Reference health
Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation
00201-9/badge.svg){kind=icon}
19/19 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
19 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 19 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/3180269
Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation
resolves10.2307/3147170
Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data
resolves10.1016/0921-8009(95)00021-Z
Issues in ecosystem valuation: improving information for decision making
resolves10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00584-3
Valuation of tropical rainforests: philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation
resolves10.1016/S0313-5926(96)50016-0
Using Contingent Valuation to Determine Australian Tourist’s Values for Forest Conservation in Vanuatu**This study was supported by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) Project 9020 (The Socioeconomic Assessment of Native Forest Preservation Proposals in Vanuatu: Implications for Forest Management.) The assistance of the staff of the Vanuatu Forestry Department, Statistics Department, the National Tourist Board and the Civil Aviation Authority in facilitating the survey reported here is also gratefully acknowledged. Any errors are the responsibility of the authors.
resolves10.2307/3147282
Valuing a Global Environmental Good: U.S. Residents' Willingness to Pay to Protect Tropical Rain Forests
resolves10.2307/3151440
Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data
resolves10.1016/0378-1127(94)03481-B
Rethinking the economic analysis of forests: theory and practice
The 19 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedThe economics of tropical deforestation
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00201-9_BIB5
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00201-9_BIB8
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00201-9_BIB11
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00201-9_BIB16
no DOI — not checkedValuing tropical rain forest protection using the contingent valuation method
no DOI — not checkedOn the design and analysis of simulated choice or allocation experiments in travel choice modelling
no DOI — not checkedConditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour
no DOI — not checkedMorrison, M.D., Blamey, R.K., Bennett, J.W., Louviere, J.J., 1996. A comparison of stated preference techniques for estimating environmental values. Choice Modelling Research Report No. 1. University College, University of New South Wales, Canberra.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00201-9_BIB24
no DOI — not checkedGlobal environmental value and the tropical forests: demonstration and capture
no DOI — not checkedEnvironmental and socioeconomic linkages of deforestation and forest land use change in the Nepal Himalaya
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00201-9_BIB28
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00201-9_BIB31
no DOI — not checkedRolfe, J.C., 1996. Why the cost of performing analysis matters for CV practitioners. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Agricultural Economics, February, Melbourne.
no DOI — not checkedRolfe, J.C., Bennett, J.W., 1996. Valuing international rainforests: a choice modelling approach. Vanuatu Forest Conservation Research Report No. 12. University College, University of New South Wales, Canberra.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00201-9_BIB34
no DOI — not checkedSimulation-based estimation
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00201-9_BIB37
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00201-9"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00201-9/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[00201-9/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00201-9)