Reference health

Genetic differentiation of Phoma exigua varieties by means of AFLP fingerprints

https://doi.org/10.1017/s0953756202005804
CiteStamped reference-health badge
4/4 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

6 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 4 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1023/A:1009612517139
Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories
resolves10.1080/02681219580000651
Phylogenetic relationships of human-pathogenic<i>Cladosporium</i>(<i>Xylohypha</i>) species inferred from partial LS rRNA sequences
resolves10.1007/BF00224072
AFLP analysis of the diversity and phylogeny of Lens and its comparison with RAPD analysis
resolves10.1093/nar/23.21.4407
AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting
The 6 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAa, H. A. van der, Boerema, G. H. & de Gruyter, J. (2000) Contributions towards a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes)-VI-section Phyllostictoides: Characteristics and nomenclature of its type species Phoma exigua Desm. Persoonia 17: 435–456.
no DOI — not checkedSpecies concepts in some larger genera of the Coelomycetes
no DOI — not checkedBoerema, G. H. (1997) Contributions towards a monograph of Phoma (coelomycetes), V. Subdivision of the genus in sections. Mycotaxon 64: 321–333.
no DOI — not checkedRemarks on species of Phoma referred to Peyronellaea, IV
no DOI — not checkedPhoma exigua Desm. and its varieties
no DOI — not checkedAmplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1017/s0953756202005804"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1017/s0953756202005804/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1017/s0953756202005804/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1017/s0953756202005804)