Reference health
The impact of progress indicators on task completion
14/14 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-11
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 14 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1087
The processing of temporal and nontemporal information in the remembering of event durations and musical structure.
resolves10.1002/acp.2350050305
Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00242.x
Velocity Toward Goal Attainment in Immediate Experience as a Determinant of Affect
resolves10.1080/10447319509526125
Displaying a boundary in graphic and symbolic “wait” displays: Duration estimates and users’ preferences
resolves10.1080/00140139608964433
Duration estimates and users' preferences in human-computer interaction
resolves10.1145/1165385.317459
The importance of percent-done progress indicators for computer-human interfaces
resolves10.1080/10447318.2002.9669128
Effect of Auditory Waiting Cues on Time Estimation in Speech Recognition Telephony Applications
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedUse and non-use of clarification features in web surveys
no DOI — not checkedCzerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., Cutrell, E., 2001. Subjective duration assessment: an implicit probe for software usability. In: Proceedings of IHM-HCI 2001 Conference, September, 2001, Lille, France, vol. 2, pp. 167–170.
no DOI — not checkedSoft constraints in interactive behavior: the case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head
no DOI — not checkedAn experimental study on the effects of personalization, survey length statements, progress indicators, and survey sponsor logos in web surveys
no DOI — not checkedKaczmirek, L., Neubarth, W., Bosnjak, M., Bandilla, W., 2004. Progress indicators in filter-based surveys: computing methods and their impact on drop out. Paper presented at the RC33 6th International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Amsterdam, August.
no DOI — not checkedCognitive manipulation of boredom
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.intcom.2010.03.001_bib21
no DOI — not checkedYan, T., Conrad, F., Tourangeau, R., Couper, M., 2007. Should I stay or should I go: The effects of progress indicators, promised duration, and questionnaire length on completing web surveys. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association of Public Opinion Research, Anaheim, CA.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-11 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.03.001"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.03.001/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.03.001)