Reference health
Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects
00070-1/badge.svg){kind=icon}
29/29 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
22 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 29 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1467-8489.1995.tb00554.x
RESPONDENTS TO CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS: CONSUMERS OR CITIZENS?
resolves10.1023/A:1008377604893
The Validity of Environmental Benefits Transfer: Further Empirical Testing
resolves10.3197/096327199129341851
Public Attitudes to Contingent Valuation and Public Consultation
<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1111/j.1475-4762.1998.tb00044.x
Respondents' evaluations of a CV survey: a case study based on an economic valuation of the Wildlife Enhancement Scheme, Pevensey Levels in East Sussex
resolves10.2307/3147159
Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods
resolves10.1029/91WR02592
Benefit transfer: Conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies
resolves10.1007/BF00056166
Measuring values: A conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to contingent valuation of visibility
resolves10.1029/94WR01051
Benefit transfer protocol for long‐term health risk valuation: A case of surface water contamination
resolves10.2307/1241776
Test‐Retest Reliability of the Contingent Valuation Method: A Comparison of General Population and Visitor Responses
resolves10.1029/91WR02596
The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer: Benefit function transfer
resolves10.1029/94WR02895
Testing Transferability of Recreation Demand Models Across Regions: A Study of Corps of Engineer Reservoirs
resolves10.1029/91WR02593
Benefits and costs of pulp and paper effluent controls under the Clean Water Act
resolves10.1006/jeem.1994.1006
How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation
resolves10.1086/261981
Can Markets Value Air Quality? A Meta-Analysis of Hedonic Property Value Models
resolves10.1006/jeem.1996.0045
Do Contingent Valuation Estimates Pass a “Scope” Test? A Meta-analysis
The 22 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedExistence value, moral commitments and in-kind valuation
no DOI — not checkedReport of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation
no DOI — not checkedBateman, I.J., Brainard, J.S., Lovett, A.A., 1995. Modelling woodland recreation demand using geographical information systems: a benefits transfer study. Global Environmental Change Working Paper 95-06, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), University College London and University of East Anglia, Norwich.
no DOI — not checkedBergland, O., Magnussen, K., Navrud, S., 1995. Benefit transfer: testing for accuracy and reliability. Discussion Paper, #D-03/1995, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway.
no DOI — not checkedBrouwer, R., Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J., Crowards, T.C., Turner, R.K., 1997. A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies. Global Environmental Change Working Paper 97-20, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), University College London and University of East Anglia, Norwich.
no DOI — not checkedEffects of context on economic measures of value
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1_BIB16
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1_BIB19
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1_BIB21
no DOI — not checkedEnvironmental valuation, deliberative democracy and public decision-making institutions
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1_BIB26
no DOI — not checkedValue pluralism, incommensurability and institutions
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1_BIB34
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1_BIB35
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1_BIB36
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1_BIB37
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1_BIB38
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1_BIB44
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1_BIB47
no DOI — not checkedVatn, A., Bromley, D.W., 1995. Choices without prices without apologies. In: Bromley, D.W. (Ed.), The Handbook of Environmental Economics. Blackwell Handbooks in Economics, Cambridge, MA, pp. 3–25.
no DOI — not checkedThe ultimate test. Measuring the benefits of ESAs
no DOI — not checkedWolf, F.M., 1986. Meta-Analysis. Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis. Sage University Paper 07-059. Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00070-1"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00070-1/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[00070-1/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00070-1)