in a diffuse flow carbonate aquifer under Mediterranean climatic conditions
resolves10.1007/s10040-006-0023-6
Proposed method for groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karstic) aquifers: the COP method
resolves10.1007/s00254-008-1421-y
A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing shallow groundwater vulnerability in the Zhangye Basin, northwestern China
resolves10.1007/s12665-012-1945-z
A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in the Ordos Plateau, China
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAller L, Bennet T, Leher JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydro-geological settings. EPA 600/2-87-035:622
no DOI — not checkedChang DY (1992) Extent analysis and synthetic decision. Optimiz Tech Appl 1:352
no DOI — not checkedCivita M (1994) Le carte dellavulnerabilit`adegliacquiferi all’ inquinamiento: teoria e pratica [Contamination vulnerability mapping of the aquifer: theory and practice]. Quaderni di Tecniche di ProtezioneAmbientale, Pitagora
no DOI — not checkedDoerfliger N, Zwahlen F (1998) Groundwater vulnerability mapping in karstic regions (EPIK): application to Groundwater Protection Zones. Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), Switzerland
no DOI — not checkedFarfan H (2010) Evaluación de los recursos hídricos del Parque Nacional Viñales, Cuba. M.Sc Thesis. University of Alcala´
no DOI — not checkedFoster SSD (1987) Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: van Duijvanbooden W, van Waegeningh HG (eds) Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollution, Proceedings and Information No. 38 of the International Conference held in the Netherlands, in 1987, TNO Committee on Hydrological Research
no DOI — not checkedGoldscheider N, Klute M, Sturm S, Hotzl H (2000) The PI method: a GIS-based approach to mapping groundwater vulnerability with special consideration of karst aquifers. Z Angew Geol 46(3):157–166
no DOI — not checkedJavadi S, Kavehkar N, Mousavizadeh MH, Mohammadi K (2011) Modification of DRASTIC model to map groundwater vulnerability to pollution using nitrate measurements in agricultural areas. J Agr Sci Tech 13:239–249
no DOI — not checkedKong F, Liu H (2005) Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate success factors of e-commerce. Int J Inform Syst Sci Comput Inform 1(3–4):406–412
no DOI — not checkedNapolitano P, Fabbri AG (1996) Single parameter sensitivity analysis for aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and SINTACS. In: Kovar K, Nachtnebel HP (eds) Proc HydroGIS: application of geographical information systems in hydrology and water resources management, IAHS Publ. 235, IAHS, Wallingford, UK, pp 559–566
no DOI — not checkedÖzdağoğlu A, Özdağoğlu G (2007) Comparison of AHP and fuzzy AHP for the multicriteria decision making precess with linguistic elevations. Istanbul Trade Univ J Sci 11:65–85
no DOI — not checkedÖzgül B (2000) Hydrogeological investigations of Şuhut basin. Suleyman Demirel University, Master thesis, Isparta/Turkey (in Turkish)
no DOI — not checkedPlymale CL, Angle MP (2002) Groundwater pollution potential of Fulton County, Ohio. Ohio Department of natural resources division of water, water resources section. Groundwater Pollution Potential, Report No 4
no DOI — not checkedSaaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 287
no DOI — not checkedTesoriero AJ, Inkpen EL, Voss FD (1998) Assessing ground-water vulnerability using logistic regression. In: Proceedings for the Source Water Assessment and Protection 98 Conference, Dallas, TX, pp 157–165
no DOI — not checkedTseng ML, Lin YH, Chiu ASF, Chen CY (2008) Fuzzy AHP approach to TQM strategy evaluation. IEMS 7(1):34–43
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-10 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s12665-014-4001-3"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s12665-014-4001-3/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s12665-014-4001-3/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s12665-014-4001-3)