Reference health

Assessing the credibility of true and false statements

https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(95)00016-b
CiteStamped reference-health badge
7/7 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-24

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

20 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 7 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1177/001316446002000104
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01138.x
On‐the‐Job Experience and Skill at Detecting Deception<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.2307/3053533
On the Fallibility of Lie Detection
resolves10.1007/BF01884022
The effect of training in criteria-based content analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults.
resolves10.1016/0010-0285(75)90023-7
Leading questions and the eyewitness report
resolves10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19
Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.
resolves10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3
Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory
The 20 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAge differences in suggestibility: Narrowing the uncertainties
no DOI — not checkedApplications of statement validity assessment
no DOI — not checkedThe cognitive interview technique
no DOI — not checkedThe accuracies and inaccuracies of children's eyewitness reports
no DOI — not checkedSuggestibility in children's testimony: Implications for sexual abuse investigations
no DOI — not checkedWhat psychologists should know about lie detection
no DOI — not checked10.1016/0160-2527(95)00016-B_BIB9
no DOI — not checkedSuggestibility and the child witness
no DOI — not checkedTraining police officers to detect deception: Does it work?
no DOI — not checked10.1016/0160-2527(95)00016-B_BIB17
no DOI — not checkedProblems in evaluating interviews of children in sexual abuse cases
no DOI — not checkedRecent developments in statement analysis
no DOI — not checkedCriteria-based statement analysis
no DOI — not checkedEmpirical validation of criteria-based content analysis
no DOI — not checkedBeurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Aussagen
no DOI — not checkedThe development of statement reality analysis
no DOI — not checkedA simulation study of criterion based content analysis
no DOI — not checked10.1016/0160-2527(95)00016-B_BIB25
no DOI — not checkedInterviewing children in sexual abuse cases
no DOI — not checkedConcerns about the application of research findings: The issue of ecological validity
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/0160-2527(95)00016-b"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/0160-2527(95)00016-b/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/0160-2527(95)00016-b/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/0160-2527(95)00016-b)