Reference health
Modeling effects of changing land use/cover on daily streamflow: An Artificial Neural Network and curve number based hybrid approach
52/52 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
14 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 52 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2000)126:3(156)
Comparison of ANNs and Empirical Approaches for Predicting Watershed Runoff
resolves10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03599.x
AUTOMATED METHODS FOR ESTIMATING BASEFLOW AND GROUND WATER RECHARGE FROM STREAMFLOW RECORDS<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1080/01944369608975688
Impervious Surface Coverage: The Emergence of a Key Environmental Indicator
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:2(115)
Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. I: Preliminary Concepts
resolves10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01046.x
A NEW FLASHINESS INDEX: CHARACTERISTICS AND APPLICATIONS TO MIDWESTERN RIVERS AND STREAMS<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.037
Advances in ungauged streamflow prediction using artificial neural networks
resolves10.1016/S1464-1909(99)00002-7
Impacts of landscape management on the hydrological behaviour of small agricultural catchments
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.021
Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1—background and methodology
resolves10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.10.003
Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modeling (LUCHEM). I: Model intercomparison with current land use
resolves10.1002/hyp.326
Effects of climate and land‐use change on storm runoff generation: present knowledge and modelling capabilities
resolves10.1007/s11269-010-9652-6
Spatial Information-Based Back-Propagation Neural Network Modeling for Outflow Estimation of Ungauged Catchment
resolves10.1623/hysj.52.3.491
Baseflow separation techniques for modular artificial neural network modelling in flow forecasting
resolves10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00267-1
Effects of large-scale changes in land cover on the discharge of the Tocantins River, Southeastern Amazonia
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.012
A dynamic model for predicting hydrologic response to land cover changes in gauged and ungauged catchments
resolves10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00344-0
Identification of land use with water quality data in stormwater using a neural network
resolves10.13031/2013.20488
CUMULATIVE UNCERTAINTY IN MEASURED STREAMFLOW AND WATER QUALITY DATA FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS
resolves10.1007/s00267-008-9202-7
An Auxiliary Method to Reduce Potential Adverse Impacts of Projected Land Developments: Subwatershed Prioritization
resolves10.2134/jeq2009.0441
Predicting Water Quality in Unmonitored Watersheds Using Artificial Neural Networks
resolves10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.007
Impacts of land use change scenarios on hydrology and land use patterns in the Wu-Tu watershed in Northern Taiwan
resolves10.1007/s11252-005-1416-3
Interdisciplinary research at the Urban–Rural interface: The West ga project
resolves10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03759.x
A COMPARISON OF SIX POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION METHODS FOR REGIONAL USE IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
resolves10.1016/S1364-8152(99)00007-9
Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications
resolves10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00465.x
Analyses of Urban Drainage Network Structure and its Impact on Hydrologic Response<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.2134/jeq2010.0365
Water Resources and Land Use and Cover in a Humid Region: The Southeastern United States
resolves10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles
resolves10.1029/WR026i007p01465
Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses
resolves10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00015-1
Using neural networks and GIS to forecast land use changes: a Land Transformation Model
resolves10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00171-5
An investigation of model selection criteria for neural network time series forecasting
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.08.011
Modeling of the daily rainfall-runoff relationship with artificial neural network
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.031
Land cover impacts on stream nutrients and fecal coliform in the lower Piedmont of West Georgia
resolves10.2134/jeq2006.0113
Impacts of Land Cover on Stream Hydrology in the West Georgia Piedmont, USA
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.017
Channel morphology and sediment origin in streams draining the Georgia Piedmont
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.030
The impact of land use change on catchment hydrology in large catchments: The Comet River, Central Queensland, Australia
resolves10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0267:TRHOEF>2.0.CO;2
The Regional Hydrology of Extreme Floods in an Urbanizing Drainage Basin
resolves10.1109/23.589532
Importance of input data normalization for the application of neural networks to complex industrial problems
resolves10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04475.x
COMPARISON OF PROCESS‐BASED AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK APPROACHES FOR STREAMFLOW MODELING IN AN AGRICULTURAL WATERSHED<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1029/2009WR007937
Introduction to special section on Impacts of Land Use Change on Water Resources
resolves10.5194/hessd-8-4121-2011
Top-down analysis of collated streamflow data from heterogeneous catchments leads to underestimation of land cover influence
resolves10.13031/2013.25948
Improving Daily Water Yield Estimates in the Little River Watershed: SWAT Adjustments
resolves10.1061/40685(2003)308
Runoff Curve Number Method: Examination of the Initial Abstraction Ratio
resolves10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00242-X
Short term streamflow forecasting using artificial neural networks
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.033
Increasing streamflow and baseflow in Mississippi River since the 1940s: Effect of land use change
resolves10.1016/j.engappai.2008.02.007
Design of ensemble neural network using the Akaike information criterion
resolves10.1029/2007WR006665
Responses of streamflow to climate and land surface change in the headwaters of the Yellow River Basin
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBras, R.L., 1990. Hyrology: An Introduction to Hydrologic Sciences. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.032_b0065
no DOI — not checkedCrim, J.F., 2007. Water Quality Changes Across an Urban–Rural Land Use Gradient in Streams of the West Georgia Piedmont. M.Sc. Thesis. Auburn Univ., Auburn, Alabama.
no DOI — not checkedComputation of direct runoff amounts from storm rainfall
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.032_b0120
no DOI — not checkedMATLAB version 7.10.0, 2010. Computer Software. The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts.
no DOI — not checkedStreamflow forecasting based on artificial neural networks
no DOI — not checkedSchoonover, J.S., 2005. Hydrology, Water Quality, and Channel Morphology Across an Urban–Rural Land Use Gradient in the Georgia piedmont, USA. Ph.D. Diss. Auburn Univ., Auburn, Alabama.
no DOI — not checkedModelling hydrological responses to land use and climatic change: a Southern African perspective
no DOI — not checkedSCS, 1986. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Tech. Release No. 55. Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., Washington D.C.
no DOI — not checkedSoil Survey Staff, 2011. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database for Georgia. <http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov> (accessed 03.10.11).
no DOI — not checkedTrimble, S.W., 2008. Man-Induced Soil Erosion on the Southern Piedmont: 1700–1970, second ed. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA.
no DOI — not checkedUnited States Forest Service (USFS), 2005. Ecological Subregions of the United States. Department of Agriculture. <http://www.fs.fed.us/land/pubs/ecoregions/ch20.html> (accessed 05.16.11).
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.032_b0330
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.032"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.032/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.032)