Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
Durability of GFRP Rebars in Concrete Beams under Sustained Loads at Severe Environments
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedFederal Highway Administration (FHWA). Standard database reports: IBRC database; 2006. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/ibrc/resourcb.cfm [Updated 22.9.06].
no DOI — not checkedGangarao HVS, Vijay PV. Aging of structural composites under varying environmental conditions. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on non-metallic (FRP) reinforcement for concrete structures (FRPRCS-3), Sapporo, Japan, October 14–16, vol. 2. 1997, p. 91–8.
no DOI — not checkedDejke V. Durability of FRP reinforcement in concrete. Thesis for the degree of Licentiate of Engineering. Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology; 2001.
no DOI — not checkedUS Army Corps of Engineers. Investigations of plastic composite materials for highway safety structures. Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL). Report 98-7; 1998. p. 41–6.
no DOI — not checkedNkurunziza G, Benmokrane B, Debaiky AS, Masmoudi R. Effect of creep and environment on long-term tensile properties of glass FRP reinforcing bars. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on advanced composite materials in bridges and structures (ACMBS), Calgary, Canada, July 20–23, 2004. p. 1–8.
no DOI — not checkedASTM D 3916. Standard test method for tensile properties of pultruded glass–fiber–reinforced plastic rods; 2002.
no DOI — not checkedASTM D 4475. Standard test method for apparent shear strength of pultruded reinforced plastic rods by the short-beam method; 2002.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.