Reference health
The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning
11/11 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-24
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
23 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 11 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/0260293960210101
Assessing Learning Quality: reconciling institutional, staff and educational demands
resolves10.3102/00028312026004473
Cognition and Improvisation: Differences in Mathematics Instruction by Expert and Novice Teachers
resolves10.1023/A:1004068500314
Implications for evaluation from a study of students' perceptions of good and poor teaching
resolves10.3102/00028312031002231
Assessment for Measurement or Standards: The Peril and Promise of Large-Scale Assessment Reform
The 23 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAlverno College Faculty (1994). Student Assessment-as-Learning at Alverno College. Milwaukee: Alverno College Institute.
no DOI — not checkedBiggs, J.B. (ed.) (1996c). Testing: To Educate or to Select? Education in Hong Kong at the Crossroads. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Educational Publishing Co.
no DOI — not checkedBiggs, J.B. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Open Univer-sity Press.
no DOI — not checkedBiggs, J.B. and Collis, K.F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
no DOI — not checkedBowden, J. and Marton, F. (1998). The University of Learning. London: Kogan Page.
no DOI — not checkedBoyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities for the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advabncement of Teaching.
no DOI — not checkedCoady, T. (ed.) (2000). Why Universities Matter. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
no DOI — not checkedCowan, J. (1999). On Becoming an Innovative University Teacher: Reflection in Action. Buckingham: Open University Press.
no DOI — not checkedDawkins, J. (1987). Higher Education; a Policy Discussion Paper. Canberra, Australian Government Printing Office.
no DOI — not checkedElliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
no DOI — not checkedGoodlad, S. (1995). The Quest for Quality: 16 Forms of Heresy in Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press and The Society for Research into Higher Education.
no DOI — not checkedHarvey, L. and Green, D. (1993). ‘Defining quality’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18, 8–35.
no DOI — not checkedHong Kong University Grants Committee (2000). Letter to Universities (2 May, 2000).
no DOI — not checkedJarratt Report (1985). Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency Studies in Universities. London: Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals.
no DOI — not checkedListon, C. (1999). Managing Quality and Standards. Buckingham: Open University Press.
no DOI — not checkedMcGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw Hill.
no DOI — not checkedMentowski, M. (2000). Learning that Lasts. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
no DOI — not checkedProsser, M. and Trigwell, K. (1998). Teaching for Learning in Higher Education. Buck-ingham: Open University Press.
no DOI — not checkedSchon, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
no DOI — not checkedSeymour, D.T. (1993). On Q: Causing Quality in Higher Education. Phoenix, AZ: The Oryx Press.
no DOI — not checkedStigler, J. and Hiebert, J. (1999). The Teaching Gap. New York: The Free Press.
no DOI — not checkedTyler, R.W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
no DOI — not checkedWare, J. and Williams, R.G. (1975). ‘The Dr. Fox Effect: a study of lecturer effectiveness and ratings of instruction’, Journal of Medical Education 50, 149–156.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/a%3A1004181331049"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/a%3A1004181331049/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/a%3A1004181331049)