Reference health

Interspecific complementary and competitive interactions between intercropped maize and faba bean

https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004656205144
CiteStamped reference-health badge
8/8 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 8 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60522-2
Biological Efficiencies in Multiple-Cropping Systems
resolves10.1016/0378-4290(93)90117-6
Processes determining intercrop productivity and yields of component crops
resolves10.1016/0038-0717(95)00134-4
Barley uptake of N deposited in the rhizosphere of associated field pea
resolves10.2307/2403009
Root and Shoot Interactions Between Barley and Field Beans When Intercropped
resolves10.1016/0378-4290(93)90122-4
Agronomic modification of resource use and intercrop productivity
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511623523
The Ecology of Intercropping
resolves10.1017/S0014479700011613
A Field Technique for Separating Above- and Below-Ground Interactions in Intercropping: an Experiment With Pearl Millet/Groundnut
resolves10.1017/S0014479700010802
A Competitive Ratio for Quantifying Competition Between Intercrops
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedDeWit C T 1960 On competition. Versl. Landbouwkd. Onderz. 660, 1–82.
no DOI — not checkedTrenbath B R 1986 Resource use by intercrops. In Multiple Cropping Systems. Ed. C A Francis. pp 57–81. Macmillan, New York.
no DOI — not checkedWilley RW1979 Intercropping-its importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32, 1–10.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/a%3A1004656205144"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/a%3A1004656205144/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/a%3A1004656205144/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1023/a%3A1004656205144)