At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in
Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the
registry record that put it there.
The 55 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/s10040-008-0280-7Groundwater vulnerability assessment and evaluation of human activity impact (HAI) within the Dead Sea groundwater basin, Jordan
resolves10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.05.006Ranking suitable sites for irrigation with reclaimed water in the Nabeul-Hammamet region (Tunisia) using GIS and AHP-multicriteria decision analysis
resolves10.1007/s12665-012-1910-xThe weight of interaction of mining activities: groundwater in environmental impact assessment using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP)
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.11.005A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan
resolves10.1007/s12665-012-1869-7GIS-based land suitability analysis integrating multi-criteria evaluation for the allocation of potential pollution sources
resolves10.1007/s11269-008-9319-8A GIS-based DRASTIC Model for Assessing Aquifer Vulnerability in Kherran Plain, Khuzestan, Iran
resolves10.1007/s002540050446Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments: a new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method)
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2581-yAn aquifer vulnerability assessment of the Benin Formation aquifer, Calabar, southeastern Nigeria, using DRASTIC and GIS approach
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2698-zFirst outcomes in the definition of groundwater protection zones at the Viñales National Park (Cuba) and surrounding area
resolves10.1007/s100400000068Sensitivity analysis for the EPIK method of vulnerability assessment in a small karstic aquifer, southern Belgium
resolves10.1007/s12665-014-3191-zIntrinsic vulnerability assessment of Saturnia thermal aquifer by means of three parametric methods: SINTACS, GODS and COP
resolves10.1029/WR018i001p00014Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation
resolves10.1007/s100400100141Vulnerability of groundwater to acid deposition, Jizerské Mountains, northern Czech Republic: construction and reliability of a GIS-based vulnerability map
resolves10.1007/s10661-007-0104-6Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the coastal region of Oman using DRASTIC index method in GIS environment
resolves10.1007/s100400050195Assessment of the potential for groundwater contamination using the DRASTIC/EGIS technique, Cheongju area, South Korea
resolves10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00095-1Evaluating factors influencing groundwater vulnerability to nitrate pollution: developing the potential of GIS
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.067A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP)/data envelopment analysis (DEA) hybrid model for efficiently allocating energy R&D resources: In the case of energy technologies against high oil prices
resolves10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00111-7Predicting groundwater nitrate concentrations in a region of mixed agricultural land use: a comparison of three approaches
resolves10.13031/2013.17343GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT TO NON-POINT SOURCE NITRATE POLLUTION ON A REGIONAL SCALE USING GIS
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2690-7Estimating groundwater vulnerability to pollution using a modified DRASTIC model in the Kerman agricultural area, Iran
resolves10.1007/s10040-005-0008-xOptimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2321-3Assessment and mapping of the intrinsic vulnerability to pollution: an example from Keritis River Basin (Northwestern crete, Greece)
resolves10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.08.004An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setúbal Peninsula, Portugal
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2436-6Stratigraphic architecture and anthropic impacts on subsoil to assess the intrinsic potential vulnerability of groundwater: the northeastern Campania Plain case study, southern Italy
resolves10.3133/fs06699Improvements to the DRASTIC ground-water vulnerability mapping method
resolves10.5539/jsd.v3n2p140Assessment of Groundwater Pollution Potential of the Datong Basin, Northern China
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2696-1An evaluation of aquifer vulnerability in two nitrate sensitive areas of Catalonia (NE Spain) based on electrical resistivity methods
resolves10.1007/s10040-012-0947-yAssessment of groundwater vulnerability based on a modified DRASTIC model, GIS and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method: the case of Egirdir Lake basin (Isparta, Turkey)
