Reference health

Development and testing of three hybrid methods for the assessment of aquifer vulnerability to nitrates, based on the drastic model, an example from NE Korinthia, Greece

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014
CiteStamped reference-health badge
2 of 30 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-22

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

33 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2280779
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2285889
The 28 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1023/A:1021193827501
Conditional Independence Test for Weights-of-Evidence Modeling
resolves10.1007/s002679910026
An Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment of the Paluxy Aquifer, Central Texas, USA, Using GIS and a Modified DRASTIC Approach
resolves10.1016/0016-7037(81)90043-0
Laboratory simulation studies of uranium mobility in natural waters
resolves10.1111/j.1752-1688.1991.tb03128.x
ASSESSING GROUND WATER POLLUTION POTENTIAL FROM NITROGEN FERTILIZER USING A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb00975.x
Framework for Ground Water Protection ‐ the Managua Ground Water System as an Example
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00607.x
Correlation Between DRASTIC Vulnerabilities and Incidents of VOC Contamination of Municipal Wells in Nebraska
resolves10.1007/s100400050195
Assessment of the potential for groundwater contamination using the DRASTIC/EGIS technique, Cheongju area, South Korea
resolves10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00037-X
Multiple regression analysis of pesticide occurrence in streamflow related to pesticide properties and quantities applied
resolves10.1002/j.1551-8833.1964.tb01292.x
System for Evaluation of Contamination Potential of Some Waste Disposal Sites
resolves10.1214/aoms/1177730491
On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other
resolves10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00111-7
Predicting groundwater nitrate concentrations in a region of mixed agricultural land use: a comparison of three approaches
resolves10.1006/jema.1998.0219
A proposed index for aquifer water-quality assessment: the case of Israel's Sharon region
resolves10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600050005x
Logistic Model of Nitrate in Streams of the Upper‐Midwestern United States
resolves10.1021/es0113854
Probability of Nitrate Contamination of Recently Recharged Groundwaters in the Conterminous United States
resolves10.1007/s10040-005-0008-x
Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS
resolves10.1007/s002540050193
Groundwater quality in the Niva River basin, Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh, India
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00642.x
A Study of the DRASTIC Methodology with Emphasis on Swedish Conditions
resolves10.1080/10106049109354307
Statewide groundwater‐vulnerability assessment in nebraska using the drastic/GIS model
resolves10.3133/fs06699
Improvements to the DRASTIC ground-water vulnerability mapping method
resolves10.1006/jema.1998.0221
Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Israel's Sharon region
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6592.2000.tb00257.x
A County‐Level Assessment of Ground Water Contamination by Pesticides
resolves10.1002/hyp.1245
Marine and human activity influences on the groundwater quality of southern Korinthos area (Greece)
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6584.1997.tb00175.x
Predicting the Probability of Elevated Nitrate Concentrations in the Puget Sound Basin: Implications for Aquifer Susceptibility and Vulnerability
resolves10.1023/A:1010195410646
Multivariate Statistical Analysis in the Assessment of Hydrochemistry of the Northern Korinthia Prefecture Alluvial Aquifer System (Peloponnese, Greece)
resolves10.1214/aoms/1177731118
Sequential Tests of Statistical Hypotheses
resolves10.2307/3001968
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
resolves10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00225-8
Assessment of the bioavailability of rare earth elements in soils by chemical fractionation and multiple regression analysis
resolves10.1007/s00254-002-0645-5
Evaluation of aquifer vulnerability to contamination potential using the DRASTIC method
The 33 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAkaike, H., 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov, B.N., Csaki, F. (Eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest.
no DOI — not checkedAlberti, L., Amicis, M., De Masetti, M., Sterlacchini, S., 2001. Bayes’ Rule and GIS for evaluating sensitivity of groundwater to contamination. In: Proceedings of the IAMG Annual Conference, Cancun, Mexico.
no DOI — not checkedAller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J.H., Petty, RJ., Hackett, G., 1987. DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Ground Water Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings. EPA-600/2-87-035.
