Reference health
Grammatical processing in language learners
97/97 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
44 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 97 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.55
Procedure for Assessing Verbal Working Memory in Normal School-Age Children: Some Preliminary Data
resolves10.1017/S1366728901000220
The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: the declarative/procedural model
resolves10.1007/BF01708418
Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions; Demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm
resolves10.1080/713755715
Evidence for Early Closure Attachment on First Pass Reading Times in French
resolves10.1017/S0142716400010572
Assessing the development of automaticity in second language word recognition
resolves10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00063-X
Event-related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan
resolves10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.134
Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation.
resolves10.1023/A:1021260920232
Antecedent Priming at Trace Positions in Japanese Long-Distance Scrambling
resolves10.1111/1467-8624.00203
Developmental Differences in Visual and Auditory Processing of Complex Sentences
resolves10.1162/089892906775250067
Morphological Processing in a Second Language: Behavioral and Event-related Brain Potential Evidence for Storage and Decomposition
resolves10.1006/brln.1997.1793
On the Brain Response to Syntactic Anomalies: Manipulations of Word Position and Word Class Reveal Individual Differences
resolves10.1023/A:1010490917575
What's Different in Second-Language Processing? Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials
resolves10.1111/1467-9922.00034
Main Verb Versus Reduced Relative Clause Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Sentence Processing
resolves10.1073/pnas.012611199
Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis
resolves10.1097/00001756-199703030-00028
Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German plurals
resolves10.1017/S0142716401004027
Native and non-native processing of English <i>wh</i>- questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints
resolves10.1023/A:1015588012457
Word Order in Sentence Processing: An Experimental Study of Verb Placement in German
resolves10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00032-3
The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children
resolves10.1016/0749-596X(91)90027-H
Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory
resolves10.1016/S0166-4115(02)80012-7
9 An on-line look at sentence processing in the second language
resolves10.1191/026765897670780840
Regular verbs, past tense and frequency: tracking down a potential source of NS/NNS competence differences
resolves10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00971-3
Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words
resolves10.1080/02724980143000172
Plausibility and subcategorization preference in children's processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences: Evidence from self-paced reading
resolves10.1163/9789004653023_015
Methodology in the Study of Language Acquisition: A Modular Approach
resolves10.1007/BF01067215
Filler-gap dependencies in a null subject language: Referential and nonreferential WHs
resolves10.1016/0010-0277(88)90004-2
Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish
resolves10.1023/A:1026468209238
One Frog, Two Frog, Red Frog, Blue Frog: Factors Affecting Children's Syntactic Choices in Production and Comprehension
resolves10.1007/978-94-011-3808-6_5
Logical and Psychological Constraints on the Acquisition of Syntax
resolves10.1111/j.1368-0005.2004.00065.x
Reading‐Time Evidence for Intermediate Linguistic Structure in Long‐Distance Dependencies
resolves10.1017/S0140525X00043600
How adult second language learning differs from child first language development
resolves10.1017/S1366728901000232
Processing a second language: late learners' comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials
resolves10.1017/S1366728903001056
Prosodic cues to semantic structure in native and nonnative listening
resolves10.1007/BF01069043
The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension
resolves10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.432
Structural and lexical constraints on filling gaps during sentence comprehension: A time-course analysis.
resolves10.1017/S0140525X99002228
Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection
resolves10.1023/A:1023293132656
Antecedent Priming at Trace Positions: Evidence from German Scrambling
resolves10.1017/S0142716400010845
Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition
resolves10.1191/0267658305sr255oa
The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language
resolves10.3758/BF03198535
Another word on parsing relative clauses: Eyetracking evidence from Spanish and English
resolves10.1017/S027226310000512X
Intake: On Models and Methods for Discovering Learners' Processing of Input
resolves10.1191/026765898668800317
Some effects of first language argument structure and morphosyntax on second language sentence processing
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524168.003.0006
Event-related potentials and language comprehension
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511597855.011
On not being led up the garden path: the use of context by the psychological syntax processor
resolves10.1207/s15327817la0103_2
Children's Knowledge of Locality Conditions in Binding as Evidence for the Modularity of Syntax and Pragmatics
resolves10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01958-7
Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence
resolves10.1017/S0142716403000237
The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English
resolves10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01237.x
Garden Path Sentences and Error Data in Second Language Sentence Processing
resolves10.1191/0267658302sr207oa
Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge
resolves10.1017/S0305000903005890
How do adults and children process referentially ambiguous pronouns?
