Reference health
Revisiting Research and Development Expenditures and Trade Adjusted Emissions: Green Innovation and Renewable Energy R&D Role for Developed Countries
73/73 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
17 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 73 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105942
Does democracy really improve environmental quality? Empirical contribution to the environmental politics debate
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118245
Reducing carbon emissions: The role of renewable energy and democracy
resolves10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08941
The influence of renewable energy usage on consumption-based carbon emissions in MINT economies
resolves10.1002/ijfe.2049
The impacts of R&D investment and stock markets on clean‐energy consumption and <scp>CO<sub>2</sub></scp> emissions in <scp>OECD</scp> economies
resolves10.1002/ieam.4516
The asymmetric effect of renewable energy and trade on consumption-based CO2 emissions: The case of Italy
resolves10.1007/s11356-021-18327-z
The nexus between consumption-based carbon emissions, trade, eco-innovation, and energy productivity: empirical evidence from N-11 economies
resolves10.1007/s11356-021-18088-9
Does foreign direct investment limit trade-adjusted carbon emissions: fresh evidence from global data
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.151
CO 2 emissions, non-renewable and renewable electricity production, economic growth, and international trade in Italy
resolves10.1080/13510347.2012.709684
Democracy, democratization and climate change: complex relationships
resolves10.1007/s11356-021-13084-5
The impact of export composition on environment and energy demand: evidence from newly industrialized countries
resolves10.1007/s13132-021-00778-x
Democracy of Climate and Climate for Democracy: the Evolution of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.060
A novel decomposition analysis of green patent applications for the evaluation of R&D efforts to reduce CO2 emissions from fossil fuel energy consumption
resolves10.1177/0958305X19882382
The influence of democracy on emissions and energy efficiency in America: New evidence from quantile regression analysis
resolves10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.025
Is green energy expensive? Empirical evidence from the Spanish electricity market
resolves10.1080/14693062.2018.1497938
Democracy, electoral systems and emissions: explaining when and why democratization promotes mitigation
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.001
Innovation for sustainability: The impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions
resolves10.2307/1912791
Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods
resolves10.1002/sd.2175
Theoretical Framework for the Carbon Emissions Effects of Technological Progress and Renewable Energy Consumption
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.004
The impact of international trade on CO2 emissions in oil exporting countries: Territory vs consumption emissions accounting
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115893
Environmental regulations, political risk and consumption-based carbon emissions: Evidence from OECD economies
resolves10.1007/s11356-021-15617-4
International trade and consumption-based carbon emissions: evaluating the role of composite risk for RCEP economies
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2019.04.006
The role of trade and FDI for CO2 emissions in Turkey: Nonlinear relationships
resolves10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.020
Consumption-based carbon emissions in Mexico: An analysis using the dual adjustment approach
resolves10.1007/s11356-022-22555-2
Energy mix with technological innovation to abate carbon emission: fresh evidence from Mexico applying wavelet tools and spectral causality
resolves10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102710
Mexico at the crossroads of natural resource dependence and COP26 pledge: Does technological innovation help?
resolves10.1007/s43546-021-00050-z
Inward foreign direct investment in Bangladesh: Do we need to rethink about some of the macro-level quantitative determinants?
resolves10.1080/14786451.2020.1749056
Can small-scale biogas projects mitigate the energy crisis of rural Bangladesh? A study with economic analysis
resolves10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103091
Going away or going green in NAFTA nations? Linking natural resources, energy utilization, and environmental sustainability through the lens of the EKC hypothesis
resolves10.1007/s11356-022-20003-9
Environmental R&D and trade-adjusted carbon emissions: evaluating the role of international trade
resolves10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.020
Democracy and carbon dioxide emissions: Assessing the interactions of political and economic freedom and the environmental Kuznets curve
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138945
Consumption-based carbon emissions and International trade in G7 countries: The role of Environmental innovation and Renewable energy
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104806
Consumption-based carbon emissions and trade nexus: Evidence from nine oil exporting countries
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133887
Energy R&D expenditure, bioethanol consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions in the United States: Non-linear analysis and political implications
resolves10.1007/s11356-019-04712-2
The effect of energy R&D expenditures on CO2 emission reduction: estimation of the STIRPAT model for OECD countries
resolves10.1007/s10668-021-01628-1
The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in China: the role of urbanisation and international trade
resolves10.1080/14693062.2021.1965524
Fossil fuels, climate change, and the COVID-19 crisis: pathways for a just and green post-pandemic recovery
resolves10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.008
Determinants of Carbon Emission in China: How Good is Green Investment?
