Reference health

Academic Spoken Vocabulary in TED Talks: Implications for Academic Listening

https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-019-00033-2
CiteStamped reference-health badge
26/26 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

14 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 26 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1093/ijl/6.4.253
Word Families
resolves10.1075/ijcl.19.1.01bre
Significant or random?
resolves10.2307/3587951
A New Academic Word List
resolves10.5054/tq.2011.254528
The Academic Word List 10 Years On: Research and Teaching Implications
resolves10.1002/tesq.287
Reflecting on Coxhead (2000), “A New Academic Word List”
resolves10.1111/lang.12253
The Academic Spoken Word List
resolves10.1016/j.esp.2013.08.001
The lexical profile of academic spoken English
resolves10.1075/itl.167.2.02dan
Evaluating lists of high-frequency words
resolves10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00030-0
The teaching of academic listening comprehension and the question of authenticity
resolves10.1093/applin/amt015
A New Academic Vocabulary List
resolves10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00058.x
Is There an “Academic Vocabulary”?
resolves10.1177/0033688212440637
Second Language Listening and Unfamiliar Proper Names: Comprehension Barrier?
resolves10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.001
Academic listening in the 21st century: Reviewing a decade of research
resolves10.1075/lllt.10.03nat
1. A study of the most frequent word families in the British National Corpus
resolves10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
How Large a Vocabulary is Needed For Reading and Listening?
resolves10.1075/z.208
Making and Using Word Lists for Language Learning and Testing
resolves10.1002/tesj.323
Lexical Coverage of <scp>TED</scp> Talks: Implications for Vocabulary Instruction
resolves10.4018/978-1-60960-141-6.ch011
Podcasts in Four Categories
resolves10.1186/2229-0443-3-12
Recognition vocabulary knowledge as a predictor of academic performance in an English as a foreign language setting
resolves10.1017/S0261444815000075
How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland &amp; Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007)
resolves10.1017/S0261444812000018
A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching
resolves10.1017/s0272263109990039
VOCABULARY KNOWLEDGE AND ADVANCED LISTENING COMPREHENSION IN ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE
resolves10.1007/s11145-008-9141-y
Academic vocabulary and middle school English learners: an intervention study
resolves10.1093/applin/ams074
Lexical Coverage in L1 and L2 Listening Comprehension: The Same or Different from Reading Comprehension?
resolves10.1016/j.esp.2008.08.003
Frequency analysis of the words in the Academic Word List (AWL) and non-AWL content words in applied linguistics research papers
resolves10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.010
How suitable are TED talks for academic listening?
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAnthony, L. (2014). AntWordProfiler (version 1.4.1) [computer software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Retrieved from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software . Accessed 5 Mar 2019.
no DOI — not checkedCettolo, M., Girardi, C., & Federico, M. (2012). Wit3: Web inventory of transcribed and translated talks. In M. Cettolo, M. Federico, L. Specia & A. Way (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT 2012) (pp. 261–268). Retrieved from http://hltshare.fbk.eu/EAMT2012/html/Papers/59.pdf . Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
no DOI — not checkedCobb, T. (2010). Learning about language and learners from computer programs. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 181–200.
no DOI — not checkedCoxhead, A., & Walls, R. (2012). TED talks, vocabulary, and listening for EAP. TESOL ANZ Journal, 20, 55–65.
no DOI — not checkedDe Chazal, E. (2014). Prepare English language students for academic listening. British Council. Britishcouncil.org. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org/voices-magazine/prepare-english-language-students-academic-listening . Accessed 9 Apr 2019.
no DOI — not checkedErten, I., & Razi, S. (2009). The effects of cultural familiarity on reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21, 60–77.
no DOI — not checkedFloyd, M., & Jeschull, L. (2012). Teaching with TED talks: authentic and motivational language instruction. Newsletter of the Video and Digital Medial Interest Section. Retrieved from newsmanager.commpartners.com/tesolvdmis/issues/2012-08-10 / 12.html. Accessed 19 Mar 2019.
no DOI — not checkedHu, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403–430.
no DOI — not checkedJeon, J. (2007). A study of listening comprehension of academic lectures within the construction-integration model (unpublished doctoral dissertation), The Ohio State University, IL.
no DOI — not checkedNation, I. S. P. (2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists. Retrieved from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nation . Accessed 9 Apr 2019.
no DOI — not checkedThompson, P. (2006). A corpus perspective on the lexis of lectures, with a focus on economics lectures. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines (pp. 253–270). Frankfort: Peter Lang.
no DOI — not checkedWang, Y. (2012). An exploration of vocabulary knowledge in English short talks: a corpus driven approach. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2, 33–43.
no DOI — not checkedWebb, S., & Nation, P. (2013). Computer-assisted vocabulary load analysis. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–10). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
no DOI — not checkedWest, M. (1953). A general service list of English words. London: Longman, Green and Co.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s42321-019-00033-2"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s42321-019-00033-2/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s42321-019-00033-2/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s42321-019-00033-2)