Reference health
Models for control of intravenous anesthesia
80/80 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
28 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 80 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181de6ce9
Skin Conductance Fluctuations Correlate Poorly with Postoperative Self-report Pain Measures in School-aged Children
resolves10.1016/j.autneu.2009.01.005
Heart rate variability during total intravenous anesthesia: Effects of nociception and analgesia
resolves10.1007/978-3-319-01411-1_8
Emerging Tools for Quantifying Unconscious Analgesia: Fractional-Order Impedance Models
resolves10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.12.015
Optimized PID control of propofol and remifentanil coadministration for general anesthesia
resolves10.1109/TCST.2017.2735359
Robust MISO Control of Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia Guided by the NeuroSENSE Monitor
resolves10.4304/jcp.4.4.311-318
The Analgoscore: A Novel Score to Monitor Intraoperative Nociception and its Use for Closed-Loop Application of Remifentanil
resolves10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.10.006
Bifurcation analysis of PID-controlled neuromuscular blockade in closed-loop anesthesia
resolves10.1007/s10877-005-2222-4
Hipocrates: a Robust System for the Control of Neuromuscular Blockade
resolves10.1002/cpt1979253358
Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: Application to <i>d</i>‐tubocurarine
resolves10.1097/00000542-199101000-00010
Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Rational Opioid Selection
resolves10.1097/00000542-199805000-00006
The Influence of Method of Administration and Covariates on the Pharmacokinetics of Propofol in Adult Volunteers
resolves10.1097/00000542-199701000-00004
Influence of Age and Gender on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil
resolves10.1093/bja/aem135
Remifentanil–midazolam sedation for paediatric patients receiving mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery †
resolves10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.04.001
The role of fractional calculus in modeling biological phenomena: A review
resolves10.1109/TBME.2008.923142
Robust Predictive Control Strategy Applied for Propofol Dosing Using BIS as a Controlled Variable During Anesthesia
resolves10.1023/A:1011907920641
Modeling of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Relationships: Concepts and Perspectives
resolves10.1093/bja/aeg115
Propofol sparing effect of remifentanil using closed-loop anaesthesia † ‡LMA® is the property of Intavent Ltd.
resolves10.1097/00000542-200406000-00008
Determination of the Pharmacodynamic Interaction of Propofol and Remifentanil during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Children
resolves10.1097/00000542-200212000-00005
Non–steady State Analysis of the Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Propofol and Remifentanil
resolves10.1097/00000542-200406000-00007
A Response Surface Analysis of Propofol–Remifentanil Pharmacodynamic Interaction in Volunteers
resolves10.1007/BF01060053
Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. I. Michaelis-menten model: Routine clinical pharmacokinetic data
resolves10.1007/BF01061728
Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data
resolves10.1097/ACO.0b013e32833a1d2f
Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in anesthesia, intensive care and pain medicine
resolves10.1093/bja/aeq195
Influence of obesity on propofol pharmacokinetics: derivation of a pharmacokinetic model
resolves10.1093/bja/aep143
Pharmacokinetic models for propofol—defining and illuminating the devil in the detail
resolves10.1213/00000539-198712000-00010
Disposition of Propofol Administered as Constant Rate Intravenous Infusions in Humans
resolves10.1097/00000542-200002000-00021
Comparison of Plasma Compartment versus Two Methods for Effect Compartment–controlled Target-controlled Infusion for Propofol
resolves10.1016/j.arcontrol.2012.09.001
Origins of robust control: Early history and future speculations
resolves10.1111/pan.12183
Robust closed‐loop control of induction and maintenance of propofol anesthesia in children
resolves10.1109/TBME.2013.2259592
Quantification of the Variability in Response to Propofol Administration in Children
resolves10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.07.020
Local identifiability and sensitivity analysis of neuromuscular blockade and depth of hypnosis models
resolves10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.03.010
Data-driven modeling of pharmacological systems using endpoint information fusion
resolves10.1213/ANE.0000000000002663
Design and Evaluation of a Closed-Loop Anesthesia System With Robust Control and Safety System
resolves10.1109/TBME.2004.831541
On the Use of Multivariable Piecewise-Linear Models for Predicting Human Response to Anesthesia
resolves10.1213/ANE.0000000000000317
Performance of Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Models in the Obese
resolves10.1093/bja/aex007
Predictive performance of eleven pharmacokinetic models for propofol infusion in children for long-duration anaesthesia
resolves10.3166/ejc.11.335-352
Identification for Control: From the Early Achievements to the Revival of Experiment Design*
resolves10.1016/S0005-1098(96)80003-3
For model-based control design, closed-loop identification gives better performance
resolves10.1097/00000542-200403000-00026
Performance Evaluation of Two Published Closed-loop Control Systems Using Bispectral Index Monitoring
resolves10.1097/00000542-200107000-00007
Comparison of Closed-loop Controlled Administration of Propofol Using Bispectral Index as the Controlled Variable versus “Standard Practice” Controlled Administration
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06993.x
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics – is there anything new?
