Reference health
Comprehensive evaluation of the carbon footprint components of wastewater treatment plants located in the Baltic Sea region
25/25 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
14 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 25 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.020
Environmental and economic performance assessment of the integrated urban wastewater system
resolves10.3390/w7030918
Carbon Footprint Analyses of Mainstream Wastewater Treatment Technologies under Different Sludge Treatment Scenarios in China
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124053
The application of footprints for assessing the sustainability of wastewater treatment plants: A review
resolves10.2166/wst.2013.109
Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from municipal wastewater treatment – results from a long-term study
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.177
Greenhouse gas emission quantification from wastewater treatment plants, using a tracer gas dispersion method
resolves10.1016/j.watres.2011.02.028
Floc-based sequential partial nitritation and anammox at full scale with contrasting N2O emissions
resolves10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105959
Carbon footprint of constructed wetlands for winery wastewater treatment
resolves10.2166/wpt.2020.084
Upgrade of the Taskila WWTP with an MBR line: the first treatment results, performance assessment and lessons learnt
resolves10.2166/wst.2016.390
Operating costs and energy demand of wastewater treatment plants in Austria: benchmarking results of the last 10 years
resolves10.2166/wst.2012.317
Potentials and limits of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: Energy self-sufficient municipal wastewater treatment plant?
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.043
Monitoring and diagnosis of energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants. A state of the art and proposals for improvement
resolves10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122647
Energy neutrality versus carbon footprint minimization in municipal wastewater treatment plants
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.255
A plant-wide wastewater treatment plant model for carbon and energy footprint: Model application and scenario analysis
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117673
Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from Iran's domestic wastewater sector and modeling the emission scenarios by 2030
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148479
Advances in technological control of greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater in the context of circular economy
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141288
Analysis of empirical methods for the quantification of N2O emissions in wastewater treatment plants: Comparison of emission results obtained from the IPCC Tier 1 methodology and the methodologies that integrate operational data
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.286
Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from a plug-flow full-scale bioreactor and assessment of its carbon footprint
resolves10.2175/193864706783710938
Kemicond – Improvement of the Dewaterability of Sewage Sludge by Chemical Treatment
resolves10.2175/106143008X268498
Significance of Design and Operational Variables in Chemical Phosphorus Removal
resolves10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116126
Integrated plant-wide modelling for evaluation of the energy balance and greenhouse gas footprint in large wastewater treatment plants
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.024
Comparative energy and carbon footprint analysis of biosolids management strategies in water resource recovery facilities
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedKemicond - acid oxidative sludge conditioning process
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150436_bb0040
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150436_bb0045
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150436_bb0055
no DOI — not checkedEutrophication - supplementary report. HELCOM thematic assessment of eutrophication 2011–2016
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150436_bb0080
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150436_bb0085
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150436_bb0090
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150436_bb0100
no DOI — not checkedRemoval of phosphorus by metallic coagulation: an experimental aid to dose computations
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150436_bb0130
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150436_bb0135
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150436_bb0145
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150436_bb0190
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150436"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150436/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150436)