resolves10.1007/s10040-009-0497-0Assessment of aquifer vulnerability based on GIS and DRASTIC methods: a case study of the Senirkent-Uluborlu Basin (Isparta, Turkey)
resolves10.1007/s12665-013-2360-9Groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Melaka State of Malaysia using DRASTIC and GIS techniques
resolves10.1016/j.psep.2013.11.005Fuzzy AHP approach to selection problems in process engineering involving quantitative and qualitative aspects
resolves10.4296/cwrj1801025AQUIFER VULNERABILITY INDEX: A GIS - COMPATIBLE METHOD FOR GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY MAPPING
resolves10.1007/s10661-009-1302-1Application of water quality index for groundwater quality assessment: Thirumanimuttar sub-basin, Tamilnadu, India
resolves10.1007/s00254-004-1185-yA comparative study of four schemes for groundwater vulnerability mapping in a diffuse flow carbonate aquifer under Mediterranean climatic conditions
resolves10.1007/s10040-006-0023-6Proposed method for groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karstic) aquifers: the COP method
resolves10.1007/s00254-008-1421-yA GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing shallow groundwater vulnerability in the Zhangye Basin, northwestern China
resolves10.1007/s12665-012-1945-zA GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in the Ordos Plateau, China
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAller L, Bennet T, Leher JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydro-geological settings. EPA 600/2-87-035:622
no DOI — not checkedChang DY (1992) Extent analysis and synthetic decision. Optimiz Tech Appl 1:352
no DOI — not checkedCivita M (1994) Le carte dellavulnerabilit`adegliacquiferi all’ inquinamiento: teoria e pratica [Contamination vulnerability mapping of the aquifer: theory and practice]. Quaderni di Tecniche di ProtezioneAmbientale, Pitagora
no DOI — not checkedDoerfliger N, Zwahlen F (1998) Groundwater vulnerability mapping in karstic regions (EPIK): application to Groundwater Protection Zones. Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), Switzerland
no DOI — not checkedFarfan H (2010) Evaluación de los recursos hídricos del Parque Nacional Viñales, Cuba. M.Sc Thesis. University of Alcala´
no DOI — not checkedFoster SSD (1987) Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: van Duijvanbooden W, van Waegeningh HG (eds) Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollution, Proceedings and Information No. 38 of the International Conference held in the Netherlands, in 1987, TNO Committee on Hydrological Research
no DOI — not checkedGoldscheider N, Klute M, Sturm S, Hotzl H (2000) The PI method: a GIS-based approach to mapping groundwater vulnerability with special consideration of karst aquifers. Z Angew Geol 46(3):157–166
no DOI — not checkedJavadi S, Kavehkar N, Mousavizadeh MH, Mohammadi K (2011) Modification of DRASTIC model to map groundwater vulnerability to pollution using nitrate measurements in agricultural areas. J Agr Sci Tech 13:239–249
no DOI — not checkedKong F, Liu H (2005) Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate success factors of e-commerce. Int J Inform Syst Sci Comput Inform 1(3–4):406–412
no DOI — not checkedNapolitano P, Fabbri AG (1996) Single parameter sensitivity analysis for aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and SINTACS. In: Kovar K, Nachtnebel HP (eds) Proc HydroGIS: application of geographical information systems in hydrology and water resources management, IAHS Publ. 235, IAHS, Wallingford, UK, pp 559–566
no DOI — not checkedÖzdağoğlu A, Özdağoğlu G (2007) Comparison of AHP and fuzzy AHP for the multicriteria decision making precess with linguistic elevations. Istanbul Trade Univ J Sci 11:65–85
no DOI — not checkedÖzgül B (2000) Hydrogeological investigations of Şuhut basin. Suleyman Demirel University, Master thesis, Isparta/Turkey (in Turkish)
no DOI — not checkedPlymale CL, Angle MP (2002) Groundwater pollution potential of Fulton County, Ohio. Ohio Department of natural resources division of water, water resources section. Groundwater Pollution Potential, Report No 4
no DOI — not checkedSaaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 287
no DOI — not checkedTesoriero AJ, Inkpen EL, Voss FD (1998) Assessing ground-water vulnerability using logistic regression. In: Proceedings for the Source Water Assessment and Protection 98 Conference, Dallas, TX, pp 157–165
no DOI — not checkedTseng ML, Lin YH, Chiu ASF, Chen CY (2008) Fuzzy AHP approach to TQM strategy evaluation. IEMS 7(1):34–43
checked 2026-08-10 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.