Reference health
A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: Methodological aspects and empirical evidence
59/59 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
36 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 59 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.01.003
Technology induced error and usability: The relationship between usability problems and prescription errors when using a handheld application
resolves10.1542/peds.2005-1287
Unexpected Increased Mortality After Implementation of a Commercially Sold Computerized Physician Order Entry System
resolves10.1197/jamia.M1471
Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors
resolves10.1197/jamia.M2042
Types of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry
resolves10.1016/j.jbi.2005.05.002
To err is not entirely human: Complex technology and user cognition
resolves10.1197/jamia.M1740
Comprehensive Analysis of a Medication Dosing Error Related to CPOE: Table 1
resolves10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.003
The significance of a usability evaluation of an emerging laboratory order entry system
resolves10.1001/jama.293.10.1197
Role of Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems in Facilitating Medication Errors
resolves10.1207/s15327051hci1303_2
Damaged Merchandise? A Review of Experiments That Compare Usability Evaluation Methods
resolves10.1207/S15327590IJHC1503_01
On the Advantages of a Systematic Inspection for Evaluating Hypermedia Usability
resolves10.1207/S15327590IJHC143&4_10
Extending the Usability of Heuristics for Design and Evaluation: Lead, Follow, and Get Out of the Way
resolves10.1207/S15327590IJHC143&4_11
Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies
resolves10.1016/0020-7373(92)90039-N
Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces
resolves10.1207/S15327590IJHC1103_1
Cognitive Walkthroughs: Understanding the Effect of Task-Description Detail on Evaluator Performance
resolves10.1016/j.ergon.2004.10.004
Exploring user background settings in cognitive walkthrough evaluation of medical prototype interfaces: a case study
resolves10.1037/0022-006X.65.6.950
Think-aloud approaches to cognitive assessment and the articulated thoughts in simulated situations paradigm.
resolves10.1145/142750.142873
Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation
resolves10.1080/0044929031000
Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue
resolves10.1089/107830299312140
Heuristic Evaluation of a Web-based Interface for Internet Telemedicine
resolves10.1089/tmj.2006.12.24
Applying Heuristic Evaluation to Improve the Usability of a Telemedicine System
resolves10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.08.002
Heuristic evaluation of infusion pumps: implications for patient safety in Intensive Care Units
resolves10.1016/j.jbi.2005.10.004
Heuristic evaluation of paper-based Web pages: A simplified inspection usability methodology
resolves10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00060-1
Using usability heuristics to evaluate patient safety of medical devices
resolves10.2196/jmir.7.3.e25
The Role of User Input in Shaping Online Information From the National Cancer Institute
resolves10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00062-5
A framework for analyzing the cognitive complexity of computer-assisted clinical ordering
resolves10.1089/dia.2007.0252
Usability Test of an Internet-Based Informatics Tool for Diabetes Care Providers: The Comprehensive Diabetes Management Program
resolves10.1080/17538150802127223
Usability of a mobile electronic medical record prototype: a verbal protocol analysis
resolves10.1097/01.NCN.0000304838.52207.90
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction With Tailored Online Patient Education Information
resolves10.1109/TPC.2004.828205
Thinking About Thinking Aloud: A Comparison of TwoVerbal Protocols for Usability Testing
resolves10.1016/S1386-5056(03)00059-5
Can evaluation studies benefit from triangulation? A case study
resolves10.1055/s-0038-1633862
Future Directions in Evaluation Research: People, Organizational, and Social Issues
resolves10.12927/hcq.2013.18463
Human Factors in Action: Getting "Pumped" at a Nursing Usability Laboratory
resolves10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.002
Getting to the point: developing IT for the sharp end of healthcare
resolves10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.004
Artifacts and collaborative work in healthcare: methodological, theoretical, and technological implications of the tangible
resolves10.1016/S1386-5056(00)00133-7
‘Televaluation’ of clinical information systems: an integrative approach to assessing Web-based systems
resolves10.3758/BF03195513
Tools for remote usability evaluation of Web applications through browser logs and task models
resolves10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00056-X
Usability in the real world: assessing medical information technologies in patients’ homes
The 36 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002_bib12
no DOI — not checkedHeuristic evaluation
no DOI — not checkedHeuristic evaluation of user interfaces
no DOI — not checkedGuerilla HCI: Using discount usability engineering to penetrate intimidation barrier
no DOI — not checkedFinding usability problems through heuristic evaluation
no DOI — not checkedGuidelines for designing usable World Wide Web pages
no DOI — not checkedUsability heuristic guidelines for 3D multi-user worlds
no DOI — not checkedThe evaluator effect in usability tests
no DOI — not checkedA mathematical model of the finding of usability problems
no DOI — not checkedEnhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics
no DOI — not checkedUser interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques
no DOI — not checkedUsability testing vs. heuristic evaluation: a head-to-head comparison
no DOI — not checkedA framework for usability problem extraction
no DOI — not checkedThe cognitive walkthrough method: a practitioner's guide
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002_bib38
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002_bib41
no DOI — not checkedTelling more than we know: verbal reports on mental processes
no DOI — not checkedTesting a walk through methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces
no DOI — not checkedConcurrent versus retrospective verbal protocol for comparing window usability
no DOI — not checkedHeuristic evaluation of eNote: an electronic notes system
no DOI — not checkedI. Scandurra, M. Hägglund, M. Engström, S. Koch. Heuristic evaluation performed by usability-educated clinicians: education and attitudes, in: J. Westbrook et al. (Eds.). Information Technology in Health Care, IOS Press, 2007, pp. 205–216.
no DOI — not checkedDevelopment and iterative refinement of an internet-based service for Chinese family caregivers of people with Alzheimer disease
no DOI — not checkedUsability assessment study of a web site displaying medical resources on line: the CISMeF
no DOI — not checkedActiveOptions: leveraging existing knowledge and usability testing to develop a physical activity program website for older adults
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002_bib62
no DOI — not checkedIterative refinement of a tailored system for self-care management of depressive symptoms in people with HIV/AIDS through heuristic evaluation and end user testing
no DOI — not checkedUsability comparison of three clinical trial management systems
no DOI — not checkedCognitive evaluation of an innovative psychiatric clinical knowledge enhancement system
no DOI — not checkedUser-centred multidimensional assessment method of Clinical Information Systems: a case-study in anaesthesiology
no DOI — not checkedTask analysis of writing hospital admission orders: evidence of a problem-based approach
no DOI — not checkedTechnology induced error and usability: the relationship between usability problems and prescription errors of a handheld application
no DOI — not checkedISO/FDIS 13407:1999, Human-centred design processes for interactive systems.
no DOI — not checkedA mobile tool for accessibility and usability testing of medical instrumentation
no DOI — not checkedMORAE, www.techsmith.com/morae.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002_bib88
no DOI — not checkedThe virtual usability laboratory: its application in the evaluation and analysis of use of web-based health information resources and simulations
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002)