Reference health
A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning
45/45 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
19 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 45 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00043-6
The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.014
Ecosystem properties, potentials and services – The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example
resolves10.1016/S0038-0121(02)00047-2
The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in the integrated assessment of climate change: implications for IA practitioners
resolves10.3097/LO.200915
Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services - A concept for land-cover based assessments
resolves10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.07.001
Ecosystem services – Bridging ecology, economy and social sciences
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.05.001
Integrating expert knowledge and quantitative information for mapping cropping systems
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.009
Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services
resolves10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making
resolves10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.015
Error propagation associated with benefits transfer-based mapping of ecosystem services
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.027
A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics
resolves10.5751/ES-03392-150334
Pimp Your Landscape - a Generic Approach for Integrating Regional Stakeholder Needs into Land Use Planning
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005
Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services
resolves10.1002/mcda.306
MCDM methods in strategic planning of forestry on state‐owned lands in Finland: applications and experiences
resolves10.1007/s00267-009-9384-7
Assessing Landscape Functions with Broad-Scale Environmental Data: Insights Gained from a Prototype Development for Europe
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.09.007
Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data
resolves10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.08.025
A multiple regression approach to assess the spatial distribution of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) at the regional scale (Flanders, Belgium)
resolves10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00044-0
Qualitative multi-criteria approaches to assessing indicators of sustainable forest resource management
resolves10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.023
Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms
resolves10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01347.x
Ecosystem Services as a Stakeholder‐Driven Concept for Conservation Science
resolves10.3097/LO.201023
Ecosystem Services at the Landscape Scale: the Need for Integrative Approaches
resolves10.1890/080023
Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales
resolves10.1007/s10980-009-9377-1
Changing landscapes to accommodate for climate change impacts: a call for landscape ecology
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.04.006
An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options
resolves10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.05.002
A catchment-based approach to mapping hydrological ecosystem services using riparian habitat: A case study from the Wet Tropics, Australia
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.011
A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England
resolves10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.017
Potential impacts of climate change in Germany—Identifying regional priorities for adaptation activities in spatial planning
resolves10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.005
Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.007
The future of farming: The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach
resolves10.1016/j.eiar.2007.09.004
Multi-criteria assessment of socio-environmental aspects in shrinking cities. Experiences from eastern Germany
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x
A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.003
Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies
resolves10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.032
Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.007
Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer
resolves10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.001
Multi-criteria assessment for linking regional conservation planning and farm-scale actions
The 19 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAnonymous, 2011. www.forsten.sachsen.de/umwelt, last accessed: 31.05.2011.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010_bib0015
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010_bib0025
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010_bib0035
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010_bib0065
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Parliament, 2001. Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment. Official Journal of the European Communities L 197/30, 21.7.2001.
no DOI — not checkedPimp your landscape – a cellular automaton approach to estimate the effects of land use pattern changes on environmental services
no DOI — not checkedIntegrating land management aspects in the impact assessment of land cover changes on ecosystem services
no DOI — not checkedThe links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010_bib0140
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010_bib0155
no DOI — not checkedUsing a multi-criteria approach to fit the evaluation basis of the modified 2-D cellular automaton Pimp Your Landscape
no DOI — not checkedQuantifying Ecosystem Service Trade-offs
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010_bib0175
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010_bib0190
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010_bib0240
no DOI — not checkedPérez-Soba, M., Danes, M., Jones, L., Petit, S., Bertrand, N., Briquel, V., Paracchini, M.L., Kenderessy, P., Vinther, F.P., Hasler, B., Pacini, C., Contini, C., Omodei Zorini, L., Imrichova, Z., Farrington, J.H., Rothman, D., Konkoly, E., Jombach, S., Tatai, Z., 2009. Framework and methodology for a regional sustainability assessment based on Land Use Functions. in: K. Helming, H. Wiggering, (Eds.), SENSOR Report Series 2009/06.
no DOI — not checkedThe Analytic hierarchy and analytic network process for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010_bib0310
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010)