Reference health
Short-Run Allocation of Emissions Allowances and Long-Term Goals for Climate Policy
3 of 27 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-09
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
15 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.3763/cpol.2006.0628
does not resolve to a known work10.3763/cpol.2006.0608
does not resolve to a known work10.3763/cpol.2006.0605
The 24 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.007
A Ten-Year Rule to guide the allocation of EU emission allowances
resolves10.1016/j.reseneeco.2006.07.001
Is there a rationale for output-based rebating of environmental levies?
resolves10.1111/1468-0297.00020
The Biggest Auction Ever: The Sale of the British 3G Telecom Licences
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9442.2005.00423.x
Economic Implications of Alternative Allocation Schemes for Emission Allowances*
resolves10.7208/chicago/9780226094809.003.0003
Neutralizing the Adverse Industry Impacts of CO2 Abatement Policies
resolves10.1093/reep/rer009
Policy Monitor—Greenhouse Gas Regulation under the Clean Air Act: A Guide for Economists
resolves10.17310/ntj.2002.2.01
Distributional Effects of Carbon Allowance Trading: How Government Decisions Determine Winners and Losers
resolves10.3368/le.83.4.575
Output-Based Allocation of Emissions Permits for Mitigating Tax and Trade Interactions
resolves10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00002-0
Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous
resolves10.1016/0095-0696(89)90019-3
Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control
resolves10.1006/jeem.1998.1058
When Can Carbon Abatement Policies Increase Welfare? The Fundamental Role of Distorted Factor Markets
resolves10.1007/s10640-010-9432-z
Emissions Trading with Updated Allocation: Effects on Entry/Exit and Distribution
resolves10.3763/cpol.2006.0604
CO<SUB>2</SUB> cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector
resolves10.1007/s10584-007-9281-0
Output and abatement effects of allocation readjustment in permit trade
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1978479
Prevailing Academic View on Compliance Flexibility Under § 111 of the Clean Air Act
resolves10.1007/s13280-011-0237-2
What Have We Learnt from the European Union’s Emissions Trading System?
The 15 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBurtraw, D., K. Palmer, and D. Kahn. 2005. Allocation of CO 2 emissions allowances in the regional greenhouse gas cap-and-trade program. Discussion paper 05–25. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
no DOI — not checkedBurtraw, D., K. Palmer, R. Bharvikar, and A. Paul. 2001. The effect of allowance allocation on the cost of carbon emission trading. RFF discussion paper 01–30. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
no DOI — not checkedEAAC. 2010. Allocating emissions allowances under a California cap-and-trade program (March), Economic and Allocation Advisory Committee, State of California Air Resources Board. http://www.climatechange.ca.gov/eaac/documents/eaac_reports/2010-03-22_EAAC_Allocation_Report_Final.pdf . Accessed 9 Jan 2012.
no DOI — not checkedEgenhofer, C., and A. Georgiev (rapporteurs). 2010. Benchmarking in the EU—Lessons from the EU emissions trading system for the global climate change agenda. Centre for European Policy Studies, Place du Congrès 1, B-1000 Brussels: ISBN:978-92-9079-959-7.
no DOI — not checkedEllerman, D., B. Buchner, and C. Carraro (eds.). 2007. Allocation in the European emissions trading scheme: Rights rents and fairness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission. 2003. Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Union and of the Council of 13 October 2009 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the community and amending council directive 96/61/EC.
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission. 2008. MEMO/08/35, Brussels, 23 January 2008. Questions and answers on the commission’s proposal to revise the EU emissions trading system.
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission. 2009. Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Union and of the council of 23 April 2009 amending directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the community.
no DOI — not checkedFischer, C. 2001. Rebating environmental policy revenues: Output based allocations and tradable performance standards. Discussion paper 01–22. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
no DOI — not checkedFischer, C., and A. K. Fox. 2010. On the scope for output-based rebating in climate policy: When revenue recycling isn’t enough (or Isn’t Possible). Discussion paper 10–69. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
no DOI — not checkedGoulder, L.H. (ed.). 2002. Environmental policy making in economies with prior tax distortions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
no DOI — not checkedHarrison, D., P. Klevnas, D. Radov, and A. Foss. 2007. Complexities of allocation choices in a greenhouse gas emissions trading program. Boston: NERA Economic Consulting.
no DOI — not checkedRichardson, N., A.T. Fraas, and D. Burtraw. 2011. Greenhouse gas regulation under the clean air act: Structure, effects and implications of a knowable pathway. Environmental Law Reporter 41: 10098–10120.
no DOI — not checkedZapfel, P. 2007. A brief but lively chapter in EU climate policy: The commission’s perspective. In Allocation in the European Emissions Trading Scheme: Rights rents and fairness, ed. D. Ellerman, B. Buchner, and C. Carraro. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, Chapter 2.
no DOI — not checkedZetterberg, L, 2011. Instruments for reaching climate objectives—focusing on the time aspects of bioenergy and allocation rules in the European Union’s Emissions Trading System. PhD thesis. University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s13280-011-0238-1"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s13280-011-0238-1/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s13280-011-0238-1)