Reference health

Monitoring the ecosystem service provided by dung beetles offers benefits over commonly used biodiversity metrics and a traditional trapping method

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.12.004
CiteStamped reference-health badge
46/46 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

11 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 46 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1526-100X.1993.tb00022.x
Ants as Indicators of Restoration Success at a Uranium Mine in Tropical Australia
resolves10.1016/j.ecoinf.2009.12.002
Using Generalised Dissimilarity Models and many small samples to improve the efficiency of regional and landscape scale invertebrate sampling
resolves10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00116-6
Ghost crabs as a tool for rapid assessment of human impacts on exposed sandy beaches
resolves10.1111/j.1442-8903.2004.00171.x
A practical technique for non‐destructive monitoring of soil surface invertebrates for ecological restoration programmes
resolves10.1023/A:1009638706789
Measuring Spider Richness: Effects of Different Sampling Methods and Spatial and Temporal Scales
resolves10.1007/s003740000315
Effects of fungal inocula on the decomposition of lignin and structural polysaccharides in Pinus sylvestris litter
resolves10.1016/S0031-4056(24)00225-7
Digging out the “digging-in effect” of pitfall traps: Influences of depletion and disturbance on catches of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
resolves10.2307/1467734
A Brief History of Volunteer Biological Water Monitoring Using Macroinvertebrates
resolves10.1071/WR01059
Monitoring bait removal in vertebrate pest control: a comparison using track identification and remote photography
resolves10.1007/s10531-010-9882-1
Using spider web types as a substitute for assessing web-building spider biodiversity and the success of habitat restoration
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.09.007
Can ants be used as ecological indicators of restoration progress in dynamic environments? A case study in a revegetated riparian zone
resolves10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00115.x
The ratio of exotic‐to‐native dung beetles can indicate habitat quality in riparian restoration
resolves10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00108-X
The assessment of restoration of habitat in urban wetlands
resolves10.2307/2632
Pitfall Trapping as a Method for Studying Populations of Carabidae (Coleoptera)
resolves10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900208.x
Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation‐induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship
resolves10.1071/IS02009
Short-range endemism amongst the Australian fauna: some examples from non-marine environments
resolves10.1007/s00267-004-0211-x
Terrestrial and Aquatic Invertebrates as Bioindicators for Environmental Monitoring, with Particular Reference to Mountain Ecosystems
resolves10.1016/0038-0717(94)00164-V
A community-level concept of controls on decomposition processes: Decomposition of barley straw by Phanerochaete chrysosporium or Phlebia radiata in pure or mixed culture
resolves10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.012
Using monitoring data gathered by volunteers to predict the potential distribution of the invasive alien bumblebee Bombus terrestris
resolves10.1603/0046-225X-34.6.1566
Evaluation of Sampling Methods and Species Richness Estimators for Ants in Upland Ecosystems in Florida
resolves10.1560/IJEE.54.1.89
Getting the Public Involved in Butterfly Conservation: Lessons Learned from a New Monitoring Scheme in Germany
resolves10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00042.x
Trap Spacing and Transect Design for Dung Beetle Biodiversity Studies<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.10.002
Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services
resolves10.1071/SR9930083
Defining soil macrofauna composition and activity for biopedological studies - A case study on two soils in the Western Australian wheat belt
resolves10.1016/0038-0717(93)90153-3
Ant composition and activity in naturally-vegetated and farmland environments on contrasting soils at kellerberrin, western australia
resolves10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.01981.x
Linking ecological function to species composition in ecological restoration: Seed removal by ants in recreated woodland
resolves10.1098/rspb.2000.1366
Microbial diversity, producer–decomposer interactions and ecosystem processes: a theoretical model
resolves10.1007/BF00348110
Some features influencing the efficiency of pitfall traps
resolves10.1111/j.1523-1739.1988.tb00201.x
A Long‐Term Monitoring Plan for a Threatened Butterfly
resolves10.1046/j.1442-8903.4.s.3.x
Using soil and litter arthropods to assess the state of rainforest restoration
resolves10.2307/2269394
Designing a Cost‐Effective Invertebrate Survey: A Test of Methods for Rapid Assessment of Biodiversity
resolves10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00799.x
Restoration in applied ecology: editor's introduction
resolves10.1007/s10764-007-9136-6
Population Size and Characteristics of Alouatta pigra Before and After a Major Hurricane
resolves10.1007/BF01867730
Importance of insects in environmental impact assessment
resolves10.1673/031.010.9801
Efficacy of Pitfall Trapping, Winkler and Berlese Extraction Methods for Measuring Ground-Dwelling Arthropods in Moist-Deciduous Forests in the Western Ghats
resolves10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091317
Insect Conservation: A Synthetic Management Approach
resolves10.1007/s00040-006-0869-6
Assessing ant assemblages: pitfall trapping versus nest counting (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)
resolves10.1007/s00442-003-1478-y
Decomposition rate of organic substrates in relation to the species diversity of soil saprophytic fungi
resolves10.4039/Ent126881-3
SAMPLING CARABID ASSEMBLAGES WITH PITFALL TRAPS: THE MADNESS AND THE METHOD
resolves10.3354/meps154053
Observer effects and training in underwater visual surveys of reef fishes
resolves10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00757.x
Facilitative interactions rather than resource partitioning drive diversity‐functioning relationships in laboratory fungal communities
resolves10.2307/2404516
Limitations to the Use of Pitfall Traps in Ecological Studies Exemplified by a Study of Spiders in a Field of Winter Wheat
resolves10.1023/A:1006139412372
A Framework for the Design of Ecological Monitoring Programs as a Tool for Environmental and Nature Management
resolves10.1603/EN11285
A Comparison of Dung Beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Attraction to Native and Exotic Mammal Dung
resolves10.1046/j.1526-100X.2001.94010.x
Spiders and Other Arthropods as Indicators in Old‐Growth Versus Logged Redwood Stands
resolves10.1016/j.agee.2006.02.011
Effects of grazing management on beetle and plant assemblages during the re-creation of a flood-plain meadow
The 11 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAnts as indicators of restoration success following mining: A functional group approach
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jnc.2012.12.004_bib0015
no DOI — not checkedAre scats surveys a reliable method for assessing distribution and population status of pine Martens?
no DOI — not checkedDung decomposition and associated beetles in a fragmented temperate forest
no DOI — not checkedScarabaeine dung beetles as indicators of biodiversity, habitat transformation and pest control chemicals in agro-ecosystems: Review article
no DOI — not checkedAn adaptive management scheme for wetland restoration incorporating participatory monitoring into scientific predictions using dragonflies as an indicator taxon
no DOI — not checkedDetermining species boundaries in a world full of rarity: Singletons, species delimitation methods
no DOI — not checkedAnts (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) pass the bioindicator scorecard
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jnc.2012.12.004_bib0210
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.jnc.2012.12.004_bib0215
no DOI — not checkedDry pitfall trapping for vertebrates and invertebrates
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.12.004"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.12.004/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.12.004/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.12.004)