Reference health
The role of social values in the management of ecological systems
55/55 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
17 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 55 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00218.x
The Value of Biodiversity in Reserve Selection: Representation, Species Weighting, and Benefit Functions
resolves10.3197/096327104323312734
Shifting Forest Value Orientations in the United States, 1980–2001: A Computer Content Analysis
resolves10.1080/089419202317174011
Beyond the Square Wheel: Toward a More Comprehensive Understanding of Biodiversity Conservation as Social and Political Process
resolves10.1007/s12061-011-9072-x
Values Compatibility Analysis: Using Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) for Decision Support in National Forest Management
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values
resolves10.1177/0013916506297831
Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior
resolves10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0891:AFFUSS]2.0.CO;2
A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL SCIENCE CONTRIBUTIONS TO ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT
resolves10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00088-5
Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services
resolves10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.006
A value basis for the social acceptability of clearfelling in Tasmania, Australia
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.02.003
Values and attitudes of the urban public towards peri-urban agricultural land
resolves10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00243-2
Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences
resolves10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00914.x
Knowing But Not Doing: Selecting Priority Conservation Areas and the Research–Implementation Gap
resolves10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00789.x
Engage the hodgepodge: management factors are essential when prioritizing areas for restoration and conservation action
resolves10.3197/096327199129341888
Humans Valuing Nature: Synthesising Insights from Philosophy, Psychology and Economics
resolves10.1080/14486563.2005.10648659
Integration of Natural Area Values: Conceptual Foundations and Methodological Approaches
resolves10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.004
Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature
resolves10.3197/096327111X12997574391760
What Lies Beneath the Surface? A Case Study of Citizens’ Moral Reasoning with Regard to Biodiversity
resolves10.1080/09640560600945331
A Method for assessing protected area allocations using a typology of landscape values
resolves10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.08.006
The influence of place attachment, and moral and normative concerns on the conservation of native vegetation: A test of two behavioural models
resolves10.1111/cobi.12189
Continental‐Scale Governance and the Hastening of Loss of Australia's Biodiversity
resolves10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015004970.x
Beyond Biology: toward a More Public Ecology for Conservation
resolves10.1006/jevp.2001.0227
THE STRUCTURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: CONCERN FOR SELF, OTHER PEOPLE, AND THE BIOSPHERE
resolves10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries
resolves10.1080/14486563.2010.9725261
Understanding the role of assigned values in natural resource management
resolves10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003
Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory
resolves10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda
resolves10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.003
The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes
resolves10.1111/0022-4537.00175
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02636.x
Values, Beliefs, and Proenvironmental Action: Attitude Formation Toward Emergent Attitude Objects<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80168-9
Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment
resolves10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.003
Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas
resolves10.1111/cobi.12257
Integrating Biological and Social Values When Prioritizing Places for Biodiversity Conservation
resolves10.2167/jost686.0
The Intrinsic, Instrumental and Spiritual Values of Natural Area Visitors and the General Public: A Comparative Study
resolves10.1080/08941929709381008
Trends in national forest values among forestry professionals, environmentalists, and the news media, 1982–1993
The 17 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedConservation planning and priorities
no DOI — not checkedPublic Participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: reflections on a decade of empirical research
no DOI — not checkedThe new environmental paradigm
no DOI — not checkedBeauty, belief, and trust: toward a model of psychological processes in public acceptance of forest management
no DOI — not checkedValue-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013_bib27
no DOI — not checkedTheory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm theory explaining willingness to pay for a suburban park
no DOI — not checkedA place-based, values-centered approach to managing recreation on Canadian crown lands
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013_bib39
no DOI — not checkedWho's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013_bib45
no DOI — not checkedA forest ethic and multivalue forest management
no DOI — not checkedSocial research and biodiversity conservation
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013_bib52
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013_bib56
no DOI — not checkedSalient value similarity, social trust and attitudes toward wildland fire management strategies
no DOI — not checkedThe natural area value scale
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013)