Reference health

First in, best dressed: The presence of order-effect bias in journal ranking surveys

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.005
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 29 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-25

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.2307/1248043
The 28 checked references that resolve
resolves10.5465/AMLE.2009.37012181
When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings
resolves10.1086/269200
Response Effects in Mail Surveys
resolves10.1002/asi.20895
Applying the author affiliation index to library and information science journals
resolves10.1111/1540-6229.00704
A Note on Ranking Real Estate Research Journals
resolves10.1007/s11192-009-0130-y
The distribution of the uncitedness factor and its functional relation with the impact factor
resolves10.1080/01690960903148987
First things first: Order bias in deontic disjunctions
resolves10.1126/science.178.4060.471
Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation
resolves10.1145/265684.265700
Forums for MIS scholars
resolves10.1002/asi.20679
A publication power approach for identifying premier information systems journals
resolves10.1016/0149-7189(90)90021-N
Can response order bias evaluations?
resolves10.1007/s11192-007-1895-5
Ranking Taiwanese management journals: A case study
resolves10.1002/acp.2350050305
Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys
resolves10.1086/269029
An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement
resolves10.1023/A:1014804608785
Researchers" and users" perceptions of the relative standing of biomedical papers in different journals
resolves10.1109/TPC.2007.908733
A Scientometric Study of the Perceived Quality of Business and Technical Communication Journals
resolves10.17705/1jais.00045
Global Journal Prestige and Supporting Disciplines: A Scientometric Study of Information Systems Journals
resolves10.1145/383694.383701
On site
resolves10.1086/268251
Controlling Order-Effect Bias
resolves10.1177/0021943607306138
The Impact of Perceptions of Journal Quality on Business and Management Communication Academics
resolves10.2307/2095149
The Norm of Even-Handedness in Surveys as in Life
resolves10.1108/13673270910931125
Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals
resolves10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.005
What's familiar is excellent: The impact of exposure effect on perceived journal quality
resolves10.1016/j.joi.2011.06.002
Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of Artificial Intelligence
resolves10.1002/cjas.214
Investigating Information Systems Research in Canada
resolves10.17705/1jais.00203
Assessing Scholarly Influence: Using the Hirsch Indices to Reframe the Discourse
resolves10.1145/203330.203348
Forums for management information systems scholars
resolves10.1287/isre.10.2.99
Research Commentary. Academic Rewards for Teaching, Research, and Service: Data and Discourse
resolves10.3758/s13423-011-0089-6
The response order effect: People believe the first person who remembers an event
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.005_bib0045
no DOI — not checkedLogic and conversation
no DOI — not checkedIdentifying and evaluating the universe of outlets for information systems research: Ranking the journals
no DOI — not checkedInformation order and outcome framing: An assessment of judgment bias in a naturalistic decision-making context
no DOI — not checkedImpact factor: A valid measure of journal quality?
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.005_bib0135
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.005_bib0160
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.005"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.005/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.005/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.005)