Reference health
Towards sustainable pedestrian mobility in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia: A case study
51/51 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-09
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
28 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 51 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/s10668-019-00417-1
Sustainable urban planning strategies for mitigating climate change in Saudi Arabia
resolves10.4103/sjg.SJG_617_18
Overweight and obesity among Saudi children and adolescents: Where do we stand today?
resolves10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.031
Web based survey to measuring social interactions, values, attitudes and travel behavior
resolves10.1016/j.trd.2020.102330
Sustainable mobility: Policy design and implementation in three Norwegian cities
resolves10.1016/j.trc.2015.05.007
How comfortable are your cycling tracks? A new method for objective bicycle vibration measurement
resolves10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1478
Walking, Bicycling, and Urban Landscapes: Evidence From the San Francisco Bay Area
resolves10.1080/15568310802178314
Influences of Built Environments on Walking and Cycling: Lessons from Bogotá
resolves10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.10.004
A comparative evaluation of large-scale personal travel planning projects in England
resolves10.1016/j.cstp.2014.08.006
Modeling travel choices of students at a private, urban university: Insights and policy implications
resolves10.1016/j.scs.2018.07.021
Involving people in the building up of smart and sustainable cities: How to influence commuters’ behaviors through a mobile app game
resolves10.1016/j.scs.2019.101578
Linking social, semantic and sentiment analyses to support modeling transit customers’ satisfaction: Towards formal study of opinion dynamics
resolves10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s223
Identifying and Measuring Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability
resolves10.1080/15568318.2018.1531183
How to evaluate the extent of mobility strategies in a university campus: An integrated analysis of impacts
resolves10.1016/j.jth.2018.01.014
Bicycle choice modeling: A study of university trips in a small Colombian city
resolves10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2451.2003.05502003.x
Making concepts matter: sustainable mobility and indicator systems in transport policy<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.3390/geosciences10020076
Three-Dimensional Response of the Supported-Deep Excavation System: Case Study of a Large Scale Underground Metro Station
resolves10.1016/j.rser.2018.01.012
A review of the European passenger car regulations – Real driving emissions vs local air quality
resolves10.1016/j.scs.2016.01.001
How the present would have looked like? Impact of non-motorized transport and public transport infrastructure on travel behavior, energy consumption and CO 2 emissions – Delhi, Pune and Patna
resolves10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.001
A comparison of three methods for assessing the walkability of the pedestrian environment
resolves10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.08.012
Comparing pedestrians’ needs and behaviours in different land use environments
resolves10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.006
Travel behavior of university students who live on campus: A case study of a rural university in Asia
resolves10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.029
Evaluating sustainability and innovation of mobility patterns in Spanish cities. Analysis by size and urban typology
resolves10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.07.002
Non-motorized transport and university populations: an analysis of connectivity and network perceptions
resolves10.1016/j.trip.2020.100129
The ultimate smart mobility combination for sustainable transport? A case study on shared electric automated mobility initiatives in the Netherlands
resolves10.1080/15568318.2017.1377326
What drives sustainable student travel? Mode choice determinants in the Greater Toronto Area
resolves10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.002
Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a participatory assessment method: A case study in Lisbon
resolves10.1016/j.scs.2016.08.025
Environmental assessment of 9 European public bus transportation systems
resolves10.1016/j.scs.2013.06.001
A climate of change: A transition approach for climate neutrality in the city of Ghent (Belgium)
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000094
Perceptions of Pedestrians and Shopkeepers in European Medium-Sized Cities: Study of Guimarães, Portugal
resolves10.1016/j.cstp.2020.02.005
Sustainable mobility patterns to university campuses: Evaluation and constraints
resolves10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552
Neighborhood-Based Differences in Physical Activity: An Environment Scale Evaluation
resolves10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures
resolves10.3390/su12041693
Why Don’t People Ride Bicycles in High-Income Developing Countries, and Can Bike-Sharing Be the Solution? The Case of Qatar
resolves10.1002/atr.1383
The influence of bus service satisfaction on university students' mode choice
resolves10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.11.002
Active commuting in a university setting: Assessing commuting habits and potential for modal change
resolves10.1016/j.cstp.2017.11.007
Barriers, motivators and strategies for sustainable mobility at the USP campus in São Carlos, Brazil
resolves10.3141/2299-06
Measuring Nonmotorized Accessibility and Connectivity in a Robust Pedestrian Network
resolves10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.003
Does commuting time tolerance impede sustainable urban mobility? Analysing the impacts on commuting behaviour as a result of workplace relocation to a mixed-use centre in Lisbon
resolves10.1016/j.scs.2019.101671
Assessment of urban human mobility perturbation under extreme weather events: A case study in Nanjing, China
resolves10.1080/15568318.2016.1159357
Proactive sustainable university transportation: Marginal effects, intrinsic values, and university students' mode choice
The 28 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0005
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0015
no DOI — not checkedIn-person and virtual balanced technique for geotechnical engineering laboratories
no DOI — not checkedThe economic assessment of health benefits of active transport
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0075
no DOI — not checkedAre Asian cities leading the way to sustainable mobility?
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0100
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0110
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0155
no DOI — not checkedAnalysis of the modal choice of transport at the case of University: Case of University of the Basque Country of San Sebastian
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0175
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0190
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0225
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0240
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0260
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0270
no DOI — not checkedRelative importance index of sustainable design and construction activities criteria for Green Highway
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0305
no DOI — not checkedSaudi Vision. (2030), National Transformation Program, 2018. https://vision2030.gov.sa/sites/default/files/attachments/NTP%20English%20Public%20Document_2810.pdf [Accessed 18 November 2020].
no DOI — not checkedSaudi Vision. (2030), SAUDIVISION2030 | SAUDI VISION 2030. https://vision2030.gov.sa/en/node/243 [Accessed 18 November 2020].
no DOI — not checkedBus public transport energy consumption and emissions versus individual transportation
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0340
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0355
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0360
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0365
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831_bib0370
no DOI — not checkedUnion of Concerned Scientists, Each Country’s Share of CO2 Emissions. Published (2008, July), Updated 12 August 2020. https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/each-countrys-share-co2-emissions [Accessed 18 November 2020).
no DOI — not checkedPolicy implementation lessons from six road pricing cases
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831)