Reference health

The iBreastExam versus clinical breast examination for breast evaluation in high risk and symptomatic Nigerian women: a prospective study

https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00030-4
CiteStamped reference-health badge
21/21 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-26

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

4 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 21 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1186/s12957-018-1345-2
Rising global burden of breast cancer: the case of sub-Saharan Africa (with emphasis on Nigeria) and implications for regional development: a review
resolves10.1155/2015/842032
Cancer Mortality Pattern in Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
resolves10.1016/j.breast.2005.06.008
The severity, outcome and challenges of breast cancer in Nigeria
resolves10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92204-4
REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY
resolves10.1136/bmj.297.6654.943
Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.
resolves10.1001/jama.1971.03180240027005
Periodic Breast Cancer Screening in Reducing Mortality From Breast Cancer
resolves10.1016/j.rcl.2004.06.014
The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned?
resolves10.1007/s13244-018-0636-z
Breast ultrasound: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging
resolves10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.08.005
Accuracy of mammography and clinical breast examination in the implementation of breast cancer screening programs in Colombia
resolves10.1002/cncr.23842
Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low- and middle-income countries
resolves10.1136/bmj.n256
Effect of screening by clinical breast examination on breast cancer incidence and mortality after 20 years: prospective, cluster randomised controlled trial in Mumbai
resolves10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi040
Screening Clinical Breast Examination: How Often Does It Miss Lethal Breast Cancer?
resolves10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.003
Accuracy of clinical breast examination’s abnormalities for breast cancer screening: cross-sectional study
resolves10.1200/JGO.19.00205
Clinical Utility of a Hand-Held Scanner for Breast Cancer Early Detection and Patient Triage
resolves10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.022
Breast Tumor Detection Using Piezoelectric Fingers: First Clinical Report
resolves10.1186/s12957-016-1022-2
A cost-effective handheld breast scanner for use in low-resource environments: a validation study
resolves10.1007/s40944-016-0057-1
Noninvasive and Low-Cost Technique for Early Detection of Clinically Relevant Breast Lesions Using a Handheld Point-of-Care Medical Device (iBreastExam): Prospective Three-Arm Triple-Blinded Comparative Study
resolves10.15406/jcpcr.2018.09.00337
Health worker led breast examination in rural India using electro-mechanical hand-held breast palpation device
resolves10.1063/1.4971325
Development of array piezoelectric fingers towards <i>in vivo</i> breast tumor detection
resolves10.1007/s12282-018-0857-5
An overview of mammographic density and its association with breast cancer
resolves10.1002/ijc.33484
Contemporary management of breast cancer in Nigeria: Insights from an institutional database
The 4 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBarriers to mammography screening in Nigeria: a survey of two communities with different access to screening facilities
no DOI — not checkedUltrasound for breast cancer detection globally: a systematic review and meta-analysis
no DOI — not checkedEvaluation of conventional training in Clinical Breast Examination (CBE)
no DOI — not checkedThe R package geepack for generalized estimating equations
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00030-4"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00030-4/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00030-4/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00030-4)