resolves10.1075/lald.24.11fri
Development Patterns of Brain Activity Reflecting Semantic and Syntactic Processes
resolves10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.003
The effects of late acquisition of L2 and the consequences of immigration on L1 for semantic and morpho-syntactic language aspects
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511527210.012
Syntactic Attachment and Anaphor Resolution: The Two Sides of Relative Clause Attachment
resolves10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00536-3
The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution
resolves10.1080/027249897392251
Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution While Reading in Second and Native Languages
resolves10.1016/S0926-6410(97)00012-8
How the brain processes complex words: an event-related potential study of German verb inflections
resolves10.1162/jocn.1996.8.3.231
Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers
resolves10.1111/j.0079-1636.2004.00135.x
Representation, Processing and Working Memory in a Second Language
resolves10.1207/s15327817la1103_1
Children's Processing of Ambiguous Sentences: A Study of Relative Clause Attachment
resolves10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00004-9
Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: the processing of German WH-questions
resolves10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61504-6
On-line Integration of Grammatical Information in a Second Language
resolves10.1016/0010-0277(94)00636-Y
Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs
resolves10.7131/chuugokugogaku.1986.94
The 44 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedFrazier L. , & Clifton C. 1996.Construal.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
no DOI — not checkedPickering M. 1999.Sentence comprehension.In S. Garrod & M. Pickering (Eds.),Language processing(pp. 123–153).Hove, East Sussex:Psychology Press.
no DOI — not checkedWhite L. , & Juffs A. 1998.Constraints on wh-movement in two different contexts of non-native language acquisition: Competence and processing.In S. Flynn , G. Martohardjono , & W. O'Neill (Eds.),The generative study of second language acquisition.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
no DOI — not checkedMeroni L. , & Crain S. 2003.On not being led down the kindergarten path.In B. Beachley , A. Brown , & F. Coulin (Eds.),Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development(pp. 531–544).Somerville, MA:Cascadilla Press.
no DOI — not checkedRoberts L. , Marinis T. , Felser C. , & Clahsen H. 2006.Antecedent priming at trace positions in children's sentence processing.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,35.
no DOI — not checkedMazuka R. , & Uetsuki M. 2004.Children's use of prosody in the comprehension of syntactically ambiguous sentences.Poster presented at the 17th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, University of Maryland, March 2004.
no DOI — not checkedNicol J. 1988.Coreference processing during sentence comprehension.Unpublished PhD Dissertation,Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
no DOI — not checkedMitchell D. , & Cuetos F. 1991.The origins of parsing strategies.In C. Smith (Ed.),Current issues in natural language processing(pp. 1–12).Austin, TX:University of Austin, Center for Cognitive Science.
no DOI — not checkedParadis M. 1994.Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA.In N. Ellis (Ed.),Implicit and explicit language learning(pp. 393–419).London:Academic Press.
no DOI — not checkedBates E. , & MacWhinney B. 1982.Functionalist approaches to grammar.In L. Gleitman & E. Wanner (Eds.),Language acquisition: The state of the art.New York:Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedBever T. G. , & McElree B. 1988.Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension.Linguistic Inquiry,19,35–43.
no DOI — not checkedBever T. G. 1970.The cognitive basis for linguistic structures.In J. R. Hayes (Ed.),Cognition and the development of language.New York:Wiley.
no DOI — not checkedFrazier L. 1978.On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies.Unpublished PhD Dissertation,Storrs.University of Connecticut,
no DOI — not checkedSmyth R. 2001.Prosody, overt number markers, and late closure in the L1 and L2 acquisition of subject–verb agreement.Unpublished manuscript,University of Toronto.
no DOI — not checkedFodor J. D. 1995.Comprehending sentence structure.In L. R. Gleitman & M. Liberman (Eds.),An invitation to cognitive science: Vol. 1. Language(2nd ed., pp. 209–246).Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
no DOI — not checkedChomsky N. 1977.On wh-movement.In P. Culivcover , T. Wasow , & A. Akmajian (Eds.),Formal syntax(pp. 71–132).New York:Academic Press.
no DOI — not checkedCuetos F. , Mitchell D. , & Corley M. 1996.Parsing in different languages.In M. Carreiras , J. Garcia-Albea , & N. Sebastian-Galles (Eds.),Language processing in Spanish(pp. 145–187).Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
no DOI — not checkedVanPatten B. 1996.Input processing and grammar instruction.Chestnut Hill, NJ:Ablex.
