Reference health
Testing the validity of the spherical DEM model in simulating real granular screening processes
16/16 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
1 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 16 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/S0307-904X(01)00050-6
DEM modelling of industrial granular flows: 3D case studies and the effect of particle shape on hopper discharge
resolves10.1016/j.mineng.2009.07.002
Separation performance of double deck banana screens – Part 1: Flow and separation for different accelerations
resolves10.1016/j.mineng.2009.07.001
Separation performance of double deck banana screens – Part 2: Quantitative predictions
resolves10.1016/S0892-6875(02)00225-X
Evaluating the Nakajima et al. model for rectangular-aperture screens
resolves10.1016/j.ces.2009.10.028
Dynamics of gas–solid fluidised beds with non-spherical particle geometry
resolves10.1205/09603080252938744
A Numerical Simulation of Separation of Crop Seeds by Screening—Effect of Particle Bed Depth
resolves10.1016/S0032-5910(03)00092-5
Discrete particle motion on sieves—a numerical study using the DEM simulation
resolves10.1016/S0892-6875(99)00033-3
Interrelation of stratification and passage in the screening process
resolves10.1016/S0892-6875(00)00009-1
Influence of particle size and bed thickness on the screening process
resolves10.1016/0032-5910(86)80075-4
A study of the effect of operating variables on the efficiency of a vibrating screen
The 1 reference without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBehavior of non-spherical particles in screening
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.ces.2011.09.029"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.ces.2011.09.029/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.ces.2011.09.029)