Reference health
The optimal investment decision for an innovative supplier in a supply chain
43/43 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
9 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 43 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1090.1010
Effort, Revenue, and Cost Sharing Mechanisms for Collaborative New Product Development
resolves10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.015
Cost-sharing mechanism for product quality improvement in a supply chain under competition
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2014.1938
Dynamic Bargaining in a Supply Chain with Asymmetric Demand Information
resolves10.1111/poms.12026
The Role of Contract Negotiation and Industry Structure in Production Outsourcing
resolves10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01417.x
Supply Chain Contracting Under Competition: Bilateral Bargaining vs. Stackelberg
resolves10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00590-8
Strategic commitment to price to stimulate downstream innovation in a supply chain
resolves10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.050
Green product development under competition: A study of the fashion apparel industry
resolves10.1287/mksc.17.4.301
Process Innovation, Product Differentiation, and Channel Structure: Strategic Incentives in a Duopoly
resolves10.2307/3087440
Bargaining, Mergers, and Technology Choice in Bilaterally Oligopolistic Industries
resolves10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.004
Optimal bargaining timing of a wholesale price for a manufacturer with a retailer in a dual-channel supply chain
resolves10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.045
Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1040.0212
Sell the Plant? The Impact of Contract Manufacturing on Innovation, Capacity, and Profitability
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1070.0730
Implications of Breach Remedy and Renegotiation Design for Innovation and Capacity
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1070.0731
Implications of Renegotiation for Optimal Contract Flexibility and Investment
resolves10.2307/1599199
The Rule of Reason and the Economic Approach: Reflections on the Sylvania Decision
resolves10.1111/poms.12348
Investing in a Shared Supplier in a Competitive Market: Stochastic Capacity Case
resolves10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.028
Managing a closed-loop supply chain with process innovation for remanufacturing
resolves10.1177/0003603X8202700207
A Rule of Reason Analysis of Territorial Restrictions in the Soft Drink Industry
resolves10.1111/poms.12218
The Impact of Contracts and Competition on Upstream Innovation in a Supply Chain
resolves10.1002/smj.2159
Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: Innovation incentives and trajectory choices
resolves10.1016/j.ejor.2017.12.027
Supplier encroachment under nonlinear pricing with imperfect substitutes: Bargaining power versus revenue-sharing
resolves10.1016/j.ejor.2016.12.035
To collaborate or not to collaborate: Prompting upstream eco-efficient innovation in a supply chain
resolves10.1111/j.1937-5956.2002.tb00476.x
VERTICAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE IN A SUPPLY CHAIN WITH DUOPOLY RETAILERS
resolves10.1016/j.ejor.2018.08.002
Manufacturer encroachment with quality decision under asymmetric demand information
The 9 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAdelman, D., Aydin, A., & Parker, R. P. (2011). Driving technology innovation down a competitive supply chain. Working Paper, University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
no DOI — not checkedSupply chain coordination with contracts
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.040_sbref0006
no DOI — not checkedDruehl, C., & Raz, G. (2013). The 3Cs of outsourcing innovation: Control, capability, and cost. Working paper, Darden School of Business, University of Virginia.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.040_sbref0024
no DOI — not checkedKim, S.-H., & Swinney, R. (2013). Supply chain contracting with quality choice. Working paper, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.040_bib0028
no DOI — not checkedSupply contracting and process innovation in a dynamic supply chain with information asymmetry
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.040_bib0043
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.040"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.040/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.040)