no DOI — not checkedMacWhinney B. 1997.Second language acquisition and the competition model.In A. De Groot & J. Kroll (Eds.),Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives(pp. 113–142).Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
no DOI — not checkedBley-Vroman R. 1990.The logical problem of second language learning.Linguistic Analysis,20,3–49.
no DOI — not checkedRoberts L. 2003.Syntactic processing in learners of English.Unpublished PhD Dissertation,Colchester.University of Essex,
no DOI — not checkedPrasada S. , Pinker S. , & Snyder W. 1990.Some evidence that irregular forms are retrieved from memory but regular forms are rule-generated.Paper presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, LA.
no DOI — not checkedFelser C. , & Roberts L. 2004.Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing.Poster presented at AMLaP, Aix-en-Provence, September 2004.
no DOI — not checkedSabourin L. 2003.Grammatical gender and second language processing: An ERP study.Unpublished PhD dissertation,University of Groningen.
no DOI — not checkedHawkins R. 2001.Second language syntax.Oxford:Blackwell.
no DOI — not checkedParadis M. 1997.The cognitive neuropsychology of bilingualism.In A. De Groot & J. Kroll (Eds.),Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives(pp. 331–354).Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
no DOI — not checkedBrovetto C. , & Ullman M. 2001.First vs. second language: A differential reliance on grammatical computations and lexical memory.Poster presented at the 14th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, University of Pennsylvania.
no DOI — not checkedLove T. , & Swinney D. 1997.Real time processing of object relative constructions by pre-school children.Poster presented at the 10th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Language Processing, Santa Monica, CA.
no DOI — not checkedMcLaughlin J. 1999.Event related potentials reflect the early stages of second language lexical acquisition.Unpublished PhD Dissertation,University of Washington.
no DOI — not checkedClahsen H. , & Muysken P. 1989.The UG paradox in L2 acquisition.Second Language Research,5,1–29.
no DOI — not checkedMacWhinney B. 1982.Basic syntactic processes.In S. Kuczaj (Ed.),Language acquisition: Vol. 1. Syntax and semantics.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
no DOI — not checkedSnedeker J. , Thorpe K. , & Trueswell J. 2001.On choosing the parse within the scene: The role of visual context and verb bias in ambiguity resolution.In J. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.),Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society(pp. 964–996).Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
no DOI — not checkedClahsen H. 1984.The acquisition of German word order: A test case for cognitive approaches to L2 development.In R. Andersen (Ed.),Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective.Rowley, MA:Newbury House.
no DOI — not checkedFrenck-Mestre C. 1999.Examining second language reading: An on-line look.In A. Sorace , C. Heycock , & R. Shillcok (Eds.),Language acquisition: Knowledge representation and processing(pp. 474–478).Amsterdam:Elsevier.
no DOI — not checkedClahsen H. , & Muysken P. 1986.The accessibility of universal grammar to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order.Second Language Research,2,93–119.
no DOI — not checkedChoi Y. , & Mazuka R. 2002.Young children's use of prosodic cues in sentence processing.Paper presented at he 15th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York.
no DOI — not checkedLück M. , Hahne A. , Friederici A. , & Clahsen H. 2001.Developing brain potentials in children: An ERP study of German noun plurals.Paper presented at 26th Boston University Conference on Language Development, November 2001.
no DOI — not checkedWexler K. , & Chien Y. 1985.The development of lexical anaphors and pronouns.Papers and Reports on Child Language Development (Vol. 24).Palo Alto, CA:Stanford University Press.
no DOI — not checkedBirdsong D. , & Flege J. 2000.Regular–irregular dissociations in L2 acquisition of English morphology.Paper presented at the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development, November 2000.
no DOI — not checkedDussias P. 2001.Sentence parsing in fluent Spanish–English bilinguals.In J. Nicol (Ed.),One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing(pp. 159–176).Malden, MA:Blackwell.
no DOI — not checkedKutas M. , & Schmitt B. 2003.Language in microvolts.In M. T. Banich & M. Mack (Eds.),Mind, brain, and language(pp. 171–209).Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
no DOI — not checkedPapadopoulou D. , & Clahsen H. 2003.Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,24,501–528.
no DOI — not checkedAndersen R. 1993.Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems.In K. Hyltenstam & A. Viberg (Eds.),Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological and linguistic perspectives(pp. 309–339).Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedPinker S. 1999.Words and rules. The ingredients of language.New York:Basic Books.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1017/s0142716406060024"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1017/s0142716406060024/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1017/s0142716406060024)