Reference health
Comprehensive competitiveness assessment of four coal-to-liquid routes and conventional oil refining route in China
67/67 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
26 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 67 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145928
Assessment of environmental and economic aspects of household food waste using a new Environmental-Economic Footprint (EN-EC) index: A case study of Daegu, South Korea
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.352
Driving factors and predictions of CO2 emission in China's coal chemical industry
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.038
Coal-to-liquids projects in China under water and carbon constraints
resolves10.1007/s11708-020-0802-0
Approach and potential of replacing oil and natural gas with coal in China
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125800
Virtual water flow associated with interprovincial coal transfer in China: Impacts and suggestions for mitigation
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.254
The net energy impact of substituting imported oil with coal-to-liquid in China
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.007
Energy use, greenhouse gases emission and cost effectiveness of an integrated high– and low–temperature Fisher–Tropsch synthesis plant from a lifecycle viewpoint
resolves10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.09.007
Life cycle analysis of direct and indirect coal liquefaction for vehicle power in China
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.182
Water footprint assessment of coal-based fuels in China: Exploring the impact of coal-based fuels development on water resources
resolves10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.031
Life cycle comparison of greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption for coal and oil shale to liquid fuels
resolves10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.157
Life-cycle assessment of alternative liquid fuels production in China
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.006
Multi-scale sustainability assessments for biomass-based and coal-based fuels in China
resolves10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.047
Economic and environmental analyses of coal and biomass to liquid fuels
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120006
Techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquid processes with different gasifier alternatives
resolves10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.005
A techno-economic assessment of gas-to-liquid and coal-to-liquid plants through the development of scale factors
resolves10.1016/j.energy.2016.04.108
Modeling and techno-economic analysis of shale-to-liquid and coal-to-liquid fuels processes
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.288
Determination of reaction parameters in methanol to gasoline (MTG) process using infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics
resolves10.1016/j.jaap.2018.06.009
Catalytic hydrogenation of Low temperature coal tar into jet fuel by using two-reactors system
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037
Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120160
A review on energy, environment and economic assessment in remanufacturing based on life cycle assessment method
resolves10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.005
Greenhouse gas emission accounting approaches in electricity generation systems: A review
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2019.109467
Determining the size of energy storage system to maximize the economic profit for photovoltaic and wind turbine generators in South Korea
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.118
Concentration of natural aroma compounds from fruit juice hydrolates by pervaporation in laboratory and semi-technical scale. Part 2. Economic analysis
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.100
Life cycle assessment and economic analysis of methanol production from coke oven gas compared with coal and natural gas routes
resolves10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103110
High-resolution analysis of life-cycle carbon emissions from China’s coal-fired power industry: A provincial perspective
resolves10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.100
Life cycle cost of conventional, battery electric, and fuel cell electric vehicles considering traffic and environmental policies in China
resolves10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.079
Comparative life cycle energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic costs of hydrogen production from coke oven gas and coal gasification
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115574
Comparison of life-cycle energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic costs of coal to ethanol and bioethanol
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120098
Life-cycle-based water footprint assessment of coal-fired power generation in China
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.022
Intensive carbon dioxide emission of coal chemical industry in China
resolves10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.192
Life cycle cost assessment of wind power–hydrogen coupled integrated energy system
resolves10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.111
Process development of coke oven gas to methanol integrated with CO2 recycle for satisfactory techno-economic performance
resolves10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103253
Techno-economic viability studies on methane gas production from gas hydrates reservoir in the Krishna-Godavari basin, east coast of India
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.040
Life cycle assessment and environmental cost accounting of coal-fired power generation in China
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.062
Carbon emission coefficient measurement of the coal-to-power energy chain in China
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.024
Emission factors of fugitive methane from underground coal mines in China: Estimation and uncertainty
resolves10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105237
Improving the estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from the Chinese coal-to-electricity chain by a bottom-up approach
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.101
Life cycle assessment of typical methanol production routes: The environmental impacts analysis and power optimization
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119183
A holistic life cycle evaluation of coking production covering coke oven gas purification process based on the subdivision method
resolves10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.076
Life cycle water demand coefficients for crude oil production from five North American locations
resolves10.1021/es102498a
Uncertainty Analysis of Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Petroleum-Based Fuels and Impacts on Low Carbon Fuel Policies
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.010
Life-cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions for electricity generation and supply in China
resolves10.1016/j.enconman.2014.11.007
Life cycle assessment of energy consumption and GHG emissions of olefins production from alternative resources in China
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.080
The energy and water nexus in Chinese electricity production: A hybrid life cycle analysis
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118518
Reduction of carbon emissions from China's coal-fired power industry: Insights from the province-level data
resolves10.1016/j.joei.2017.06.007
Experimental study on the coal tar hydrocracking process over different catalysts
resolves10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.161
A novel path for carbon-rich resource utilization with lower emission and higher efficiency: An integrated process of coal gasification and coking to methanol production
resolves10.1016/j.cej.2019.123229
An improved tar–water separation process of low–rank coal conversion wastewater for increasing the tar yield and reducing the oil content in wastewater
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114976
Study on coal water slurries prepared from coal chemical wastewater and their industrial application
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111107
Life cycle economic assessment of coal chemical wastewater treatment facing the ‘Zero liquid discharge’ industrial water policies in China: Discharge or reuse?
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.285
Exploring the nexus between water saving and energy conservation: Insights from industry sector during the 12th Five-Year Plan period in China
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.063
A supply chain based assessment of water issues in the coal industry in China
resolves10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.019
Thermodynamic analysis of a solar thermochemical cycle-based direct coal liquefaction system for oil production
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113684
Investigation and optimization analysis on deployment of China coal chemical industry under carbon emission constraints
resolves10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.03.004
CCUS in China’s mitigation strategy: insights from integrated assessment modeling
resolves10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111814
Comparative techno-economic analysis of oil-based and coal-based ethylene glycol processes
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2019.01.009
Forecasting the development of China's coal-to-liquid industry under security, economic and environmental constraints
resolves10.1016/j.cjche.2021.04.004
Reviews of clean coal conversion technology in China: Situations & challenges
resolves10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.070
Coke oven gas: Availability, properties, purification, and utilization in China
resolves10.1016/j.eneco.2014.05.014
Hedging crude oil using refined product: A regime switching asymmetric DCC approach
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.010
China's coal price disturbances: Observations, explanations, and implications for global energy economies
The 26 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib1
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib3
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib4
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib5
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib6
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib7
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib8
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib12
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib13
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib34
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib35
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib41
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib42
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib43
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib50
no DOI — not checkedComprehensive evaluation on sustainable development of China's advanced coal to chemicals industry based on EWM-AHP
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib53
no DOI — not checkedEvaluation index system of clean production in coal mining and processing industry
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib59
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib60
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib64
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib68
no DOI — not checkedLife cycle assessment and water footprint evaluation of crude steel production: a case study in China
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib89
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442_bib90
no DOI — not checkedSpatial distribution of provincial carbon emissions
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121442)