Reference health

A reassessment of the anamorph genus Chaetopsina (Hyphomycetes)

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1536(85)80267-9
CiteStamped reference-health badge
8/8 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

6 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 8 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/00275514.1983.12023781
<i>Cylindrotrichum, Chaetopsis</i>, and Two New Genera of Hyphomycetes,<i>Kylindria</i>and<i>Xenokylindria</i>
resolves10.5962/p.416990
New or interesting microfungi XIV. Dematiaceous hyphomycetes from Mt Kenya
resolves10.5962/p.417906
Notes on hyphomycetes XXXI. Chaetopsina auburnensis sp. nov.
resolves10.1139/b73-024
New Hyphomycetes from South Carolina
resolves10.1080/11263507609426401
« Chaetopsina ivoriensis » a new species of Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes
resolves10.1016/S0007-1536(79)80160-6
Chaetopsina species from tropical forest litter
resolves10.5962/p.416935
Four new species of Nectria and their Chaetopsina anamorphs
resolves10.1016/S0007-1536(69)80131-2
Endophragmia alternata sp.nov. and other hyphomycetes on Pinus leaves in Japan
The 6 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0007-1536(85)80267-9_bib1
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0007-1536(85)80267-9_bib3
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0007-1536(85)80267-9_bib5
no DOI — not checkedHyphomycetes rari o interessanti della foresta tropicale. III. Contributo alla conoscenza del genere Chaetopsina Rambelli
no DOI — not checkedChaetopsina nuovo genere di ifali demaziacei
no DOI — not checkedEucalyptus microfungi : some setose Hyphomycetes with phialides
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0007-1536(85)80267-9"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0007-1536(85)80267-9/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0007-1536(85)80267-9/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0007-1536(85)80267-9)