Reference health
The impact of new urban public transport systems: will the expectations be met?
00041-4/badge.svg){kind=icon}
13/13 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
23 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 13 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/01944368508976421
A Dark Side to Light Rail? The Experience of Three New Transit Systems
resolves10.1080/01944369608975669
Big-City Transit Rider snip, Deficits, and Politics: Avoiding Reality in Boston
resolves10.1002/atr.5670210303
Choosing the wrong technology: Or how to spend billions and reduce transit use
resolves10.1080/01944369008975758
Deception in Dallas: Strategic Misrepresentation in Rail Transit Promotion and Evaluation
resolves10.1016/S0198-9715(96)00020-8
An expert system to advise on urban public transport technologies
resolves10.1177/0739456X9301300107
Commentary on "The Recent Popularity of Light Rail Transit in North America"
resolves10.1080/01441649508716910
Deregulation of local bus services in Great Britain: an introductory review
The 23 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBolger, D., Kushner, M., Brown, M. and Hubbell, J. (1983) The initial impact of light rail transit on travel in Calgary. Proceedings of the Institution of Transportation Engineers 53rd Annual Meeting, London, U.K.
no DOI — not checkedBushell, C. (ed.) (1994) Jane’s Urban Transport Systems. Jane’s Information Group, Coulsdon.
no DOI — not checkedDepartments of the Environment and Transport (1994) Planning Policy Guidance: Transport, PPG13.
no DOI — not checkedDepartment of Transport (1996) Transport Statistics Great Britain 1995. HMSO, London.
no DOI — not checkedDocklands Public Transport and Access Steering Group (1982) Public Transport Provision for Docklands: Summary of the Assessment of Schemes.
no DOI — not checkedDunphy, R. T. (1995) Review of recent American light rail experiences. Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Light Rail Transit, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A., November 1995, 1, 104–113.
no DOI — not checkedThe potential of rail as an environmental solution: setting the agenda
no DOI — not checkedGreater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive (1985) Proposed light rapid transit system: application to the Department of Transport for Section 56 Grant Aid. Manchester.
no DOI — not checkedHague, P. (1994) South Yorkshire Supertram—achieving government funding. Proceedings of the Light Rail ’94 Conference, ed. L. Lesley. Transport Science Limited, Liverpool, pp. 15–20.
no DOI — not checkedHall, P. and Hass-Klau, C. (1985) Can Rail Save the City? The Impacts of Rail Rapid Transit and Pedestrianisation on British and German Cities. Gower, Aldershot.
no DOI — not checkedSheffield Supertram
no DOI — not checkedPolitics and technical uncertainty in transportation investment analysis
no DOI — not checkedKeipper, A. F. (1994) Meeting future mobility needs with yesterday’s transit infrastructure. 10th Annual London Transport Lecture, 15 November 1994, London.
no DOI — not checkedLight rail transit in San Diego: the past as prelude to the future. Light Rail Transit: Planning, Design, and Operating Experience, Sixth National Conference on Light Rail Transit
no DOI — not checkedMackett, R. L. and Edwards, M. (1994) UTOPIA—a methodology for deciding on the best urban public transport system. Proceedings of the Light Rail 94 Conference, ed. L. Lesley. Transport Science Limited, Liverpool, pp. 71–85.
no DOI — not checkedMawhinney, B. (1995) Transport: the way ahead, Speeches by Dr Brian Mawhinney M P, Secretary of State for Transport, The Department of Transport, London.
no DOI — not checkedPublic transit: the key to better cities
no DOI — not checkedPickrell, D. H. (1990) Urban Rail Transit Projects: Forecast Versus Actual Ridership and Cost. DOT-T-91-04. Urban Mass Transportation Administration, U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC.
no DOI — not checkedPope, A. S. (1994) Urban development and transport needs, case study: Leeds. Paper presented at the Conference on New Systems for Urban Public Transport, Manchester, Great Britain, February 1994.
no DOI — not checkedThe world’s busiest new light rail system: Tuen Mun light rail transit
no DOI — not checkedRecognizing the value of rail transit
no DOI — not checkedWalmsley, D. and Perrett, K. (1992) The Effects of Rapid Transit on Public Transport and Urban Development. Transport Research Laboratory, Department of Transport, State-of-the-Art Review 6. HMSO, London.
no DOI — not checkedWhy success in St Louis?
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0965-8564(97)00041-4"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0965-8564(97)00041-4/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[00041-4/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s0965-8564(97)00041-4)