Reference health
Partnering with cattle ranchers for forest landscape restoration
43/43 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 43 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1146/annurev.energy.29.062403.102142
GRAZING SYSTEMS, ECOSYSTEM RESPONSES, AND GLOBAL CHANGE
resolves10.1016/j.wace.2016.12.001
Comparing smallholder farmers’ perception of climate change with meteorological data: A case study from southwestern Nigeria
resolves10.1080/21683565.2013.819479
Why Do Cattle Ranchers Participate in Conservation Easement Agreements? Key Motivators in Decision Making
resolves10.1098/rspb.2013.2025
Sustainable, efficient livestock production with high biodiversity and good welfare for animals
resolves10.19182/bft2009.300.a20417
Perception paysannes de la promotion de systèmes sylvo-pastoraux à Quindio, Colombie
resolves10.1080/10549811.2013.817338
A Strategy for Scaling-Up Intensive Silvopastoral Systems in Colombia
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.029
Payments for Ecosystem Services: Rife With Problems and Potential—For Transformation Towards Sustainability
resolves10.1023/A:1026394019808
Silvopastoral research and adoption in Central America: recent findings and recommendations for future directions
resolves10.1016/j.crm.2016.11.001
Farmer’s perception of climate change and responsive strategies in three selected provinces of South Africa
resolves10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01686.x
Motivations Influencing the Adoption of Conservation Easements
resolves10.1016/j.agsy.2011.09.001
Perceptions of silvopasture systems among adopters in northeast Argentina
resolves10.1016/j.agee.2012.04.017
Payment for Ecosystem Services: The roles of positive incentives and information sharing in stimulating adoption of silvopastoral conservation practices
resolves10.1016/j.foreco.2010.10.011
The tree planting and protecting culture of cattle ranchers and small-scale agriculturalists in rural Panama: Opportunities for reforestation and land restoration
resolves10.1073/pnas.0910275107
Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s
resolves10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034017
Cropland/pastureland dynamics and the slowdown of deforestation in Latin America
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.11.012
More than money for conservation: Exploring social co-benefits from PES schemes
resolves10.1016/j.agsy.2008.10.003
Motivations, risk perceptions and adoption of conservation practices by farmers
resolves10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00863.x
Integrating Agricultural Landscapes with Biodiversity Conservation in the Mesoamerican Hotspot
resolves10.1017/S0376892912000045
Payment for ecosystem services, sustained behavioural change, and adaptive management: peasant perspectives in the Colombian Andes
resolves10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.001
Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.016
Payments for environmental services in watersheds: Insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America
resolves10.1890/140052
Creating space for large‐scale restoration in tropical agricultural landscapes
resolves10.1007/s10113-014-0699-4
The spontaneous emergence of silvo-pastoral landscapes in the Ecuadorian Amazon: patterns and processes
resolves10.1007/S10457-007-9047-8
Developing silvopastoral systems and their effects on diversity of fauna
resolves10.1016/j.foreco.2010.09.027
Native trees and shrubs for the productive rehabilitation of tropical cattle ranching lands
resolves10.1093/reep/req006
Show Me the Money: Do Payments Supply Environmental Services in Developing Countries?
resolves10.1029/2007GB002952
Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000
resolves10.2111/rem-d-10-00144.1
Centrality of the Ranching Lifestyle and Attitudes Toward a Voluntary Incentive Program to Protect Endangered Species
resolves10.1080/08941920.2014.945062
The Multidimensionality of Trust: Applications in Collaborative Natural Resource Management
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.001
When enough should be enough: Improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil
resolves10.4225/50/57c4e802072ec
What factors influence the effectiveness of financial incentives on long-term natural resource management practice change?
resolves10.1080/10549811.2013.818551
Restoring Landscapes—Governing Place: A Learning Approach to Forest Landscape Restoration
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018
An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services
resolves10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00250.x
Using Economic and Regulatory Incentives to Restore Endangered Species: Lessons Learned from Three New Programs
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAmézquita, M.C., E. Murgueitio, M.A. Ibrahim, and B. Ramírez. 2010. Carbon sequestration in pasture and silvopastoral systems compared with native forests in ecosystems of tropical America. Grassland Carbon Sequestration: Management, Policy and Economics 11: 153–161.
no DOI — not checkedClearfield, F., and B.T. Osgood. 1986. Sociological aspects of the adoption of conservation practices, vol. 2. Washington, DC: Soil Conservation Service.
no DOI — not checkedFAO. 2006. Livestock report Subdirectorate of policies and support in electronic publishing. Rome: FAO. (in Spanish).
no DOI — not checkedFedegan, 2013. Analysis of the Colombian livestock inventory. Behavior and explanatory variables. Bogotá DC: Fedegan. (in Spanish).
no DOI — not checkedIUCN, and WRI. 2014. A guide to the Restoration Opportunities Assessment Methodology (ROAM): Assessing forest landscape restoration opportunities at the national or sub-national level. Edited by WRI and IUCN. Gland, Switzerland: Working paper (road-test edition), IUCN.
no DOI — not checkedMurgueitio, E., and M. Ibrahim. 2008. Cattle ranching and the environment in Latin America. In Cattle ranching for the future: Research for development, ed. E Murgueitio, C. Cuartas, and J. Naranjo, 19–39. Cali, Colombia: CIPAV, Fundación.
no DOI — not checkedPagiola, S., and A. R. Rios. 2013. Evaluation of the impact of Payments for Environmental Services on land use change in Quindío, Colombia. PES Learning Papers. Washington DC: World Bank.
no DOI — not checkedSteinfeld, H., P. Gerber, T. Wassenaar, V. Castel, M. Rosales, and C. De Haan. 2006. Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome: FAO.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s13280-019-01224-8"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s13280-019-01224-8/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s13280-019-01224-8)