resolves10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e4f4ca
Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Propofol in Children
resolves10.1093/bja/aem408
Pharmacodynamic modelling of the bispectral index response to propofol-based anaesthesia during general surgery in children
resolves10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821a8d80
An Evaluation of Using Population Pharmacokinetic Models to Estimate Pharmacodynamic Parameters for Propofol and Bispectral Index in Children
resolves10.1016/S0959-1524(02)00062-8
Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning
resolves10.1109/TCST.2013.2260543
Design and Clinical Evaluation of Robust PID Control of Propofol Anesthesia in Children
resolves10.1109/TBME.2011.2177497
A Direct Dynamic Dose-Response Model of Propofol for Individualized Anesthesia Care
resolves10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.036
Performance of robust PID and Q-design controllers for propofol anesthesia
resolves10.1109/TBME.2008.915670
A Model-Predictive Hypnosis Control System Under Total Intravenous Anesthesia
resolves10.1016/j.bspc.2013.04.005
Individualized closed-loop control of propofol anesthesia: A preliminary study
resolves10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.034
Two-degree-of-freedom control scheme for depth of hypnosis in anesthesia ⁎ ⁎This work has been partially funded by the following projects: DPI2014-55932-C2-1-R, DPI2014-55932-C2-2-R, DPI2014-56364-C2-1-R and DPI2012-31303 financed by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and EU-ERDF funds); and the UNED through a postdoctoral scholarship.
resolves10.1109/TBME.2010.2088121
Variable Time-Delay Estimation for Anesthesia Control During Intensive Care
The 28 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-12-815975-0.00010-2_br0005
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-12-815975-0.00010-2_br0015
no DOI — not checkedClosed-loop anesthesia
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-12-815975-0.00010-2_br0155
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-12-815975-0.00010-2_br0165
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-12-815975-0.00010-2_br0175
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-12-815975-0.00010-2_br0195
no DOI — not checkedEvaluation of a propofol and remifentanil interaction model for predictive control of anesthesia induction
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-12-815975-0.00010-2_br0270
no DOI — not checkedModeling the effect of surgical stimulation on mean arterial blood pressure
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-12-815975-0.00010-2_br0330
no DOI — not checkedClosed-loop instrumental variable identification of propofol anesthesia
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-12-815975-0.00010-2_br0355
no DOI — not checkedOn-line estimation of propofol pharmacodynamic parameters
no DOI — not checkedRobustness tests of a model based predictive control strategy for depth of anesthesia regulation in a propofol to bispectral index framework
no DOI — not checkedAdaptive EPSAC predictive control of the hypnotic component in anesthesia
no DOI — not checkedRobust predictive control of drug dosing during anesthesia
no DOI — not checkedPatient variability and uncertainty quantification in anesthesia: part I–PKPD modeling and identification
no DOI — not checkedOptimizing robust PID control of propofol anesthesia for children; design and clinical evaluation
no DOI — not checkedNonlinear identification of a minimal neuromuscular blockade model in anesthesia
no DOI — not checkedOnline nonlinear identification of the effect of drugs in anaesthesia using a minimal parameterization and bis measurements
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-12-815975-0.00010-2_br0485
no DOI — not checkedPatient variability and uncertainty quantification in anesthesia: part II–PKPD uncertainty
no DOI — not checkedA synthesis method for automatic handling of inter-patient variability in closed-loop anesthesia
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-12-815975-0.00010-2_br0510
no DOI — not checkedAn Engineering Oriented Approach to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling
no DOI — not checkedA controller to overcome dead time
no DOI — not checkedShould we forget the Smith predictor?
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/b978-0-12-815975-0.00010-2"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/b978-0-12-815975-0.00010-2/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/b978-0-12-815975-0.00010-2)