Reference health

Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability

https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2
CiteStamped reference-health badge
25/25 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

32 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 25 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/1242024
Information Effects in Contingent Markets
resolves10.2307/3146073
Option Value: An Exposition and Extension
resolves10.2307/1242078
Use of Dichotomous Choice Nonmarket Methods to Value the Whooping Crane Resource
resolves10.1017/S0899367X00002191
Dichotomous-Choice, Contingent-Valuation Questions: Functional Form Is Important
resolves10.1029/WR023i005p00943
Valuing wildlife in benefit‐cost analyses: A case study involving endangered species
resolves10.2307/1241972
Welfare Measurements Using Contingent Valuation: A Comparison of Techniques
resolves10.2307/3145871
Estimating Option Prices and Existence Values for Wildlife Resources
resolves10.1080/01621459.1991.10475131
Referendum Contingent Valuation Estimates: Sensitivity to the Assignment of Offered Values
resolves10.2307/1880746
Option Value: Empirical Evidence From a Case Study of Recreation and Water Quality
resolves10.2307/1240800
Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses
resolves10.1016/0095-0696(87)90018-0
A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation
resolves10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-S
Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction
resolves10.2307/3146821
Accuracy in Valuation Is a Matter of Degree
resolves10.2307/3146363
A Non-Parametric Approach to the Estimation of Welfare Measures in Discrete Response Valuation Studies
resolves10.1016/0095-0696(90)90053-2
Comparative reliability of the dichotomous choice and open-ended contingent valuation techniques
resolves10.1016/0095-0696(74)90010-2
Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements
resolves10.1017/S0899367X00001987
Contingent Valuation of a Public Program to Control Black Flies
resolves10.1016/0095-0696(80)90018-2
An experiment on the economic value of visibility
resolves10.2307/3145783
Valuing Environmental Commodities: Some Recent Experiments
resolves10.2307/3145808
Validation of Empirical Measures of Welfare Change: A Comparison of Nonmarket Techniques
resolves10.1017/S0899367X00000696
Some Issues in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation Studies
resolves10.1016/0095-0696(92)90020-W
Arbitrary values, good causes, and premature verdicts
resolves10.2307/3146546
Measuring the Existence Value of Wildlife: What Do CVM Estimates Really Show?
resolves10.2307/2555716
Informational Regulation of Consumer Health Risks: An Empirical Evaluation of Hazard Warnings
resolves10.2307/3146089
Valuing Option, Existence, and Bequest Demands for Wilderness
The 32 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAlberini, Anna. 1991a. “Choice of Thresholds for Efficient Binary Discrete Choice Estimations.” Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, unpublished.
no DOI — not checkedAlberini, Anna. 1991b. “Informational Content of Binary Responses.” Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, unpublished.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2_bib3
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2_bib4
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2_bib13
no DOI — not checkedConservation Rules and Regulations
no DOI — not checkedCummings, Ronald G., and Glenn W. Harrison. 1992. “Identifying and Measuring Nonuse Values for Natural and Environmental Resources: A Critical Review of the State of the Art.” Report prepared for the American Petroleum Institute.
no DOI — not checkedd'Arge, Ralph C., William D. Schulze, and David S. Brookshire. 1980. “Benefit-Cost Valuation of Long-Term Future Effects: The Case of CO2.” Paper presented at the Resources for the Future/National Climate Program Office Workshop, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
no DOI — not checkedDavis, Robert K. 1964. “The Value of Big Game Hunting in a Private Forest.” In Transactions of the 29th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference. Washington, DC: Wildlife Management Institute.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2_bib18
no DOI — not checkedMeasuring Nonuse Damages Using Contingent Valuation: An Experimental Evaluation of Accuracy
no DOI — not checkedDuffield, John W., and David A. Patterson. 1992. “Field Testing Existence Values: An Instream Flow Trust Fund for Montana Rivers.” Paper presented at the American Economic Association, January, New Orleans, LA.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2_bib21
no DOI — not checkedGeneral Accounting Office. 1991. “Coast Guard: Oil Spills Continue Despite Waterfront Facility Inspection Program.” Washington, DC. June.
no DOI — not checkedHubert, James J. 1990. “A Briefing of Migratory Bird Losses in the Oil Fields.” U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM, unpublished.
no DOI — not checkedContingent Valuation Question Formats: Dichotomous Choice Versus Open-Ended Responses
no DOI — not checkedKanninen, Barbara J. 1990. “Optimal Experimental Design in Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Working Paper, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
no DOI — not checkedKelly, Sean. 1990. “More Birds Died in Southwest Oil Pits than in Valdez Spill, Agents Say.” The News and Observer, Raleigh, NC, April 8, p. 19A.
no DOI — not checkedKriström, Bengt. 1988. “Discrete and Continuous Valuation Questions: Do They Give Different Answers?” Working paper #90, Dept. of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea, Sweden.
no DOI — not checkedMitchell, Robert C., and Richard T. Carson. 1981. “An Experiment in Determining Willingness to Pay for National Water Quality Improvements.” Draft report prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington: Resources for the Future, Inc.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2_bib36
no DOI — not checkedOil Spill Intelligence Report. 1991a. “International Spill Statistics, 1989–1990.” 14(12): March 28.
no DOI — not checkedOil Spill Intelligence Report. 1991b. “Outline of Preliminary Statistics of Damages to Natural Resources.” 14(13): April 11.
no DOI — not checkedRandall, Alan, and Michael C. Farmer. 1992. “Starting Price Effects in Contingent Valuation Data Sets.” Presented at the W-133 Meetings, Benefits and Costs in Natural Resources Planning, South Lake Tahoe, California, February.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2_bib42
no DOI — not checkedRowe, Robert D., William D. Schulze, W. Douglass Shaw, David Schenk, and Lauraine G. Chestnut. 1991. “Contingent Valuation of Natural Resource Damage Due to the Nestucca Oil Spill, Final Report.” Prepared for the Department of Wildlife, State of Washington, the British Columbia Ministry of Environment, and Environment Canada. Boulder, CO: RCG/Hagler, Bailly, Inc.
no DOI — not checkedAsymmetries in the Valuation for Risk Reductions
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2_bib50
no DOI — not checkedSmith, V. Kerry, William H. Desvousges, and A. Myrick Freeman, III. 1985. “Valuing Changes in Hazardous Waste Risks: A Contingent Valuation Analysis,” Volume I. Draft Interim Report prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Benefits Branch, Economic Analysis Division under EPA Cooperative Agreement No. CR-811075.
no DOI — not checkedThe Causes of Preference Reversal
no DOI — not checked10.1016/B978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2_bib54
no DOI — not checkedAdaptive Responses to Chemical Labeling: Are Workers Bayesian Decision Makers?
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/b978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/b978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/b978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/b978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2)