Reference health

Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts of Utilizing Waste for Biochar in Rural Areas in Indonesia–A Systems Perspective

https://doi.org/10.1021/es405190q
CiteStamped reference-health badge
33/33 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

15 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 33 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015
A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis
resolves10.1038/447143a
A handful of carbon
resolves10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.03.004
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of global biochar mitigation potential
resolves10.4155/cmt.13.3
Biochar field testing in the UK: outcomes and implications for use
resolves10.3390/agronomy3020256
Biochar Effect on Maize Yield and Soil Characteristics in Five Conservation Farming Sites in Zambia
resolves10.1016/j.fcr.2011.01.014
Effects and fate of biochar from rice residues in rice-based systems
resolves10.1021/es304942e
Cleaner Cooking Solutions to Achieve Health, Climate, and Economic Cobenefits
resolves10.1021/es902266r
Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar Systems: Estimating the Energetic, Economic, and Climate Change Potential
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.035
The economic value of biochar in crop production and carbon sequestration
resolves10.1021/es302720k
Life Cycle Assessment to Evaluate the Environmental Impact of Biochar Implementation in Conservation Agriculture in Zambia
resolves10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.12.057
The sorption and desorption of phosphate-P, ammonium-N and nitrate-N in cacao shell and corn cob biochars
resolves10.1016/j.renene.2008.12.009
Improved and more environmentally friendly charcoal production system using a low-cost retort–kiln (Eco-charcoal)
resolves10.1021/es103563z
Intake Fraction for Particulate Matter: Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment
resolves10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.024
Health and climate benefits of cookstove replacement options
resolves10.1021/es302545b
Biochar Carbon Stability in a Clayey Soil As a Function of Feedstock and Pyrolysis Temperature
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0075932
A Systematic Review of Biochar Research, with a Focus on Its Stability in situ and Its Promise as a Climate Mitigation Strategy
resolves10.1126/science.1154960
Fire-Derived Charcoal Causes Loss of Forest Humus
resolves10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.02.005
Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils
resolves10.1007/s10533-012-9764-6
Modelling the long-term response to positive and negative priming of soil organic carbon by black carbon
resolves10.1021/es301693f
Pollutant Emissions and Energy Efficiency under Controlled Conditions for Household Biomass Cookstoves and Implications for Metrics Useful in Setting International Test Standards
resolves10.1080/19390450903350861
The Economic Costs of Indoor Air Pollution: New Results for Indonesia, the Philippines, and Timor-Leste
resolves10.1002/pam.10026
What determines the value of life? a meta‐analysis
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018
Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment
resolves10.1007/s10098-009-0265-9
Life cycle impact assessment research developments and needs
resolves10.1021/es703145t
Building a Model Based on Scientific Consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Chemicals: The Search for Harmony and Parsimony
resolves10.1007/BF02977843
The requirement for congruence in normalization
resolves10.1021/es103925u
Use of Life Cycle Assessments To Evaluate the Environmental Footprint of Contaminated Sediment Remediation
resolves10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00350.x
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Charcoal, Biogas, and Liquefied Petroleum Gas as Cooking Fuels in Ghana
resolves10.2134/agronj2007.0161
The Charcoal Vision: A Win–Win–Win Scenario for Simultaneously Producing Bioenergy, Permanently Sequestering Carbon, while Improving Soil and Water Quality
resolves10.1016/j.eiar.2008.02.004
Fuel switching from wood to LPG can benefit the environment
resolves10.1016/j.esd.2010.04.005
The Indian National Initiative for Advanced Biomass Cookstoves: The benefits of clean combustion
resolves10.1016/j.eiar.2009.02.004
Charcoal versus LPG grilling: A carbon-footprint comparison
resolves10.1038/ncomms1053
Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change
The 15 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAdvances in Agronomy
no DOI — not checkedref9/cit9
no DOI — not checkedref12/cit12
no DOI — not checkedBiochar for environmental management, science and technology
no DOI — not checkedTabadepu, H.Application of biochar technology in Indonesia. Sequestering carbon in the soil, improving crop yield and providing alternative clean energy.http://www.id.undp.org/content/indonesia/en/home/operations/projects/environment_and_energy/application-of-biochar-technology-in-indonesia-sequestering-car.html(accessed April 6, 2014).
no DOI — not checkedEEP Analysing briquette markets in Tanzania, Kenya and Uganda; 2013.
no DOI — not checkedref18/cit18
no DOI — not checkedIndonesia: Toward Universal Access to Clean Cooking
no DOI — not checkedThird Periodic Assessment of the State of the Environment of the Baltic Sea, 1989 1993
no DOI — not checkedBTG Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Biomass Waste Stockpiles – Final Report; 2002.
no DOI — not checkedReCiPe 2008 A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. First edition. Report 1: Characterisation
no DOI — not checked2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories
no DOI — not checkedEnvironmental Science & Technology
no DOI — not checkedComparative quantification of health risks: global and regional burden of disease attributable to selected major risk factors
no DOI — not checkedTechnical Support Document: Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1021/es405190q"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1021/es405190q/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1021/es405190q/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1021/es405190q)