Reference health

Restricting virtual weights in data envelopment analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00402-8
CiteStamped reference-health badge
13/13 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 13 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1023/A:1018968909638
Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions
resolves10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Measuring the efficiency of decision making units
resolves10.1016/0304-4076(90)90048-X
Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks
resolves10.1057/jors.1988.96
Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis
resolves10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1
Pitfalls and protocols in DEA
resolves10.1287/mnsc.45.1.103
A Value Efficiency Approach to Incorporating Preference Information in Data Envelopment Analysis
resolves10.1016/0305-0483(93)90042-J
Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA
resolves10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600475
Data envelopment analysis and university selection
resolves10.1057/jors.1996.77
Relationships between Data Envelopment Analysis and Multicriteria Decision Analysis
resolves10.1016/0377-2217(94)00139-4
Exploring output quality targets in the provision of perinatal care in England using data envelopment analysis
resolves10.1287/inte.16.6.35
Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas
resolves10.1016/0304-4076(90)90049-Y
The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming
resolves10.1057/jors.1990.120
Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAllen, R., Dyson, R.G., Santos, A.R., Shale, E., 1997b. Pitfalls and protocols in the application of DEA. Presented at the 39th Annual Conference of the Operational Research Society, Bath, UK, September 1997
no DOI — not checkedDemystifying DEA––a visual interactive approach based on multiple criteria analysis
no DOI — not checkedDEA and MCDM: Competing or complementary approaches
no DOI — not checkedSarrico, C.S., 1998. Performance Measurement in UK Universities: Bringing in the Stakeholders' Perspectives Using Data Envelopment Analysis. PhD Thesis, University of Warwick
no DOI — not checkedUsing DEA for planning in UK universities––an institutional perspective
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00402-8"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00402-8/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00402-8/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00402-8)