Reference health
Effects of the sustainable forestry initiative fiber sourcing standard on the average implementation rate of forestry best management practices in Georgia, United States
20/20 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
15 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 20 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012828.33069.f6
Forestry best management practices for timber harvesting and site preparation in the eastern United States: An overview of water quality and productivity research during the past 20 years (1982–2002)
resolves10.1111/1468-0491.00199
Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non–State Market–Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule–Making Authority
resolves10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.025
Effectiveness of forestry best management practices in the United States: Literature review
resolves10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012822.20500.ae
Costs of forestry best management practices in the south: A review
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.003
The effectiveness of market-based conservation in the tropics: Forest certification in Ecuador and Bolivia
resolves10.1162/152638004323074200
Overlapping Public and Private Governance: Can Forest Certification Fill the Gaps in the Global Forest Regime?
resolves10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012820.88013.88
Perceived values of benefits from Mississippi's forestry Best Management Practices
resolves10.1002/eet.1591
Challenges to the Legitimacy of Private Forest Governance – the Development of Forest Certification in Sweden
resolves10.1016/j.forpol.2010.11.004
Can voluntary standards regulate forestry? — Assessing the environmental impacts of forest certification in Sweden
resolves10.1080/02827581.2010.545827
Best management practices and timber harvesting: the role of social networks in shaping landowner decisions
resolves10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01088.x
Forest certification as a global environmental governance tool: What is the macro-effectiveness of the Forest Stewardship Council?
resolves10.1093/njaf/23.2.133
Voluntary Best Management Practice Implementation by Nonindustrial Private Forestland Owners in New York City’s Water Supply System
resolves10.1016/j.forpol.2005.03.014
Forest certification and institutional governance: An empirical study of forest stewardship council certificate holders in the United States
resolves10.1007/s10784-005-0951-y
What Role for Private Rule-Making in Global Environmental Governance? Analysing the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)
resolves10.1093/njaf/24.4.265
Timber Harvesting Characteristics on Forest Stewardship Properties and Non–Forest Stewardship Properties in Central West Virginia
resolves10.3390/f8110445
Private Forest Governance, Public Policy Impacts: The Forest Stewardship Council in Russia and Brazil
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.045
Understanding perceptions of stakeholder groups about Forestry Best Management Practices in Georgia
The 15 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedTransnational governance as the layering of rules: Intersections of public and private standards
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.016_bb0035
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.016_bb0040
no DOI — not checkedForest Certification as a policy option in conserving biodiversity: An empirical study of forest management in Tanzania. For
no DOI — not checkedWorking woods: a case study of sustainable forest management on vermont family forests
no DOI — not checkedLandowner satisfaction with timber harvesting on west virginia forest stewardship program properties
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.016_bb0100
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.016_bb0105
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.016_bb0120
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.016_bb0135
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.016_bb0140
no DOI — not checkedForestry BMP implementation costs for Virginia
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.016_bb0150
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.016_bb0165
no DOI — not checkedDo Forest Management Plans Increase Best Management Practices Implementation on Family Forests? A Formative Evaluation in the New York City Watershed
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.016"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.016/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.016)