Response to “Comments on ‘Testing winter wheat simulation models predictions against observed UK grain yields by Landau et al. [Agric. For. Meteorol. 89 (1998) 85–99]’ by Jamieson et al. [Agric. For. Meteorol., this issue]”
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
2 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
Simulation Models: Science, Snake Oil, Education, or Engineering?
The 2 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedGoudriaan, J. 1994. Predicting crop yields under global change. In: Walker, B.H., Mooney, H.A. (Eds.), Proc. 1st GCTE Science Conf., May 1994, Woodhole, MA, USA.
no DOI — not checkedLandau, S., Mitchell, R.A.C., Barnett, V., Colls, J.J., Craigon, J., Payne, R.W., 1999. A parsimonious model for wheat yield response to environment, in preparation.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.