Reference health
Ownership versus on-campus use of mobile IT devices by university students
35/35 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-24
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
16 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 35 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1108/10650740510617511
Redirecting under‐utilised computer laboratories into cluster computing facilities
resolves10.1080/00048623.2008.10721349
Where and Why Students Choose to Use Computer Facilities: A Collaborative Study at an Australian and United Kingdom University
resolves10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.01.011
Determinants of a Digital Divide in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Cell Phone Coverage
resolves10.1093/oep/gpl024
The determinants of the global digital divide: a cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration
resolves10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.016
The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education
resolves10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.04.003
Academic achievement, technology and race: Experimental evidence
resolves10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.027
Is a schools’ performance related to technical change? – A study on the relationship between innovations and secondary school productivity
resolves10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022
Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university?
resolves10.14742/ajet.1233
First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives?
resolves10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.012
‘Pretty Lights’ and Maths! Increasing student engagement and enhancing learning through the use of electronic voting systems
resolves10.1080/03075070500095689
Learners and learning in the twenty‐first century: what do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses?
resolves10.14742/ajet.1087
Assessing laptop use in higher education classrooms: The Laptop Effectiveness Scale (LES)
resolves10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004
Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies
resolves10.1080/09523987.2012.683959
Exploring situational factors shaping access in a laptop program for socially disadvantaged children in India: a case study
resolves10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.015
ICT in teacher education in an emerging developing country: Vietnam’s baseline situation at the start of ‘The Year of ICT’
resolves10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01310.x
The fast‐paced iPad revolution: Can educators stay up to date and relevant about these ubiquitous devices?
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00707.x
The Social Demography of Internet Dating in the United States
resolves10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.008
Little experience with ICT: Are they really the Net Generation student-teachers?
resolves10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.006
Sessional, weekly and diurnal patterns of computer lab usage by students attending a regional University in Australia
resolves10.1007/s12528-010-9041-4
A multi-year investigation of the relationship between pedagogy, computer use and course effectiveness in postsecondary education
resolves10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.029
Socioeconomic differences in elementary students’ ICT beliefs and out-of-school experiences
resolves10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.006
Ubiquitous laptop usage in higher education: Effects on student achievement, student satisfaction, and constructivist measures in honors and traditional classrooms
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.003_bib7
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.003_bib9
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.003_bib17
no DOI — not checkedComputers make kids smarter – right?
no DOI — not checkedBring Your Own Device (BYOD) with Cloud 4 education
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.003_bib27
no DOI — not checkedIT in higher education – a study
no DOI — not checkedIs your university ready for the ne(x)t-generation?
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.003_bib32
no DOI — not checkedThe role of information and communication technology (IT) in higher education for the 21st century
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.003_bib39
no DOI — not checkedDo schools make a difference?
no DOI — not checkedHome internet access and usage in the USA: trends in the socio-economic digital divide
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.003_bib46
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.003_bib48
no DOI — not checkedBridging the digital divide? Educational challenges and opportunities in Rwanda
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.003"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.003/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.003)