Reference health
Optimization of enhanced oil recovery operations in unconventional reservoirs
30/30 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
24 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 30 checked references that resolve
resolves10.4172/2157-7463.1000109
A Review on Thermal Enhanced Heavy Oil Recovery from Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs
resolves10.1016/j.petrol.2017.09.022
Critical review of field EOR projects in shale and tight reservoirs
resolves10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.103
A review of the current progress of CO2 injection EOR and carbon storage in shale oil reservoirs
resolves10.1016/j.juogr.2013.12.001
Evaluation of the EOR potential of gas and water injection in shale oil reservoirs
resolves10.2172/1427584
Maximize Liquid Oil Production from Shale Oil and Gas Condensate Reservoirs by Cyclic Gas Injection
resolves10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.092
CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery in Bakken tight oil reservoirs
resolves10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.028
Performance evaluation of CO2 Huff-n-Puff and continuous CO2 injection in tight oil reservoirs
resolves10.1016/j.petrol.2017.01.031
Compositional modeling of fracture-to-fracture miscible gas injection in an oil-rich shale
resolves10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.09.071
Screening improved recovery methods in tight-oil formations by injecting and producing through fractures
resolves10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.11.002
Co-optimization of enhanced oil recovery and carbon sequestration
resolves10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.07.015
Economic analysis of CO2-enhanced oil recovery in Ohio: Implications for carbon capture, utilization, and storage in the Appalachian Basin region
resolves10.1016/j.jngse.2016.12.040
A comparative experimental study of gas injection in shale plugs by flooding and huff-n-puff processes
resolves10.1016/j.jngse.2015.11.031
Potential to increase condensate oil production by huff-n-puff gas injection in a shale condensate reservoir
resolves10.1002/aic.14405
Strategic planning, design, and development of the shale gas supply chain network
resolves10.1002/aic.14705
Optimal design and operations of supply chain networks for water management in shale gas production: MILFP model and algorithms for the water‐energy nexus
resolves10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.03.025
An optimization framework for the integration of water management and shale gas supply chain design
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.001
Disclosing water-energy-economics nexus in shale gas development
resolves10.1002/aic.15032
Deciphering and handling uncertainty in shale gas supply chain design and optimization: Novel modeling framework and computationally efficient solution algorithm
resolves10.1002/aic.16476
Integrated shale gas supply chain design and water management under uncertainty
resolves10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.1189
CO2 Allocation for Scheduling Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Operations with Geological Sequestration Using Discrete-time Optimization
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.093
Optimal CO2 allocation and scheduling in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations
resolves10.1080/10962247.2013.832713
An exploratory study of air emissions associated with shale gas development and production in the Barnett Shale
resolves10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6
Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates
resolves10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.01.004
Key aspects in the strategic development of synthetic natural gas (BioSNG) supply chains
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.358
Integration of environmental aspects in modelling and optimisation of water supply chains
resolves10.1016/j.ress.2008.05.006
Monte Carlo evaluation of derivative-based global sensitivity measures
The 24 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedThe World Bank. Gas flaring data; 2017. http://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/gasflaringreduction#7 [accessed June 1, 2018].
no DOI — not checkedDepartment of mineral resources (dmr). North Dakota drilling and production statistics; 2019. https://www.dmr.nd.gov/oilgas/stats/statisticsvw.asp [accessed April 22, 2019].
no DOI — not checkedNorth Dakota Industrial Commission. Historical monthly gas production and sales statistics. North Dakota; 2018.
no DOI — not checkedNorth Dakota Industrial Commission. North Dakota industrial commission order 24665. North Dakota; 2014.
no DOI — not checkedEnhanced oil recovery – the history of CO2 conventional WAG injection techniques developed from Lab in the 1950’s to 2017
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114072_b0035
no DOI — not checkedPlasma pulse technology: an uprising EOR technique
no DOI — not checkedUtilization of produced gas for improved oil recovery and reduced emissions from the Bakken formation
no DOI — not checkedCO2 flooding the elm coulee field
no DOI — not checkedAssessment of CO2 flooding potential for Bakken formation, Saskatchewan
no DOI — not checkedDombrowski RJ, Fonseca ER, Karanikas JM, Moya MJF, Lamantia BC. Fluid injection in light tight oil reservoirs. US Patent 9127544; 2015.
no DOI — not checkedAdvanced Resources International (ARI). Optimization of CO2 storage in CO2 enhanced oil recovery. London (UK); 2010.
no DOI — not checkedGas injection as an enhanced recovery technique for gas condensates. A comparison of three injection gases.
no DOI — not checkedComparison of various gases for enhanced recovery from shale oil reservoirs
no DOI — not checkedExperimental investigation of enhanced recovery in unconventional liquid reservoirs using CO2: a look ahead to the future of unconventional EOR
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114072_b0150
no DOI — not checkedGas selection for Huff-n-Puff EOR in shale oil reservoirs based upon experimental and numerical study
no DOI — not checkedInnovative unconventional EOR-a lightEOR an unconventional tertiary recovery approach to an unconventional Bakken reservoir in Southeast Saskatchewan
no DOI — not checkedMulti-period planning, design and strategic models for long-term, quality-sensitive shale gas development
no DOI — not checkedTidal petroleum. Drilling cost; 2018. https://www.tidalpetroleum.com/processes/drilling-cost [accessed June 5, 2018].
no DOI — not checkedEnergy Information Administration (EIA). Trends in U.S. oil and natural gas upstream costs; 2016.
no DOI — not checkedGeochemical characterization of natural gas: a physical multivariable approach and its applications in maturity and migration estimates
no DOI — not checkedNational Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). Unit process library; 2012. https://www.netl.doe.gov/node/2573 [accessed June 5, 2018].
no DOI — not checkedKucherenko S, Zaccheus O. SobolGSA software; 2017. http://www.imperial.ac.uk/process-systems-engineering/research/free-software/sobolgsa-software/ [accessed August 1, 2019].
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114072"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114072/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114072)