Reference health
A comparison of six methods for genomic DNA extraction suitable for PCR-based genotyping applications using ovine milk samples
21/21 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 21 checked references that resolve
resolves10.3168/jds.2007-0149
Technical Note: A Simple Salting-Out Method for DNA Extraction from Milk Somatic Cells: Investigation into the Goat CSN1S1 Gene
resolves10.3168/jds.2007-0507
Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Milk Yield and Protein Percentage in a Three-Country Brown Swiss Population
resolves10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77536-0
Milk as a Source of Deoxyribonucleic Acid and as a Substrate for the Polymerase Chain Reaction
resolves10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73412-8
Rapid Detection of Cows’ Milk in Sheeps’ and Goats’ Milk by a Species-Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction Technique
resolves10.1016/j.mimet.2007.03.017
Comparison of four different methods for extraction of Stachybotrys chartarum spore DNA and verification by real-time PCR
resolves10.1128/JCM.41.6.2440-2443.2003
Comparison of Commercial DNA Extraction Kits for Extraction of Bacterial Genomic DNA from Whole-Blood Samples
resolves10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00044-5
Evaluation of a PCR technique for the detection of Maedi-Visna proviral DNA in blood, milk and tissue samples of naturally infected sheep
resolves10.1128/JCM.38.10.3860-3863.2000
Comparison of Six Commercial DNA Extraction Kits for Recovery of Cytomegalovirus DNA from Spiked Human Specimens
resolves10.1002/jcla.20174
Comparison of manual and automated nucleic acid extraction from whole‐blood samples
resolves10.1097/00029330-200606020-00004
Comparison of three methods for isolation of nucleic acids from membranate inner ear tissue of rats
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2303.2005.00239.x
Comparison of DNA extraction from cervical cells collected in PreservCyt solution for the amplification of <i>Chlamydia trachomatis</i>
resolves10.1016/j.mcp.2005.12.003
A comparison of five methods for extracting DNA from paucicellular clinical samples
resolves10.1099/jmm.0.46510-0
Comparison of DNA extraction methods for Aspergillus fumigatus using real-time PCR
resolves10.1002/pd.1605
Improvement in fetal DNA extraction from maternal plasma. Evaluation of the NucliSens Magnetic Extraction system and the QIAamp DSP Virus Kit in comparison with the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit
resolves10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.09.009
Assessment of the quality and quantity of genomic DNA recovered from canine blood samples by three different extraction methods
resolves10.1007/s00705-004-0303-1
Prion protein allele A136H154Q171 is associated with high susceptibility to scrapie in purebred and crossbred German Merinoland sheep
resolves10.1016/j.ab.2006.01.051
SPUD: A quantitative PCR assay for the detection of inhibitors in nucleic acid preparations
resolves10.1016/S0921-4488(00)00190-5
Udder disease etiology, milk somatic cell counts and NAGase activity in Israeli Assaf sheep throughout lactation
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedPsifidi A, Dovas CI, Basdagianni Z, Bouzalas I, Banos G. Assessing scrapie risk in daity sheep flocks. In: Proceedings of the 2009 annual meeting british society of animal science, Scarborough, UK, 31 March–2 April, 2008, p. 25.
no DOI — not checkedUse of milk samples from a milk evaluation programme for the genotyping of cows
no DOI — not checkedIsolation of mRNA and genomic DNA from epithelial cells in human milk and amplified by PCR
no DOI — not checkedIsolation of genomic DNA from milk samples by using Chelex resin
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.mcp.2009.11.001_bib10
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.mcp.2009.11.001"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.mcp.2009.11.001/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.mcp.2009.11.001)