Reference health

Evaluation of two Fasciola hepatica faecal egg counting protocols in sheep and cattle

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109435
CiteStamped reference-health badge
36/36 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-24

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 36 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/B978-0-12-800182-0.00002-7
Techniques for the Diagnosis of Fasciola Infections in Animals
resolves10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00026-6
The sensitivity and specificity of two methods for detecting Fasciola infections in cattle
resolves10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.11.003
Comparison of molecular and conventional methods for the diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica infection in the field
resolves10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using <b>lme4</b>
resolves10.1007/s00436-016-5003-8
Sensitivity and efficiency of selected coproscopical methods—sedimentation, combined zinc sulfate sedimentation-flotation, and McMaster method
resolves10.1186/s12917-017-1326-7
The recovery of added nematode eggs from horse and sheep faeces by three methods
resolves10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.04.012
Comparative kinetics of serological and coproantigen ELISA and faecal egg count in cattle experimentally infected with Fasciola hepatica and following treatment with triclabendazole
resolves10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.01.004
Comparison of early detection of Fasciola hepatica in experimentally infected Merino sheep by real-time PCR, coproantigen ELISA and sedimentation
resolves10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.01.035
Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of coprological and serological techniques for the diagnosis of fasciolosis in cattle
resolves10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00016-X
Evaluation of a simple sedimentation method (modified McMaster) for diagnosis of bovine fascioliosis
resolves10.1038/nprot.2009.235
FLOTAC: new multivalent techniques for qualitative and quantitative copromicroscopic diagnosis of parasites in animals and humans
resolves10.1136/vr.100588
Composite faecal egg count reduction test to detect resistance to triclabendazole in <i>Fasciola hepatica</i>
resolves10.1017/S0022149X00033125
A New Technique for Counting Eggs of<i>Fasciola hepatica</i>in Cattle Faeces
resolves10.1016/j.exppara.2010.04.020
Fasciola hepatica: Comparison of the sedimentation and FLOTAC techniques for the detection and quantification of faecal egg counts in rats
resolves10.1079/JOH2005298
Triclabendazole: new skills to unravel an old(ish) enigma
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0016126
Predicting Impacts of Climate Change on Fasciola hepatica Risk
resolves10.1016/0304-4017(89)90162-3
Dynamics of elimination of the eggs of Fasciola hepatica (Trematoda, Digenea) in the faeces of cattle in the Porma Basin, Spain
resolves10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.02.009
On farm evaluation of the coproantigen ELISA and coproantigen reduction test in Scottish sheep naturally infected with Fasciola hepatica
resolves10.1136/vr.105128
Composite <i>Fasciola hepatica</i> faecal egg sedimentation test for cattle
resolves10.1136/vr.105162
Cattle and sheep farmers’ opinions on the provision and use of abattoir rejection data in the United Kingdom
resolves10.1111/j.1751-0813.1969.tb05009.x
QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS OF CHRONIC FASCIOLOSIS
resolves10.7717/peerj.616
Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution
resolves10.1186/s13071-015-1271-x
Confirmation of Galba truncatula as an intermediate host snail for Calicophoron daubneyi in Great Britain, with evidence of alternative snail species hosting Fasciola hepatica
resolves10.1590/S0102-09352005000200007
Comparison of two coprological methods for the veterinary diagnosis of fasciolosis
resolves10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.11.021
Evaluation of a recombinant cathepsin L1 ELISA and comparison with the Pourquier and ES ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Fasciola hepatica
resolves10.2307/2529310
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
resolves10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.10.033
Novel insights into the pathogenic importance, diagnosis and treatment of the rumen fluke (Calicophoron daubneyi) in cattle
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0161621
Evaluation of the Performance of Five Diagnostic Tests for Fasciola hepatica Infection in Naturally Infected Cattle Using a Bayesian No Gold Standard Approach
resolves10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.04.021
Effects of aggregation and sample size on composite faecal egg counts in sheep
resolves10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.05.015
Comparison of fecal egg counting methods in four livestock species
resolves10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.06.001
Estimating the true prevalence of Fasciola hepatica in cattle slaughtered in Switzerland in the absence of an absolute diagnostic test
resolves10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00095-X
Performance characteristics of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica) infection in sheep and cattle
resolves10.4081/gh.2015.353
Sheep and Fasciola hepatica in Europe: the GLOWORM experience
resolves10.1016/j.rvsc.2004.08.005
Development of an antibody-detection ELISA for Fasciola hepatica and its evaluation against a commercially available test
resolves10.1136/vr.e5357
Diagnosis of triclabendazole resistance in <i>Fasciola hepatica</i>
resolves10.4269/ajtmh.18-0988
Comparison of Kato-Katz Thick Smear, Mini-FLOTAC, and Flukefinder for the Detection and Quantification of Fasciola hepatica Eggs in Artificially Spiked Human Stool
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedFasciola and fasciolosis in ruminants in Europe: identifying research needs
no DOI — not checkedA fast and accurate fecal examination technique for diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica
no DOI — not checkedFluctuation within a day in the Liver Fluke egg count of the rectal contents of cattle
no DOI — not checkedLiver Fluke - an overview for practitioners
no DOI — not checked10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109435_bib0200
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109435"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109435/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109435/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109435)