no DOI — not checkedAsadi, H.H., Hale, M., 1999. A predictive GIS model for potential mapping of gold and base metal mineralization in Takab area. In: Proccedings of GeoComputation 99, Iran. Available from: <http://www.geovista.psu.edu/geocomp/geocomp99/>.
no DOI — not checkedBaker, A.E., Cichon, J.R., Arthur, J.D., and Raines, G.L., 2002. Florida vulnerability assessment [abs.] in Abstracts with Programs – Geological Society of America 2002 Annual Meeting, Denver. CO, Oct. 27–30, 2002: Denver, CO, 34 (6), 346–347.
no DOI — not checkedIntegration of geological datasets for gold exploration in Nova Scotia
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014_bib8
no DOI — not checkedBossard, M., Feranec, J., Otahel, J., 2000. The revised and supplemented Corine Land Cover nomenclature. European Environmental Agency Technical Report 38.
no DOI — not checkedDaskalaki, P., Voudouris, K., Diamantopoulou, P., 1998. Hydrochemical study of North Peloponnesus quaternary and pliopleistocene aquifers. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Protection and Restoration of the Environment IV, Sami, Greece.
no DOI — not checkedScreening methods for ground water pollution potential from pesticide use in Colorado agriculture: Colorado Water Resources Research Institute, Fort Collins
no DOI — not checkedA CIS-based approach to evaluating regional groundwater pollution potential with DRASTIC
no DOI — not checkedFoster, S.S.D., 1987. Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: Duijvenbooden, W., Waegeningh, H.G. (Eds.), Vulnerability of Soil and Groundwater to Pollutants. TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague, Proceedings and Information 38, pp. 69–86.
no DOI — not checkedGarrett, P., Williams, J.S., Rossoll, C.F., Tolman, A.L., 1989. Are ground water vulnerability classification systems workable?. In: National Ground Water Association Columbus Proceedings of the FOCUS Conference on Eastern Regional Ground-Water Issues, Kitchener, Ont., Canada, pp. 329–343.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014_bib17
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014_bib19
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014_bib22
no DOI — not checkedKemp, L.D., Bonham-Carter, G.F., Raines, G.L., Looney, C.G., 2001. Arc-SDM: Arcview extension for spatial data modelling using weights of evidence, logistic regression, fuzzy logic and neural network analysis. Available from: <http://ntserv.gis.nrcan.gc.ca/sdm/>.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014_bib24
no DOI — not checkedKoumantakis, J., Panagopoulos, A., Stavropoulos, X., Voudouris, K., 1999. Hydrogeological Feasibility Study of Artificial Recharge Application on the Alluvial Aquifer System of the Northern Korinthos Prefecture. Southern Greece (in Greek). National Technical Univ. Athens, Athens, p. 291.
no DOI — not checkedLobo-Ferreira, J.P., Oliveira, M.M., 1997. DRASTIC ground water vulnerability mapping of Portugal. In: Proceedings from the 27th Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research, San Francisco, USA, Aug. 10-15, 132-137, Available from: <http://www-dh.lnec.pt/gias/novidades/drastic_e.html>.
no DOI — not checkedA DRASTIC approach to ground water vulnerability in South Africa
no DOI — not checkedMargat, J., 1968. Vulnerabilite des nappes d’eau souterraine a la pollution (Ground water vulnerability to contamination). Bases de la cartographic, (Doc.) BRGM, 68 SGL 198 HYD, Orleans, France (in French).
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014_bib34
no DOI — not checkedGIS-based groundwater pollution hazard assessment: a critical review of the DRASTIC model
no DOI — not checkedMorfis, A., Zojer, H., 1986. Karst hydrogeology of the Central and Eastern Peloponnesus (Greece). In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Underground Water Tracing, Athens. Steir. Beitr. Hydrogeologie, B.37/38: 301 S., Graz.
no DOI — not checkedRupert, M.G., 1998. Probability of detecting atrazine/desethyl-atrazine and elevated concentrations of nitrate in ground water of the Idaho part of the upper Snake River Basin. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-203.
no DOI — not checkedSawatzky, D.L., Raines, G.L., Bonham-Carter, G.F., Looney, C.G., 2004. ARCSDM3: ArcMAP extension for spatial data modelling using weights of evidence, logistic regression, fuzzy logic and neural network analysis. Available from: <http://ntserv.gis.nrcan.gc.ca/sdm/ARCSDM3/>.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014_bib53
no DOI — not checkedUS Environmental Protection Agency, 1993. A Review of Methods for Assessing Aquifer Sensitivity and Ground Water Vulnerability to Pesticide Contamination. US EPA/813/R-93/002.
no DOI — not checkedUS Environmental Protection Agency, 1996. Environmental Indicators of Water Quality in the United States: Washington, DC, Office of Water, EPA 841-R-96-002.
no DOI — not checkedGuidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014_bib59
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014_bib63
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014)