Reference health
The association of gender with academic accountant salaries
00017-8/badge.svg){kind=icon}
1 of 13 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-09
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
37 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2329169
The 12 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00442.x
The Familiarity with and Perceived Quality of Accounting Journals: Views of Senior Accounting Faculty in Leading U.S. MBA Programs*
resolves10.1016/0748-5751(87)90038-8
Academic accountants: A study of faculty characteristics and career activities
resolves10.1016/0748-5751(93)90017-D
Research, teaching, and service in promotion and tenure decisions of accounting faculty
The 37 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedFactors motivating academic research in accounting
no DOI — not checkedAmerican Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business (2000). 1999–2000 Salary Survey.
no DOI — not checkedSex discrimination in academe
no DOI — not checkedFaculty salaries
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0748-5751(00)00017-8_BIB8
no DOI — not checkedScholarship reconsidered
no DOI — not checkedAn empirical study of accounting faculty evaluation systems
no DOI — not checkedPublication activity of promoted accounting faculty
no DOI — not checkedFactors contributing to published research by accounting faculties
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0748-5751(00)00017-8_BIB14
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0748-5751(00)00017-8_BIB15
no DOI — not checkedGender differences in the scholarly activities of accounting academics
no DOI — not checkedAn empirical investigation of the publication productivity of promoted accounting faculty
no DOI — not checkedFaculty salaries
no DOI — not checkedContextual effect in measuring accounting faculty perceptions of accounting journals
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0748-5751(00)00017-8_BIB23
no DOI — not checkedAssessing accounting doctoral programs by their graduates' research productivity
no DOI — not checkedFaculty salaries
no DOI — not checkedDeterminants of faculty rank
no DOI — not checkedIssues influencing the decisions of accounting faculty to relocate
no DOI — not checkedHull, R.P., & Wright, G.B. (1990, March). Faculty perceptions of journal quality: an update. Accounting Horizons, 4, 77–98.
no DOI — not checkedAn empirical investigation of the relationship between journal quality ratings and promotion and tenure decisions
no DOI — not checkedJob selection criteria of accounting PhD. students and faculty members
no DOI — not checkedThe economic status of accounting educators
no DOI — not checkedPublication productivity
no DOI — not checkedPublication activity of promoted accounting faculty
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0748-5751(00)00017-8_BIB36
no DOI — not checkedThe potential bias in accounting journal ratings
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0748-5751(00)00017-8_BIB39
no DOI — not checkedPublication productivity and accounting faculty promotion
no DOI — not checkedAACSB accounting accreditation and administrators' attitudes toward criteria for the evaluation of faculty
no DOI — not checkedRansom, M.R. (1993, March). Seniority and monopsony in the academic labor market. American Economic Review, 83, 221–233.
no DOI — not checkedPerceptions of accounting publications outlets
no DOI — not checkedThe changing roles of teaching, research, and service in the promotion and tenure decisions for accounting faculty
no DOI — not checkedRelative contributions of professional journals to the field of accounting
no DOI — not checkedAccounting faculty research productivity and citations
no DOI — not checkedIntegrating rank differences into a model of male-female faculty salary discrimination
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0748-5751(00)00017-8"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0748-5751(00)00017-8/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[00017-8/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0748-5751(00)00017-8)