Reference health
Issues with spam
00066-1/badge.svg){kind=icon}
4/4 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-26
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
17 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 4 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1145/345508.345569
An experimental comparison of naive Bayesian and keyword-based anti-spam filtering with personal e-mail messages
The 17 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedSpamhaus Project (http://www.spamhaus.org/)
no DOI — not checkedUSA Today, June 25, 2003, “‘Cajun king of spam’ stirs pot of controversy”, Jon Swartz, pp.1B-2B
no DOI — not checkedMcWilliams, B., Wired Magazine online, http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,59907,00.html, August 6, 2003.
no DOI — not checkedSullivan, B., MSNBC News, http://www.msnbc.com/news/954523.asp, August 19, 2003.
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S1361-3723(04)00066-1_BIB5
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S1361-3723(04)00066-1_BIB6
no DOI — not checkedBroadbandReports.com, Tracking “Can Spam”, January 11, 2004, http://www.broadbandreports.com/shownews/37123.
no DOI — not checkedTMCnet.com, “MX Logic Finds Nearly 100 Percent of Spam Not Compliant With New CAN-SPAM Law”, http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2004/Jan/1022594.htm.
no DOI — not checkedOskoboiny, G., “Whitelist- based spam filtering”, http://impressive.net/people/gerald/2000/12/spam-filtering.html, October 27, 2003.
no DOI — not checkedDelio, M., “Spam Filters Grab Good With Bad”, Wires News, http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,61945,00.html, January 19, 2004.
no DOI — not checkedAsaravala, A., “With This Law, You Can Spam”, Wired News, http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,62020,00.html, January 23, 2004.
no DOI — not checked“Uncle Sam vs. Spam”
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S1361-3723(04)00066-1_BIB16
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S1361-3723(04)00066-1_BIB17
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S1361-3723(04)00066-1_BIB19
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S1361-3723(04)00066-1_BIB20
no DOI — not checked10.1016/S1361-3723(04)00066-1_BIB21
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s1361-3723(04)00066-1"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s1361-3723(04)00066-1/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[00066-1/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s1361-3723(04)00066-1)