Reference health
Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results
26/26 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
12 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 26 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1037/a0027923
Publication bias in “Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men,” by Elliot et al. (2010).
resolves10.1037/a0025172
Fearing the Future of Empirical Psychology: Bem's (2011) Evidence of Psi as a Case Study of Deficiencies in Modal Research Practice
resolves10.1177/01461672012711006
Cumulative Meta-Analysis: A Consideration of Indicators of Sufficiency and Stability
resolves10.1177/1745691612462588
An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1915
Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses.
resolves10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01004.x
THE FILE-DRAWER PROBLEM REVISITED: A GENERAL WEIGHTED METHOD FOR CALCULATING FAIL-SAFE NUMBERS IN META-ANALYSIS
resolves10.1037/a0015108
Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences
resolves10.1037/a0029487
The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.
The 12 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.009_bb0005
no DOI — not checkedResearch design and issues of validity
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.009_bb0025
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.009_bb0055
no DOI — not checkedSelection models and the file drawer problem
no DOI — not checkedFactorial invariance: Historical perspectives and new problems
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.009_bb0100
no DOI — not checkedReplication in behavioral research
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.009_bb0120
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.009_bb9100
no DOI — not checkedAdvanced psychometrics: Confirmatory factor analysis, item response theory, and the study of measurement invariance
no DOI — not checkedExploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.009"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.009/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.009)