resolves10.1002/ieam.4530
Environmental performance and international trade in China: The role of renewable energy and eco-innovation
resolves10.1080/1331677X.2022.2028179
Sustainable digital economy and trade adjusted carbon emissions: Evidence from China’s provincial data
resolves10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.045
International trade diversification, green innovation, and consumption-based carbon emissions: The role of renewable energy for sustainable development in BRICST countries
resolves10.1007/s43546-022-00247-w
Causality analysis of the determinants of FDI in Bangladesh: fresh evidence from VAR, VECM and Granger causality approach
resolves10.1021/es072023k
CO<sub>2</sub>Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119187
The impact of R&D expenditures on CO2 emissions: Evidence from sixteen OECD countries
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122138
Do climate technologies and recycling asymmetrically mitigate consumption-based carbon emissions in the United States? New insights from Quantile ARDL
resolves10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101656
Asymmetric inter-linkages between green technology innovation and consumption-based carbon emissions in BRICS countries using quantile-on-quantile framework
resolves10.1016/j.chieco.2014.01.003
International trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and embodied CO2 emissions: A case study of Chinas industrial sectors
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120255
UK's net-zero carbon emissions target: Investigating the potential role of economic growth, financial development, and R&D expenditures based on historical data (1870–2017)
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142538
Does green investment, financial development and natural resources rent limit carbon emissions? A provincial panel analysis of China
resolves10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.159
Interaction between international trade and logistics carbon emissions
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105170
Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on global fossil fuel consumption and CO2 emissions
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110774
Trade and technological innovation: The catalysts for climate change and way forward for COP21
resolves10.1080/1331677X.2020.1860111
Does Energy Productivity and Technological Innovation Limit Trade-Adjusted Carbon Emissions?
resolves10.1007/s11356-021-13345-3
Does technological innovation limit trade-adjusted carbon emissions?
resolves10.1007/s11356-021-18315-3
Quantified impacts of international trade on the United States’ carbon intensity
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.017
Changes of CO 2 emissions embodied in China–Japan trade: drivers and implications
resolves10.1016/j.energy.2020.118048
Do country risks influence carbon dioxide emissions? A non-linear perspective
resolves10.1002/sd.2400
Sustainable development via environmental taxes and efficiency in energy: Evaluating trade adjusted carbon emissions
resolves10.1111/j.1749-124X.2014.12077.x
CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions Embodied in China's Foreign Trade: An Investigation from the Perspective of Global Vertical Specialization
The 17 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedEberhardt, M., & Bond, S. (2009). Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: A novel estimator. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/17692
no DOI — not checkedGlobal Carbon Atlas. (2022). Consumption-based CO2 emissions data. Accessed on October 20, 2022. Available from: CO2 Emissions | Global Carbon Atlas
no DOI — not checkedHeckscher, E. (1919). The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income. Ekonomisk Tidskrift, 11, 497–512.
no DOI — not checkedICRG. (2022). The International Country Risk Guide (ICRG). Accessed August 20, 2022. Available from: The International Country Risk Guide (ICRG) | PRS Group
no DOI — not checkedIEA. (2022). Achieving Net Zero Electricity Sectors in G7 Members. Accessed November 24, 2022. Available from: Executive summary – Achieving Net Zero Electricity Sectors in G7 Members – Analysis - IEA
no DOI — not checkedOEC. (2022). The best place to explore trade data. Accessed November 22, 2022. Available from: The Observatory of Economic Complexity | OEC - The Observatory of Economic Complexity
no DOI — not checkedOECD. (2022a). Carbon dioxide emissions embodied in international trade. Accessed November 20, 2022. Available from: Carbon dioxide emissions embodied in international trade - OECD
no DOI — not checkedOECD. (2022b). Current account balance. Accessed November 20, 2022. Available from: International trade - Current account balance - OECD Data
no DOI — not checkedOECD. (2022c). Gross domestic spending on R&D. Accessed November 20, 2022. Available from: Research and development (R&D) - Gross domestic spending on R&D - OECD Data
no DOI — not checkedOECD Stat. (2022a). Balance of Payment of G-7. Accessed November 20, 2022. Available from: Balance of Payments (BOP6) (oecd.org)
no DOI — not checkedOECD Stat. (2022b). OECD Data Bank. Accessed August 20, 2022. Available from: OECD Statistics
no DOI — not checkedOhlin, B. (1924). The theory of trade. In H. Flam & J. Flanders (Eds.), Heckscher-Ohlin trade theory (pp. 73–214). The MIT Press.
no DOI — not checkedOur World in Data. (2022a). Per capita greenhouse gas emissions: How much does the average person emit? Accessed November 20, 2022. Available from: Greenhouse gas emissions - Our World in Data
no DOI — not checkedOur World in Data. (2022b). Emissions by Sectors. Accessed November 20, 2022. Available from: Emissions by sector - Our World in Data
no DOI — not checkedTeal, F., & Eberhardt, M. (2010). Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production. Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production - ORA - Oxford University Research Archive
no DOI — not checkedUIS. (2022). How much does your country invest in R&D? Accessed November 22, 2022. Available from: How much does your country invest in R&D?https://uis.unesco.org
no DOI — not checkedWorld Bank. (2022). World Development Indicators. Accessed on August 20, 2022. Available from:
World Development Indicators |https://databank.worldbank.org
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s13132-023-01220-0"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s13132-023-01220-0/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s13132-023-01220-0)