Reference health
Pathways of demographic and urban development and their effects on land take and ecosystem services: The case of Lisbon Metropolitan Area, Portugal
38/38 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
29 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 38 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.020
The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: A framework for supporting innovation
resolves10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.07.006
Mapping topsoil physical properties at European scale using the LUCAS database
resolves10.1007/s13280-014-0507-x
Contribution of Ecosystem Services to Air Quality and Climate Change Mitigation Policies: The Case of Urban Forests in Barcelona, Spain
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.014
Ecosystem properties, potentials and services – The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.006
Quantification of ecosystem services: Beyond all the “guesstimates”, how do we get real data?
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.052
Assessing land take and its effects on dune carbon pools. An insight into the Mediterranean coastline
resolves10.1080/1747423X.2014.994567
Can the 2050 zero land take objective of the EU be reliably monitored? A comparative study
resolves10.1098/rspb.2010.2754
The impact of projected increases in urbanization on ecosystem services
resolves10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010
Designing a knowledge co-production operating space for urban environmental governance—Lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany
resolves10.1080/09640568.2014.899490
Land take and food security: assessment of land take on the agricultural production in Europe
resolves10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.003
Integrating ecosystem services into spatial planning—A spatial decision support tool
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0066531
Endless Urban Growth? On the Mismatch of Population, Household and Urban Land Area Growth and Its Effects on the Urban Debate
resolves10.7160/aol.2016.080104
Temporal Trajectories of HR/VHR Pixels and Detection of Land Take Processes
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.062
Exploring local consequences of two land-use alternatives for the supply of urban ecosystem services in Stockholm year 2050
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.022
Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural–urban gradient: A cross-analysis of European cities
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.028
Mapping transition potential with stakeholder- and policy-driven scenarios in Rotterdam City
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.017
The effects of growth, shrinkage, population aging and preference shifts on urban development—A spatial scenario analysis of Berlin, Germany
resolves10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.011
Participatory selection of ecosystem services for spatial planning: Insights from the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, Portugal
resolves10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.06.002
Urban effects, distance, and protected areas in an urbanizing world
resolves10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.014
Conformance in land-use planning: The determinants of decision, conversion and transgression
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018
Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU
resolves10.1002/wcc.63
Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment
resolves10.1108/MEQ-01-2015-0004
Land take effects on airborne fluxes: a proposal for future research development
resolves10.1016/j.eiar.2015.05.006
Assessing land take by urban development and its impact on carbon storage: Findings from two case studies in Italy
resolves10.4018/IJAEIS.2015100101
Scenarios and Modeling of Land Use and Cover Changes in Portugal from 1980 to 2040
resolves10.1016/j.eiar.2010.02.002
Assessing climate impacts of planning policies—An estimation for the urban region of Leipzig (Germany)
resolves10.1016/j.envres.2015.11.030
Linking trajectories of land change, land degradation processes and ecosystem services
resolves10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.001
Above-ground carbon storage by urban trees in Leipzig, Germany: Analysis of patterns in a European city
resolves10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.001
Assessing the landscape and ecological quality of urban green spaces in a compact city
resolves10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.012
Monitoring land take by point sampling: Pace and dynamics of urban expansion in the Metropolitan City of Rome
The 29 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedHow smart growth and green infrastructure can mutually support each other — a conceptual framework for compact and green cities
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0045
no DOI — not checkedSustainability assessment of urban policy scenarios: analysing the impacts of land use-transportation interaction in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0060
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0065
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0075
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0080
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0085
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0095
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0100
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0105
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0125
no DOI — not checkedUrban ecosystem services
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0150
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0155
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0165
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0170
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0175
no DOI — not checkedApplications of biodiversity and ecosystem services impact assessment in spatial planning
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0215
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0220
no DOI — not checkedMapping ecosystem services
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0240
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0245
no DOI — not checkedLandscape planning for minimizing land consumption
no DOI — not checkedPatterns of housing demand under uncertainty: a case study in Lisbon
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0270
no DOI — not checkedUndervalued and under pressure: A plea for greater attention toward regulating ecosystem services
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056_bib0330
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.056)