Reference health
Integrating conservation targets and ecosystem services in landscape spatial planning from Portugal
35/35 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
17 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 35 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0158350
Using Optimal Land-Use Scenarios to Assess Trade-Offs between Conservation, Development, and Social Values
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.416
Cost-effective restoration and conservation planning in Green and Blue Infrastructure designs. A case study on the Intercontinental Biosphere Reserve of the Mediterranean: Andalusia (Spain) – Morocco
resolves10.3097/LO.200915
Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services - A concept for land-cover based assessments
resolves10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7
Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0024378
Ecosystem Services in Conservation Planning: Targeted Benefits vs. Co-Benefits or Costs?
resolves10.1007/s10980-018-0707-z
Setting conservation priorities in cities: approaches, targets and planning units adapted to wetland biodiversity and ecosystem services
resolves10.1111/2041-210X.13349
Operationalizing ecological connectivity in spatial conservation planning with Marxan Connect
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.348
Social equity shapes zone-selection: Balancing aquatic biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services delivery in the transboundary Danube River Basin
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.064
Optimal conservation planning of multiple hydrological ecosystem services under land use and climate changes in Teshio river watershed, northernmost of Japan
resolves10.1038/s41598-020-64668-z
Identifying trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services delivery for land-use decisions
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104493
Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning
resolves10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108
Revision of the Common International Classification for Ecosystem Services (CICES V5.1): A Policy Brief
resolves10.1002/pan3.10120
Biocultural approaches to sustainability: A systematic review of the scientific literature
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016
Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach
resolves10.1002/aqc.2891
Catchment zoning to enhance co‐benefits and minimize trade‐offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservation
resolves10.1007/s10980-016-0446-y
Ecosystem services and connectivity in spatial conservation prioritization
resolves10.5751/ES-11305-250103
Indigenous and local knowledge in sustainability transformations research: a literature review
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.164
Designing a network of green infrastructure to enhance the conservation value of protected areas and maintain ecosystem services
resolves10.1007/s10113-018-1457-9
Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation
resolves10.1038/s41597-019-0300-6
Global hydro-environmental sub-basin and river reach characteristics at high spatial resolution
resolves10.1111/2041-210X.13381
A practical method for evaluating spatial biodiversity offset scenarios based on spatial conservation prioritization outputs
resolves10.1038/nature14032
Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism
resolves10.1016/j.ecocom.2016.03.006
Effects of budget constraints on conservation network design for biodiversity and ecosystem services
resolves10.1016/j.jnc.2019.125714
Systematic conservation planning: Trends and patterns among highly-cited papers
resolves10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101141
Ecological Models Revisited: Their Uses and Evolution in Health Promotion Over Two Decades
resolves10.1111/acv.12387
Effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network in protecting Iberian endemic fauna
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0112557
Ecosystem Services and Opportunity Costs Shift Spatial Priorities for Conserving Forest Biodiversity
resolves10.2478/bog-2019-0017
Local planning attitudes: Comparative content analysis of municipal director plans of shrinking Portuguese cities
resolves10.3897/natureconservation.4.3626
Effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network to cover threatened species
resolves10.1111/cobi.13276
Effects of human demand on conservation planning for biodiversity and ecosystem services
resolves10.1111/cobi.12257
Integrating Biological and Social Values When Prioritizing Places for Biodiversity Conservation
The 17 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104213_b0010
no DOI — not checkedMarxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104213_b0040
no DOI — not checkedD. da República Estratégia Nacional de Conservação da Natureza e Biodiversidade 2030. Resolução do Conselho de Ministros 2018 Série I de 2018–05–07.
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission, 2020. EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing nature back into our lives. European Commision No. COM (2020) 380 final.
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission, 2019. The European Green Deal. European Commision No. COM/2019/640 final.
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission, 2013. Green Infrastructure (GI) - Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital. European Commision No. COM/2013/0249 final.
no DOI — not checkedGame, E.T., Grantham, H.S., 2008. Marxan User Manual: For Marxan version 1.8.10.
no DOI — not checkedICNB, 2020. Plano Sectorial da Rede Natura 2000. Sítio Sicó-Alvaiázere (PTCON0045). Available at: http://www2.icnf.pt/portal/pn/biodiversidade/rn2000/resource/doc/sic-cont/sico-alvaiazere (last accessed: September 10, 2020).
no DOI — not checkedINE, 2011. Censos 2011.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104213_b0160
no DOI — not checkedIUCN IUCN Red List categories and criteria, version 3.1 second edition 2012 Gland and Cambridge.
no DOI — not checkedMaes, J., Fabrega, N., Zulian, G., Barbosa, A., Vizcaino, P., Ivits, E., Polce, C., Vandecasteele, I., Rivero, I.M., Guerra, C., Perpiña Castillo, C., Vallecillo, S., Baranzelli, C., Barranco, R., Batista e Silva, F., Jacobs-Crisoni, J., Trombetti, M., Lavalle, C., 2015. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Service: Trends in ecosystems and ecosystem services in the European Union between 2000 and 2010. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
no DOI — not checkedMEA Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, The millennium ecosystem assessment series 2005 Island Press Washington, DC.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104213_b0215
no DOI — not checkedGlobal futures: Assessing the global economic impacts of environmental change to support policy-making
no DOI — not checkedUN General Assembly, 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (No. A/RES/70/1).
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104213"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104213/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104213)